Forensic Audit in Maricopa County, AZ

Thanks for that. Precisely how I feel and if I think there were shenanigans but no proof it doesn’t mean I do not (reluctantly) accept the results I just don’t believe them in my heart. Doesn’t mean I’m a traitor or, for that matter, a moron.
That's not wrong. Maybe I should clarify. If someone like Ron Johnson who says to someone in public “I think it’s probably true that Biden got maybe 7 million more popular votes. That’s the electoral reality. So to just say for sure that this was a stolen election, I don’t agree with that.” Then, in an official capacity try to present alternate electors to the Senator. That's traitorous.

If an individual believes the gobblydygook that Rudy and his minions put out there at Four Seasons Landscaping that Bill Barr referred to as ********, then maybe we need to have an IQ test to hold office. At least those fools are acting in good faith even if it is stupidity.
 
All you need to know that the 2020 election was unfair via ballot harvesting:




Yep. The panic that also happens when someone wants to do an actual audit of an election tells you exactly what you need to know. It's not difficult to figure out something's amiss.
 
I think all states that still allow drop off ballot boxes have moved them to election offices and curtailed the hours they can be used Plus working cameras are required.
Not that there was anything hinky going on with drop off ballots in 2020.:rolleyes1:
 
Doesn't matter where one stands on this issue...this one was too good to pass up.
FXlcSqBWAAElMX4
 
Lost, Not Stolen
As part of his post-election attempts to retain the presidency, Donald Trump and his supporters filed 64 cases containing 187 counts in the six key battleground states, in addition to utilizing some of the recount and contest procedures available to them under state law. The former president maintains to this day that the 2020 election was stolen and the results fraudulent.

This Report takes a hard look at the very serious charges made by Trump and his supporters. The consequences of a president and a major party candidate making such charges are monumental. If true, our electoral system is in desperate need of repair. If not true, that must be said because such false charges corrode our democracy and leave a significant share of the population doubting the legitimacy of our system, seriously weakening the country. To have 30 percent of the country lack faith in election results based on unsubstantiated claims of a “stolen” election is not sustainable in a democracy, and it discredits the political party making those charges. We hope that setting out the full record in this Report will help restore faith in the reliability of our elections.

Who wrote this pray tell?

We are political conservatives who have spent most of our adult lives working to support the Constitution and the conservative principles upon which it is based: limited government, liberty, equality of opportunity, freedom of religion, a strong national defense, and the rule of law.

We have become deeply troubled by efforts to overturn or discredit the results of the 2020 Presidential Election. There is no principle of our Republic more fundamental than the right of the People to elect our leaders and for their votes to be counted accurately. Efforts to thwart the People’s choice are deeply undemocratic and unpatriotic. Claims that an election was stolen, or that the outcome resulted from fraud, are deadly serious and should be made only on the basis of real and powerful evidence.
Cucks and hacks, I'm sure...
 
Lost, Not Stolen


Who wrote this pray tell?

Cucks and hacks, I'm sure...

I do give libs credit though on one thing. They've convinced even members of my team that election corruption is a conspiracy theory even though it's been happening even before the Tammany Hall days.

When election officials use the courts to keep you from looking deeper that tells you all you need to know.
 
I do give libs credit though on one thing. They've convinced even members of my team that election corruption is a conspiracy theory even though it's been happening even before the Tammany Hall days.

When election officials use the courts to keep you from looking deeper that tells you all you need to know.
What is sad about that report is that graduates of what used to be esteemed law schools overlook that almost every one of the cases was NOT dismissed on merit but rather on issues of standing. They then put out nonsense that allowed the left to point and continue ignoring that reality...they clearly sucked in bubba.
 
What is sad about that report is that graduates of what used to be esteemed law schools overlook that almost every one of the cases was NOT dismissed on merit but rather on issues of standing. They then put out nonsense that allowed the left to point and continue ignoring that reality...they clearly sucked in bubba.
clearly
 
What is sad about that report is that graduates of what used to be esteemed law schools overlook that almost every one of the cases was NOT dismissed on merit but rather on issues of standing. They then put out nonsense that allowed the left to point and continue ignoring that reality...they clearly sucked in bubba.

How many even got to look under the hood of the election? Besides Gableman in Wisconsin and the audit group in AZ I can tell you it's been zip.
 
What is sad about that report is that graduates of what used to be esteemed law schools overlook that almost every one of the cases was NOT dismissed on merit but rather on issues of standing. They then put out nonsense that allowed the left to point and continue ignoring that reality...they clearly sucked in bubba.

