Unfiltered, of course.Camel. Definitely.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unfiltered, of course.Camel. Definitely.
They act like this is a gotcha. But our heath outcomes don't rank the same way. We are better and worse than other countries. Most if which has to do with other health factors completely unrelated to vaxx numbers.
I would agree to some extent. I would bet our mortality figures are worse than Russia's.
Natural Immunity Superior to Vaccination Against Delta Virus Variant: Study
Published by the CDC, no less.
So why all the vax mandates?
WHAT window of time? You continue doing like the rest of the CDC idiots and throwing half-assed data points without actually GIVING the data. You will THEN accuse people of misrepresenting the misrepresentations you yourself tossed out...Here are some real world stats from the northern territories. In a world where 1 would mean that the figures are the same in the population per 1000 person (but they're Okies, so adjust your cyphering accordingly).
Cases: 13.9/x
ER visits: 15.3x
Inpatient Admission: 15.8x
ICU Admission: 23.6x
Death 18-35: 69x
Death 36-49: 53x
Death 50-64: 23x
Death 65+: 12x
Who knows. We've got psyops all over the internet. Deep fakes are out there. If it IS real, then more news will eventually come out. I believe the vaccines are dangerous. There is a lot of evidence that points to this. I know that is an unpopular opinion. But, evidence stands on its own. And the opinion is more popular now than a year ago or more. Somehow evidence has to be mainstream and that is what's being censored.AC is that real?
Boy, you sure said something there, partner.Who knows. We've got psyops all over the internet.
Sadly, I expect he will 'suggest' that the Hair Sniifer in Chief close the US borders to anyone flying from the UK or who holds a UK passport.UK lifting COVID restrictions by March 10 seems to come out of nowhere.
Wonder what Fauci et al will say now?
"The unvaccinated without prior infection were by far the most likely to contract COVID-19 and require hospital care, the study found."
It seems to me then it's a conscious decision not to vax and instead walk around waiting to be a carrier until you're well after catching it. In the meantime, you have to decide whether or not your decision to catch it (or not worry about catching it; meaning it's not a deliberate act to catch it) will put others at risk including hospital workers who may be forced to treat you.
I had a reply in mind, then saw Nash's post #12,469 ( 2 down from yours). Said it all, right there.
I respect your opinion, but disagree.
"The unvaccinated without prior infection were by far the most likely to contract COVID-19 and require hospital care, the study found."
I don't know that vaxxed and unvaxxed have an equal potential to catch it. Both can, but I would guess they have significantly different rates. Also, you're told to stay home now if you catch it too. They shortened the timeframe as they learned more about the virus.But By the point is even vaxxed you’re walking around with an equal potential to catch it and therefore pass it to another. I guess you’re saying the likely hood of serious infection is lowered for the vaxxed? But then they, just like the healthy who catch it and never know it, will unknowingly pass it on. In the 20’s when you tested positive you were told stay home. You either recovered or went to ER when symptoms demanded. Today they recognize treatment immediately for a positive test. Very different approach and very different results.
For me the scariest thing right now is the impending approval to vax infants. That disturbs me.
No, they shortened the timeframe to make it more politically palatable. Every step they take these days is based on political considerations first, and medical considerations second (if at all).They shortened the timeframe as they learned more about the virus.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC