Forensic Audit in Maricopa County, AZ

"See, he says that there was fraud, that means he has bias"
"But he said two other things that contradict what he said there"

BIAS!!!!

:lol:
 
"See, he says that there was fraud, that means he has bias"
"But he said two other things that contradict what he said there"

BIAS!!!!

:lol:

Keep up the fight man. Love a Captain willing to go down with the ship. It makes a great movie.
 
Last edited:
Keep up the fight man. Love a Captain willing to go down with the ship. It's makes a great movie.

Poor Husker. It's gonna be tough for you when you find out your MSM has lied to you and kept you in the dark to what's really happening. We've seen this happen to you several times. Just curious if you're going to disappear when you're proven wrong or go with the bias excuse. Looking forward to watching.
 
Poor Husker. It's gonna be tough for you when you find out your MSM has lied to you and kept you in the dark to what's really happening. We've seen this happen to you several times. Just curious if you're going to disappear when you're proven wrong or go with the bias excuse. Looking forward to watching.

Unlike you, I haven't left my *** waving in the wind. I've said from the beginning that I'll wait for the courts to work it out. If there is malfeasance it should be charged and a convicted. Just not willing to leap to conclusions for every claim from every Donald, Rudy or Wendy, unlike yourself. I appreciate your faith though as that's all you have to go on for the moment. Maybe it will bear fruit somewhere, anywhere giving you a solemn victory amongst 76 pages of misery. Buck up...I'm sure a nursing home aid, a D party member or grandma somewhere will get indicted giving you a molehill to crow from.

In the meantime it's just 76 pages of sadness for you to the point that even when shown a video with a quote you swore the Journalist lied about and didn't exist that you still attempted the dodge and weave approach ala Glass Joe in Mike Tyson's Punch-out.
 
Let's see, you were wrong about Rittenhouse, Summer of Love, IRS, etcc. Who knows? This might be the one time you might be right. You're overdue. Just think of yourself as the Little Engine that Could, "I think I can, I think I can".
 
Let's see, you were wrong about Rittenhouse, Summer of Love, IRS, etcc. Who knows? This might be the one time you might be right. You're overdue. Just think of yourself as the Little Engine that Could, "I think I can, I think I can".

What was I wrong about on Rittenhouse? That he travelled across state lines with a gun? If that's all you have to counter 76 pages then I feel even more sorry for you.

Summer of Love wasn't my quote but you're well accustomed to swallowing things...narratives, that weren't advanced by me. IRS? Keep trying Glass Joe. At some point you'll land a punch.
 
IRS? Keep trying Glass Joe


From a few years ago
Husker, if my memory serves me didn't you say the exact things during the IRS scandal? Was it or was it not a "conspiracy theory" that turned out to be true?

I've had my mea culpa for that story here. Not sure you want to compare the success rate of right wing conspiracy theories advanced on this board.

Why did you say that you did a mea culpa if you weren't wrong? You lie to yourself and others so much you don't even know what the truth is.
 
From a few years ago




Why did you say that you did a mea culpa if you weren't wrong? You lie to yourself and others so much you don't even know what the truth is.

Thanks for the reminder on the IRS. I admitted I was wrong then and have no problem still admitting it. Keep swinging brother. In 100% honesty I do hope that you find a morsel, something anywhere that you can hang your hat on for "fraud" because I worry about your psyche if not. At that point you're full-on QAnon if at the end you can't admit you were led on a wild goose chase.
 
What was I wrong about on Rittenhouse? That he travelled across state lines with a gun? If that's all you have to counter 76 pages then I feel even more sorry for you.

Summer of Love wasn't my quote but you're well accustomed to swallowing things...narratives, that weren't advanced by me.

You said Rittenhouse went down there looking for trouble. Video proves otherwise. During the Summer of Love you were using disinformation articles to try to downplay the Summer of Love. I don't know who you are trying to convince with your BS because I don't think anybody believes it. Your track record speaks for itself. You know damn well you were wrong about the IRS but you tried to BS until I showed the posts.
 
