Forensic Audit in Maricopa County, AZ

So you can tell someone to **** off and die and you're good? You call someone dumb, you're gone? Am I getting this right?
 
OUBubba said:
So you can tell someone to f**khead off and die and you're good? You call someone dumb, you're gone? Am I getting this right?
Click to expand...
One is a direct personal attack while the other is direction. Sad that schools don't teach those distinctions anymore.
 
OUBubba said:
So you can tell someone to f**k off and die and you're good?
Click to expand...
No, that’s not cool. I haven’t seen that. I usually don’t see any of these sweet nothings you guys lovingly whisper to each other on WM until someone reports it, so please let me know and then I can address it.
 
Dionysus said:
No, that’s not cool. I haven’t seen that. I usually don’t see any of these sweet nothings you guys lovingly whisper to each other on WM until someone reports it, so please let me know and then I can address it.
Click to expand...
It was just friendly instructions, you know, between friends...
 
A tech looked at the Dominion machines and his report has been sealed by the court. Dominion machines are vulnerable, folks and the government is trying to hide it.

 
Last edited:
Just a reminder to what I said about the Dominion machines nearly a year ago.

Garmel said:
I know one thing. That Dominion rep is full of ****. That's why he said votes can't "physically" be changed by his machine. He's trying to play a word salad game. With malware applied votes can be changed. Security experts for years have been saying Dominion is vulnerable. Not saying it happened this election because we have no definite proof but the man is lying.
Click to expand...


Garmel said:
If anybody thinks my statement above is BS here is one article. There are many more if you don't believe me. Dominion rep is full of it. IT Professional, Software Expert Explains How Dominion Is Hackable – and How Georgia’s Voting Systems Are Vulnerable | News Break
Click to expand...
 
Trump won. I know it’s true because he said so. No way Biden could have won——-we couldn’t have been that stupid 8 times in a row
 
I would never want to see it happen, because I'm very much of a free speech, thought, and inquiry guy. However, if Dion told me he was going to ****-can a thread from West Mall and demanded that I make the call, this is the one I'd pick.

It's an endless parade of conjecture, rumor, and supposed evidence that nobody seems willing to test in court (at least not yet). And then when impasses inevitably are reached, a bunch of dudes in their 40s and 50s urinate on each other, and sometimes a lesbian and a Sooner come in and egg them on. Lol.

I'm not claiming any kind of superiority here. Some of that urine is mine but just being honest here - this thread is not going to make it in the "Best of West Mall" catalogue anytime soon.
 
Last edited:
Mr. Deez said:
I would never want to see it happen, because I'm very much of a free speech, thought, and inquiry guy. However, if Dion told me he was going to ****-can a thread from West Mall and demanded that I make the call, this is the one I'd pick.

It's an endless parade of conjecture, rumor, and supposed evidence that nobody seems willing to test in court (at least not yet). And then when impasses inevitably are reached, a bunch of dudes in their 40s and 50s urinate on each other, and sometimes a lesbian comes in and eggs them on. Lol.

I'm not claiming and kind of superiority here. Some of that urine is mine but just being honest here - this thread is not going to make it in the "Best of West Mall" catalogue anytime soon.
Click to expand...
It really is illustrative of where we are in our general political discourse in this day and age.
 
Mr. Deez said:
I would never want to see it happen, because I'm very much of a free speech, thought, and inquiry guy. However, if Dion told me he was going to ****-can a thread from West Mall and demanded that I make the call, this is the one I'd pick.

It's an endless parade of conjecture, rumor, and supposed evidence that nobody seems willing to test in court (at least not yet). And then when impasses inevitably are reached, a bunch of dudes in their 40s and 50s urinate on each other, and sometimes a lesbian comes in and eggs them on. Lol.

I'm not claiming and kind of superiority here. Some of that urine is mine but just being honest here - this thread is not going to make it in the "Best of West Mall" catalogue anytime soon.
Click to expand...

We have 3 investigations going in 3 different states. Yes, they will be going to court. You know these things can take months and even years to happen. Look at Durham's investigation. I'm really getting tired of every time I post something on here I have to hear **** form the crowd who thinks what we saw on election day was real.
 
Last edited:
I put up with this **** from the Trump Russian investigation. How many years did it take for me to be proven right on that case? It might take the same here. Then when I was proven right I was told that I got lucky. What the **** ever.
 
Garmel said:
We have 3 investigations going in 3 different states. Yes, they will be going to court. I'm really getting tired of every time I post something on here I have to hear **** form the crowd who thinks what we saw on election day was real.
Click to expand...

Garmel said:
I put up with this **** from the Trump Russian investigation. How many years did it take for me to be proven right on that case? It might take the same here. Then when I was proven right I was told that I got lucky. What the f**khead ever.
Click to expand...

Until it's adjudicated in court where it can be scrutinized and cross-examined, it's not going to be taken seriously by anyone who didn't believe it from the start. And yes, the same media that doesn't take this seriously have taken seriously other things that were less supported. They have a blatant double standard. However, that double standard is a reason to take unsupported claims of the media less seriously, not a reason to take unsupported claims from Mike Lindell, Trump, and others more seriously.
 
Last edited:
Mr. Deez said:
Until it's adjudicated in court where it can be scrutinized and cross-examined, it's not going to be taken seriously by anyone who didn't believe it from the start. And yes, the same media that doesn't take this seriously have taken other things that were less supported seriously. They have a blatant double standard. However, to that double standard is a reason to take unsupported claims of the media less seriously, not a reason to take unsupported claims from Mike Lindell, Trump, and others more seriously.
Click to expand...

I don't take Lindell or Trump's claims serious. Most of my claims come from the auditors themselves and an ex Wisconsin Supreme Court judge who examined Wisconsin's election and said their election was a fraud. We caught ballot harvesters on tape in the battleground states stuffing the boxes. Sorry, there's too much fire here, bud. Plus, there's stuff I can't discuss on here because I was asked not to. Making friends in high places have their benefits. Watch what happens in Arizona coming soon.
 
Garmel said:
I don't take Lindell or Trump's claims serious. Most of my claims come from the auditors themselves and an ex Wisconsin Supreme Court judge who examined Wisconsin's election and said their election was a fraud. We caught ballot harvesters on tape in the battleground states stuffing the boxes. Sorry, there's too much fire here, bud. Plus, there's stuff I can't discuss on here because I was asked not to. Making friends in high places have their benefits. Watch what happens in Arizona coming soon.
Click to expand...

If that's the case, then bring this evidence in court and let the process play out. It can be done, but if it's so solid it's surprising that no one has done so yet.
 
Mr. Deez said:
If that's the case, then bring this evidence in court and let the process play out. It can be done, but if it's so solid it's surprising that no one has done so yet.
Click to expand...

How many times have we gotten to actually examine(not talking about counting) the physical ballots or machines? That's the answer to your question. Here's how it usually goes in court. 1) Someone makes a claim 2) An election official says that didn't happen. 3) Judge agrees with the official because the plaintiff doesn't have any evidence because we aren't allowed to look at anything. This is not the case in AZ.
 
Garmel said:
How many times have we gotten to actually examine(not talking about counting) the physical ballots or machines? That's the answer to your question. Here's how it usually goes in court. 1) Someone makes a claim 2) An election official says that didn't happen. 3) Judge agrees with the official because the plaintiff doesn't have any evidence because we aren't allowed to look at anything. This is not the case in AZ.
Click to expand...

So what's the status in the Arizona litigation?
 
Garmel said:
The AG is still doing his investigation. He will releasing a report when done.
Click to expand...

But a "report" isn't a judgment especially when it's issued by a partisan figure. That's why actual litigation matters. The January 6 Committee will release a report that basically says that Trump and everybody who ever wore a MAGA hat is a latter-day Jeff Davis. Will you put much credence in it? I won't.
 
Mr. Deez said:
But a "report" isn't a judgment especially when it's issued by a partisan figure. That's why actual litigation matters. The January 6 Committee will release a report that basically says that Trump and everybody who ever wore a MAGA hat is a latter-day Jeff Davis. Will you put much credence in it? I won't.
Click to expand...

Let me say the courts will get involved after the report. The physical evidence is there and can be easily proven.
 
Garmel said:
Let me say the courts will get involved after the report. The physical evidence is there and can be easily proven.
Click to expand...

But don't you see why this doesn't inspire a lot of confidence? We're more than 15 months after the election that was supposedly stolen. We hear that there's very compelling physical evidence to prove our case, but we're not filing suit now (meaning we're not even beginning the process of adjudicating the issue) because we're waiting on some state AG to write a report? If I had lost an election under these circumstances and had compelling evidence to prove that I actually won, I would immediately publicize it and immediately sue to vindicate myself and everybody who supported my claims.

Obviously, I could be wrong, but here's what it looks like. It looks like somebody isn't so much concerned with being vindicated but wants to preserve the issue for the 2024 election. Don't establish anything conclusively through a real trier-of-fact but have headlines and news coming out of the case while the election is pending.
 
Mr. Deez said:
But don't you see why this doesn't inspire a lot of confidence? We're more than 15 months after the election that was supposedly stolen. We hear that there's very compelling physical evidence to prove our case, but we're not filing suit now (meaning we're not even beginning the process of adjudicating the issue) because we're waiting on some state AG to write a report? If I had lost an election under these circumstances and had compelling evidence to prove that I actually won, I would immediately publicize it and immediately sue to vindicate myself and everybody who supported my claims.

Obviously, I could be wrong, but here's what it looks like. It looks like somebody isn't so much concerned with being vindicated but wants to preserve the issue for the 2024 election. Don't establish anything conclusively through a real trier-of-fact but have headlines and news coming out of the case while the election is pending.
Click to expand...

So go to court with an unfished product? Investigations take time. The AG has it under investigation and the kinematic report from the auditors is not quite finished. Do you think you can forensic audit 2.1 million ballots quickly? There's a lot of bad **** here but this isn't finished quite yet.
 
Just let this all play out. In the end the truth comes out

I remember Watergate was shat all over for well over a year.. , everyone thought it was nothing more than a left wing conspiracy to take down a presidency.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top