Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^ To that I put this from you right here.
"Work on a campaign some time, preferably for someone you are not enamored of particularly, and note how many idiots are rabid supporters or support the lame candidate for reasons that are nonsensical. "
Would you include NOT supporting a candidate for reasons that are nonsensical?
Is this proof and/or admission that that the intelligence community rigged the 2020 election?
Is this proof and/or admission that that the intelligence community rigged the 2020 election?
Is this proof and/or admission that that the intelligence community rigged the 2020 election?
Another thing about this, think about what it says. They've dealt with people who sever heads and burn people alive because of religous differences and people who stone gays. However, to them, the people who think men can't get pregnant and that we shouldn't be talking to 5-8 year olds about dicks in schools are worse. Even if you're a person of the Left, the hyperbole has to make you question this guy's integrity.
If it's going to just follow the government's orders on censorship, it gets harder for it to argue that it's not a state actor. Effectively, it is.
I've read that the government coercing a private entity to censor political information is a violation of the first amendment. Is this true and is the FBI breaking the law here? What's your take?
"Nice windows you have here...be a shame if something happened to them."Here's the problem. Did the FBI coerce, or did it "request?" If it coerced, then it's definitely illegal. If it simply requested and Facebook dutifully complied (and let's be honest, it probably did since it has the same political agenda), then finding an illegal act is going to be much harder to establish.
"Nice windows you have here...be a shame if something happened to them."
Comment or threat? Same thing at the end of the day...
If it's going to just follow the government's orders on censorship, it gets harder for it to argue that it's not a state actor. Effectively, it is.
I've read that the government coercing a private entity to censor political information is a violation of the first amendment. Is this true and is the FBI breaking the law here? What's your take?
CFP Round 2 • Peach Bowl
Wed, Jan 1 • 12:00 PM on ESPN
AZ State game and preview thread