Let me break this down for you Glass Joe.

You said Rittenhouse went down there looking for trouble. Video proves otherwise.

Is that a fact or an opinion? Your opinion against my opinion. There is evidence on BOTH sides to support the opinions. Yes, Rittenhouse stupidly put himself IN the trouble. He was found innocent of murder. I can live with the verdict even if I think the prosecution was horribly incompetent and the judge less than fair. He's innocent though.

During the Summer of Love you were using disinformation articles to try to downplay the Summer of Love.

LOL! I gave a second hand account of what my son, his friend and a former coworker (who is a VP @ Amazon) experienced. "Disinformation"...an accusation coming from someone who lives in Texas or Oklahoma on what was occurring in Seattle. Read that again...and again...and again.

I don't know who you are trying to convince with your BS because I don't think anybody believes it. Your track record speaks for itself. You know damn well you were wrong about the IRS but you tried to BS until I showed the posts.

To be honest, I'm a little bit sadistic when it comes to debating the intellectually challenged. We should all be challenged, including the ignorant and idiots. I've never gone all in like you have on stolen election thought. Seriously, if you could simply acknowledge the difference between a claim and evidence that would show progress. You're not into progress though as evidenced by the past 76 pages.

I do need to hand it to you, this is the first time that you've actually brought a little evidence to a debate. Typically it's just @Garmel is right more often and @Seattle Husker just believes the MSM. Kudos to bringing a pocket knife along this time.
 
Last edited:
Let me break this down for you Glass Joe.



Is that a fact or an opinion? Your opinion against my opinion. There is evidence on BOTH sides to support the opinions. Yes, Rittenhouse stupidly put himself IN the trouble. He was found innocent of murder. I can live with the verdict even if I think the prosecution was horribly incompetent and the judge less than fair. He's innocent though.



LOL! I gave a second hand account of what my son, his friend and a former coworker (who is a VP @ Amazon) experienced. "Disinformation"...an accusation coming from someone who lives in Texas or Oklahoma on what was occurring in Seattle. Read that again...and again...and again.



To be honest, I'm a little bit sadistic when it comes to debating the intellectually challenged. We should all be challenged, including the ignorant and idiots. I've never gone all in like you have on stolen election thought. Seriously, if you could simply acknowledge the difference between a claim and evidence that would show progress. You're not into progress though as evidenced by the past 76 pages.

Your whole viewpoint toward Rittenhouse was proven false. Anybody that goes back and reads your posts can see it. Your BS doesn't change it.

Sorry, but your sources on Seattle were wrong. Even from Texas I could see that it was a violent insurrection. You were hilariously wrong again.

The intellectually challenged? lol. If you understood the difference between claims and evidence your track record would be so much better.
 
Last edited:
Your whole viewpoint toward Rittenhouse was proven false. Anybody that goes back and reads your posts can see it. Your BS doesn't change it.

How is a "viewpoint" wrong? Just because I focus on different facts that you?

Sorry, but your sources on Seattle were wrong. Even from Texas I can see that it was a violent insurrection. You were hilariously wrong again.

Are you really this dense? Too many concussions maybe? I suggest you re-read actually what I posted, when I posted it and every caveat I included. Outside of that I fear you may be responding to me from a padded cell.

The intellectually challenged? lol. If you understood the difference between claims and evidence your track record would be so much better.

Unlike you as demonstrated over and over and over on this thread, I'm very clear when something is a claim and when it's proven/vetted. It's why I typically (not in the IRS situation) say wait until the court case to vet any information. As opposed you walk into the thread, slap your micropenis on the table, and exclaim everything fact, vetting be damned. Then when the actual court losses are cited you dodge and weave Glass Joe style.
 
How is a "viewpoint" wrong? Just because I focus on different facts that you?



