Stop playing ignorant. Look at what I posted and deal with facts. **Mack was far more accomplished prior coming to Texas than Sarkisian**. If sark had any success whatsoever prior to coming here, you'd post it up. But you can't.
First, Mack had 14 years of coaching experience before coming to Texas and Sark had 6.
Sark took a dumpster fire program who won 12 games in its previous 5 seasons to 35 wins and 4 bowls in his 5 seasons. Except for his 9-4 season and holiday bowl win at USC while being a massive alcoholic that's all of his HC experience prior to Texas.
In comparison Mack took over a team who won 30 games in the 5 years before his arrival while in his first 5 years at UNC he only won 25 games. What? You don't even want to look at his ****** records at Tulane and Appy St.
Mack had 3 ten win seasons in his first 17 years so get off your high horse and stop comparing Sark to Mack because Mack wasn't some type of instant savant success. Early on he was a snake oil salesman who could talk anyone into anything and learned over time to be a good coach. You want to know why he only won 2 conference championships his entire 35 year and counting head coaching career? Because he could never win the ones that mattered until he did...twice and a natty with VY. But he did rack up a lot of nice wins over the years.
We all know that Sark took over a politically divided dumpster fire of a Texas program and had to clean that up first. Mack inherited a heisman winning running back who set the all time rushing record.
Facts.
Last edited: