Election Night

Dems really do live in the NE population bubble, plus other big cities where the American experience is, sadly, warped.
Sangre, add to that the West Coast states (Washington, Oregon, California) - same warped values. And include Colorado - the liberals have turned Colorado into the "California of the Rockies," Colorado has changed a lot since I graduated there in 1968.
 
And BTW - what's taking California so long to report winners in their Congressional races? Are the Democrats deploying teams to the cemeteries to get the votes they need?
 
And BTW - what's taking California so long to report winners in their Congressional races? Are the Democrats deploying teams to the cemeteries to get the votes they need?


A few of those House races in CA are in hard core conservative areas and are pretty much a lock for the Republican candidate to win. I'm not sure they have a way to cheat enough to win those. We should have 220+ in the house once everything is finished.
 
CA definitely needs to update their counting procedures - this is ridiculous time span. The rest of the states were done within hours or a couple of days.
 
IMG_3457.jpeg
 


Not really. It's only about 10 points off from the Election Day voting. If they're going to cheat for Baldwin, why not cheat for Harris and let her carry the state? It seems more likely that there were probably a few points of voters who split their tickets.
 
Last edited:
Not really. It's only about 10 points off from the Election Day voting. A and of they're going to cheat for Baldwin, why not cheat for Harris and let her carry the state? It seems more likely that there were probably a few points of voters who split their tickets.

That 4am drop did carry a lot of Harris votes but not enough to overcome Trump but it did overcome Hovde.

Any drop that is over 100K and over 90% for one party is highly suspicious although I admit we can't say for sure it's fraud.
 
Here's the Hovde race in graph form. See the strange spike.

GcHmiO3XQAApALy



Here's Trump's race in Wisconsin where he survived the 4am spike.

GcN25XlX0AAVN3e



These spikes always go one way and you don't see them even in the reddest of counties. I know of a conservative guy with a doctorate in stats that will tell you this is impossible without fraud.

These spikes were seen in the 2020 election as well.
 
Last edited:
That 4am drop did carry a lot of Harris votes but not enough to overcome Trump but it did overcome Hovde.

Any drop that is over 100K and over 90% for one party is highly suspicious although I admit we can't say for sure it's fraud.

Even if the election day ballots were also a blowout, even if not quite as much?
 
Didn't he say in the 80s? Or did I mishear that?

I don't think it was quite that high. I haven't checked.

If you look at the graph that I posted above above there are no insane spikes for Trump. As I said even the reddest counties don't produce them.

When you see spikes that are almost completely vertical that is a cause for concern and they are always helping the dems.
 
Garm
Amazing coincidence isn't it ?
That going back to 2020 All middle of the night counting and huge late ballot dumps always favor Dems.
 
Here's the Hovde race in graph form. See the strange spike.

GcHmiO3XQAApALy



Here's Trump's race in Wisconsin where he survived the 4am spike.

GcN25XlX0AAVN3e



These spikes always go one way and you don't see them even in the reddest of counties. I know of a conservative guy with a doctorate in stats that will tell you this is impossible without fraud.

These spikes were seen in the 2020 election as well.
As I said right before the election this race is BS. Soros backs a conservative independent to take votes away from Hovde, then they realize that's still not enough so they dump extra votes in the middle of the night. And they call Republicans fascists.
 
Figured you'd go for a Bud Light lol

Dems really are strange in that they can't figure out what the general population cares about.
Because they don't care what the great unwashed thinks or cares about, they are supposed to be in lockstep.
But why not investigate?
The investigators will be the same people that "helped" fill out those ballots; besides, they will be too busy drinking free expensive alcohol while celebrating their "victory".
 
Going on two weeks in and even though we have claimed the house with 218 seats, there are still FOUR seats not yet decided with the republican candidate leading in all four races. Are they trying to steal these four to keep it close?

Alaska 1, 94% reported, R Nick Begich leads by 9,100+ votes
CA 13, 86% reported, R John Duarte leads by 2,000+ votes
CA 45, 93% reported, R Michelle Steele leads by 58 votes
IA 1, 99% reported, R Mariannette Miller-Meeks leads by 801 votes

I feel no matter what, we should claim at least 3 of these 4 giving us 221 seats, but what are the odds 3 or 4 of them will be delayed until the D wins?
 
Do any of you who don't believe in election fraud ever become suspicious of these antics? Hopefully a solid red area will come up soon.


 
Going on two weeks in and even though we have claimed the house with 218 seats, there are still FOUR seats not yet decided with the republican candidate leading in all four races. Are they trying to steal these four to keep it close?

Alaska 1, 94% reported, R Nick Begich leads by 9,100+ votes
CA 13, 86% reported, R John Duarte leads by 2,000+ votes
CA 45, 93% reported, R Michelle Steele leads by 58 votes
IA 1, 99% reported, R Mariannette Miller-Meeks leads by 801 votes

I feel no matter what, we should claim at least 3 of these 4 giving us 221 seats, but what are the odds 3 or 4 of them will be delayed until the D wins?

In CA 45 the dem took the lead by 36 votes with now 94% reported.

Alaska 1 is now 98% and Begich lead is down to 8,400 votes
 
Do any of you who don't believe in election fraud ever become suspicious of these antics? Hopefully a solid red area will come up soon.




It's a Democratic-leaning district, so I'm not shocked that the Republican might lose, but anytime it takes several days or weeks to count ballots, I'm suspicious. Furthermore, with the California Legislature giving Democrats every voting procedure they want with little accountability, every close election there should be met with some degree of skepticism.
 
It's a Democratic-leaning district, so I'm not shocked that the Republican might lose, but anytime it takes several days or weeks to count ballots, I'm suspicious. Furthermore, with the California Legislature giving Democrats every voting procedure they want with little accountability, every close election there should be met with some degree of skepticism.

Yep, and most of the time when these counts last for days/weeks the democrats have a strong tendency to win.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top