Are you really this dense? Too many concussions maybe? I suggest you re-read actually what I posted, when I posted it and every caveat I included. Outside of that I fear you may be responding to me from a padded cell.



Unlike you as demonstrated over and over and over on this thread, I'm very clear when something is a claim and when it's proven/vetted. It's why I typically (not in the IRS situation) say wait until the court case to vet any information. As opposed you walk into the thread, slap your micropenis on the table, and exclaim everything fact, vetting be damned. Then when the actual court losses are cited you dodge and weave Glass Joe style.

Facts on Rittenhouse? You said that claims don't equal evidence yet here you are. You made claims, bud. Not evidence/facts. Your "facts" were effed up.

Watching you trying to backtrack on the Seattle situation is hilarious. We saw and read what you wrote. Maybe if your sources were better you wouldn't have effed this up.

The court cases? The ones where we basically took the word of election officials and never looked at anything?

Micropenis? You know what they say about libs and their ability to self project. You having a micropenis would explain a lot.
 
Facts on Rittenhouse? You said that claims don't equal evidence yet here you are. You made claims, bud. Not evidence/facts. Your "facts" were effed up.

Watching you trying to backtrack on the Seattle situation is hilarious. We saw and read what you wrote. Maybe if your sources were better you wouldn't have effed this up.

The court cases? The ones where we basically took the word of election officials and never looked at anything?

Micropenis? You know what they say about libs and their ability to self project. You having a micropenis would explain a lot.

Dodge and weave, dodge and weave Glass Joe.
 
Garm
So there is complaining about the use of "summer of love "?
Maybe "street festival" rings a bell
Was there an admission that there were riots burning destruction raping and murder going on?
Or that Rittenhouse did Not cross state lines with a gun?
 
LOL! I gave a second hand account of what my son, his friend and a former coworker (who is a VP @ Amazon) experienced. "Disinformation"...an accusation coming from someone who lives in Texas or Oklahoma on what was occurring in Seattle. Read that again...and again...and again.

Is that the same Amazon that JUST ANNOUNCED a closure of an office in Seattle because of *checks notes* high crime which endangered its employees?

Asking for a friend...
 
The personal attacks showing up in this thread seem to be casting quite the shadow on the ToS that everyone, including non-sponsors, have agreed to abide by...
 
The personal attacks showing up in this thread seem to be casting quite the shadow on the ToS that everyone, including non-sponsors, have agreed to abide by...
Aaaand, I knew I shouldn't have looked at the ignored content on this page, but like cruising past a flaming car wreck on the interstate I had to slow down and rubberneck. Well, all I can say is this page reinforced why I have certain idoits on ignore in the first place.
 
I was at the annual MSM get together where it was agreed to just make up a bunch of lies about that Nice Mr Trump. And to participate in the fraudulent election. And I spent three days in the cemetery filling out mail in ballots with names off the tombstones. One of the guys I assisted in casting his ballot was a Confederate veteran who died in 1892

I let him vote straight Republican but the rest were Democrats
 
Much like you @Sangre Naranjada, I made the mistake a few times of viewing ignored content on a few of these threads . I seem to remember someone being told to *checks notes* **** off and die. So, I agree (twice now) with mb, that kind of poor behavior is uncalled for.

I would also point out this thread led me to block one more foolish, stubborn individual. Pour one out for him.
lwayd0iyhj29si7l.jpg
 
Garm
So there is complaining about the use of "summer of love "?
Maybe "street festival" rings a bell
Was there an admission that there were riots burning destruction raping and murder going on?
Or that Rittenhouse did Not cross state lines with a gun?

Only a **** For Brains type would walk by that cesspool in Seattle and call it "summer of Love"
 
Last edited:
FIFY

Only a **** For Brains type would make up the quote "summer of Love" and attributed it to others

Of course I would never infer you are the person who made up the quote. Now, attributing it to me does make you a ******* liar but I don't make any judgement on what you have for brains.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top