Impeachment

Anyone else think of this with Schiff, et al?

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Gosh Bubba sorry you’re so busy,,,,,just ribbing you, but I am sorry to hear of your hospitalized daughter - hope she is alright.
 
But it wouldn't necessarily make him more credible.

If he changed his testimony and goes with the “refreshed” then that makes him lose his credibility due to changing it.

If he goes in and changes it back to his original testimony then it makes him a liar.

Either way Trump wins. It’s Schitt that needs credibility from somewhere because so far he’s struck out with every witness. Once Sondland changed his original testimony he was done.
 
I know I should accept or reject Vindman's words based on whether they are shown to be accurate or not, and not on him coming across as an egotistical douche, but since he does in fact exude such egotistical douchiness, it makes that difficult to do.
 
Have you noticed since the sham of an impeachment proceedings (charade) started we haven’t heard much from the three. I have nothing going on at work so I decided to have some fun and look at a time line for them three posting here.

Sept 24th - Nov 1st called the “We got Trump this time Phase”

Here’s the breakdown.

Sept 24th - 30th. Posting numbers.
SH = 65
LH = 16
Bubba = 2

Oct 1st - 31st
SH = 279
LH = 65
Bubba = 60
(Oct 23rd). I warned them “You guys always think y’all have Trump this time are only setting yourself up for disappointment everytime”

Nov 1st -12th (two of the three are starting to question themselves as more info comes out)
SH = 36
LH = 12
Bubba = 40

I call this the “Time we move on and find another “we got Trump this time” for blah blah blah phase” (reality sets in)
Schitt’s Show Circus starts Nov 12th
SH = 7 :yikes:
LH = 16 (mostly to talk about Roger Stone)
Bubba = 20

Pre-Schitt show Sept 24th - Nov 12th
SH = 380
LH= 93
Bubba = 102

Start of Schitt Show to Date
SH = 7
LH = 16
Bubba = 20

It took me about an hour but so much fun exposing the difference when they were believing the lies until that moment they felt they’ve been had again by Adam Schitt. You could actually picture their expression when it just got real.

I'm reading and laughing at the circus y'all are leading. It's no longer worth my time to debate ignorance so I've taken to private messages with the more educated posters.
 
I'm reading and laughing at the circus y'all are leading. It's no longer worth my time to debate ignorance so I've taken to private messages with the more educated posters.

To you educated posters = The ones that aren't laughing at me for making an *** out of myself. A real educated poster knows this impeachment is a sham.
 
Last edited:
I'm reading and laughing at the circus y'all are leading. It's no longer worth my time to debate ignorance so I've taken to private messages with the more educated posters.

So you are going with the “I’m too intelligent for you” argument. :lmao: If you are so intelligent then why are you a Democrat? Oh.....and you are indeed a Democrat if you want to admit it or not. Something else you won’t admit is that you believed everything Adam Schitt said. That Schitt head let you down again.

Let me guess you are private messaging with Roger35’s circle. It’s where all the liberals go that have been humiliated. :clap:
 
Remember when someone in the Trump admin questioned the loyalty of Vidman? Maybe it was because of this (though I agree it was done in poor taste and disrespectful to do so):

 
I'm reading and laughing at the circus y'all are leading. It's no longer worth my time to debate ignorance so I've taken to private messages with the more educated posters.

If there is one direct piece of evidence that PROVES Donald Trump ordered or negotiated a quid pro quo with Ukraine then it would be great to see it.

But there is another fact and this is it: The Left has never accepted Trump's victory and they've been on a mission to impeach from day one. It is OBVIOUS.
 
If there is one direct piece of evidence that PROVES Donald Trump ordered or negotiated a quid pro quo with Ukraine then it would be great to see it.

But there is another fact and this is it: The Left has never accepted Trump's victory and they've been on a mission to impeach from day one. It is OBVIOUS.

To be fair the libs want to impeach every Republican President. I think they've tried this to every republican for the last 50 years or something like that.
 
This is my original post on this thread (I started it on Sept 24):

What is this Ukraine thing all about? Didn’t Hillary tried to get campaign info against Trump from Ukrainians? Didn’t Biden pressure Ukraine to stop an investigation due to alleged corruption? Forwarding to today, if Trump presses Ukraine about corruption, that is impeachable? I don’t get it. Or is this a fake issue to get Dems to impeach Trump, something they want to do anyway. If latter is true, doesn’t that signal they don’tthink Warren or Biden can win?
 
Do you need my work schedule? My daughter's softball, basketball and soccer schedules? My other daughter's hospitalization calendar? Maybe the schedule of the business that my wife and I opened as a "side hustle" on 10/1/19? Capitalism, Yo! Or do you think I was awaiting my marching orders from Schiff and Pelosi?
All kidding aside, hope and pray for your daughter’s road to better health.
 
Again, did not see any testimony. I have read multiple updates here, Fox, CNN and Breitbart. Once again, must have been another staff meeting at CNN today. They missed some damning testimony - In favor of Trump.
 
Pence national security advisor Kellogg heard nothing wrong or of concern on the Trump-Zelensky call.

keith-kellogg-jennifer-williams-pence-trump-zelensky-call-impeachment-d3dfcf62-d089-4b9d-8f0e-0dda9f3f914e.html

She skips her upward chain to "report" her concerns to someone who would carry the ball to the next yard marker

I think years from now, this will have a Watergate type stench x10. I didn't think the dems were dumb enough to attempt a coup but this is taking that shape.
 
Last edited:
If he changed his testimony and goes with the “refreshed” then that makes him lose his credibility due to changing it.

If he goes in and changes it back to his original testimony then it makes him a liar.

Either way Trump wins. It’s Schitt that needs credibility from somewhere because so far he’s struck out with every witness. Once Sondland changed his original testimony he was done.
You don’t think roger stone’s recent conviction might not have something to do with the sudden improvements in memories?
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top