True, but standing issues can be cured in subsequent litigation. Nobody seems to be doing that.
 
What is sad about that report is that graduates of what used to be esteemed law schools overlook that almost every one of the cases was NOT dismissed on merit but rather on issues of standing. They then put out nonsense that allowed the left to point and continue ignoring that reality...they clearly sucked in bubba.

Another ******** line that they state is that the sharpies bleeding through wasn't true. It was true. The auditors pointed it out in their report. This is what proved the fake ballots in Arizona. The official Vote-secure ballots that AZ uses won't bleed through but the fake, thin, cheap foreign ballots and the photocopied ballots did. I KNOW BECAUSE I'VE SEEN THEM.

I am so ******* tired of the constant disinformation.
 
Last edited:
Nicely done mc
Such a typical lib non response when they know they don't have one.
We see it here all the time
That or deflection
Lool!Look!! A squirrel .
 
I sent this to my liberal friend in Austin, saying quality of the vote is more important than quantity. He responded with “whatever”.

Records show coordinated Arizona ballot collection scheme
I have conceded that this stuff happens on a local level. Typically, it is with local elections to get some yayhoo a job. It is bipartisan in nature.

From your link: The records show that fewer than a dozen ballots could be linked to Fuentes
 
I have conceded that this stuff happens on a local level. Typically, it is with local elections to get some yayhoo a job. It is bipartisan in nature.

From your link: The records show that fewer than a dozen ballots could be linked to Fuentes
Tip of the iceberg. Takes only one Fuentes in each precinct to tip the election in AZ, WI, and GA. Fuentes happened to be caught. If folks looked hard enough, you will find them.
 
Tip of the iceberg. Takes only one Fuentes in each precinct to tip the election in AZ, WI, and GA. Fuentes happened to be caught. If folks looked hard enough, you will find them.
Agree but they’re bipartisan in nature and relatively small in size and focus on local issues. I might bet $50 that there was a local election thing motivating Fuentes. This one was 12 votes.
 
"While fewer than twelve ballots are directly linked to Fuentes, many contend the scheme goes much farther, as it was caught on video — outside the culture center no less:

“Attorney general’s office investigator William Kluth wrote in one report that there was some evidence suggesting Fuentes actively canvassed San Luis neighborhoods and collected ballots, in some cases paying for them.”[/QUOTE]
 
People also seem to forget that True the Vote has a whistleblower that admits to have ballot harvested 4500 ballots in the 2020 election and senate runoffs. He says there were a lot of harvesters out there. No amount of BS from the media or saying that geolocation isn't accurate (We use it to catch criminals and to find our lost phones) doesn't change a damn thing.
 
Remember how many times I've talked about this? We finally have the name of the person who deleted the election database in Maricopa.

 
So these are the files Maricopa County officials said were deleted even though it is required to keep then for 22 months? Then MC officials said they'd been archived?
Now vids show this Brian Ramirez ALONE in the server room on multiple occasions even tho Brian was not authorized to be in that room.AND that server room was supposed to have 2 authorized people never one alone.
Brian used other people's cards to get in. There is also footage of the Assistant Director of Elections letting Brian into the server room.

Anyone who wants fair elections should hope these people are prosecuted.
 
So these are the files Maricopa County officials said were deleted even though it is required to keep then for 22 months? Then MC officials said they'd been archived?
Now vids show this Brian Ramirez ALONE in the server room on multiple occasions even tho Brian was not authorized to be in that room.AND that server room was supposed to have 2 authorized people never one alone.
Brian used other people's cards to get in. There is also footage of the Assistant Director of Elections letting Brian into the server room.

Anyone who wants fair elections should hope these people are prosecuted.

They sure didn't want the auditors to see that election database.
 

My interpretation of that letter is that the "dead" voters touted by cyber ninjas were a number of people who were, in fact, not dead and the allegations were not supported by data. Correct?

Additionally, all jurisdictions have dead registrants. When people cross the rainbow bridge there's no automatic device that notifies their local voting precinct. So they're there until their registration is automatically unregistered by rule.

Editor's note: I would like to point out that I utilized they're/their/there in 3 out of 4 words in one sentence.
 
Last edited:
We replaced, as a result of an election that may have been dishonest, one complete POS with another complete POS.

You guys can hash this out for as long as you like but I feel comfortable with my habit of not voting for either POS in the presidential races

Now let me tell you a race I am interested in: the one in 2024 where Rafael Cruz has to run for re election in Texas. He almost lost to that POS Beto in 2018 and if the Democrats put up somebody who is decent, well...............Oh, never mind.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top