IMO, the Fix is in

Monahorns said:
It also assumes the lawyer who freed Flynn in an actual court as the crazy one. Your logic is a bit skewed.
Click to expand...

For the record, I struggle to understand how much credit Powell deserves for the "freeing" Flynn. He was ready to be sentenced before Bill Barr stepped in and pulled the governments case, after Flynn had already admitted to guilt, multiple times. Maybe some are giving Powell credit for lobbying Barr?
 
Seattle Husker said:
That's the quandary of the claims. They are being asked to disprove wild claims in which #ReleaseTheKraken #Biblical #EPIC evidence has yet to be presented. To be fair, being asked to explain why they aren't guilty is goofy.
Click to expand...

And of course, that won't fly in court, but it might fly if you're trying to launch a TV network, which I suspect is the point.
 
Phil Elliott said:
That is not true. Have you ever asked yourself why Sidney Powell would take this on, and make the statements she is making, if she was FOS? She's already made her reputation after what she pulled off in the Michael Flynn case. Why would she risk that if she knows she will eventually be exposed as a fraud?
Click to expand...

What's not true? That she was shitcanned? What's the rationale on that?

And there is a very plausible rationale for pitching this even if it's wrong. It's the same rationale that Kim Kardashian had for letting a sex tape get leaked. It is making her famous, and there's a lot of money to be made from that.

Also, Trump also got 10 million more votes. It was a very high turnout election.
 
Last edited:
That's the quandary of the claims. They are being asked to disprove wild claims in which #ReleaseTheKraken #Biblical #EPIC evidence has yet to be presented.
Click to expand...

This is rapidly reaching "crap or get off the pot" status.
 
OUBubba said:
Click to expand...


With a 140k vote margin MI was always a longshot for Trump. No matter how much smoke the R's tried to create in Detroit they couldn't get the fire going to burn enough votes to throw the election to Trump. I suspect the State GOP officials weren't willing to give Michigan to the D's for a generation by pulling shenanigans to overturn the election. In the end, Trump wasn't worth it.
 
Statalyzer said:
This is rapidly reaching "crap or get off the pot" status.
Click to expand...

I think we're well past that point, and frankly the clock is running out to even do it in court. It makes me wonder if the goal is actually to blow off the legal proceeding and create enough political doubt in the election results to pressure the legislatures to invalidate the results and choose Trump electors. And if that doesn't work, exploit the controversy launch Trump TV.
 
Mr. Deez said:
I think we're well past that point, and frankly the clock is running out to even do it in court. It makes me wonder if the goal is actually to blow off the legal proceeding and create enough political doubt in the election results to pressure the legislatures to invalidate the results and choose Trump electors. And if that doesn't work, exploit the controversy launch Trump TV.
Click to expand...

I think they switched to hoping the Legislatures would override the voters early last week, about the time of the Guiliani crazytown PC. All of the legal cases from Trump surrogates were getting mowed down in the courts making it obvious they couldn't get the ballots tossed. After all, we're not talking about a few hundred votes but rather 10's of thousands in most cases. Now the writing is clearly on the wall for Trump. He's lost Michigan. The GA recount will simply confirm the same count as before within a few hundred. Wisconsin and PA aren't enough, though he'll likely lose both of them too.

What's next? He's about to show that he doesn't care about the Republican party, never has. If he keeps pushing the voter fraud in GA he'll potentially depress the R vote again (and excite the D) just as he did with VBM. Do you think he might actually want the D's to win the Senate? It's still an extreme longshot but if he has any plans to run in 2024 or simply wants to fill arena's charging his sycophants $10 a seat isn't that a lot easier if you have the Democrat boogeymen controlling all branches of government?

He'll go to the grave claiming the election was stolen from him and use that as a rallying cry in whatever his next $$$ venture is.
 
The PA Supreme Court on Monday ruled that mail-in/ballots with no dates or handwritten names/addresses on the outer envelopes can be counted.
A voter is required to “fill out, date, and sign” the declaration on the outside envelope the Trump campaign argued (citing 25 P.S. §§ 3146.6(a) and 3150.16(a)).

So the Pa Supreme Court can ignore state law?
 
LonghornCatholic said:
Click to expand...


@Mr. Deez Do you think the Supreme Court accepts the Trump Campaign's case that seeks to throw out the entire state as a remedy for 2 voters that were denied the opportunity to cure their ballots? I believe they are suing under the Equal Protection clause?

As stated previously, I doubt the SCOTUS takes up the case but I'm not a lawyer. Just seems to be an absurd solution to a small problem, of which they didn't even sue the correct defendants.
 
The Onion nor the Bee could make this up.

The attorney representing the Trump Campaign in the Wisconsin recount is trying to get his own vote (and wife's vote) thrown out because of the legal argument they are making.

The attorney leading President Donald Trump’s recount effort in Wisconsin voted illegally according to his own legal argument that in-person absentee ballots should be thrown out. So did his wife.
...
Their names appeared on exhibits Troupis submitted to the Dane County Board of Canvassers on Sunday, during the county's third day of retallying ballots. The exhibits include lists of voters who voted in a manner the campaign alleges is illegal, an argument the Board of Canvassers has rejected. The information was provided by Dane County to both campaigns.

"I'm sure I'm on that list," he said, while referring other questions to the recount effort's communications team, which includes Republican Party of Wisconsin Chairman Andrew Hitt. Hitt did not immediately answer questions.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top