OUBubba
5,000+ Posts
We are getting it in a few weeks. I hope that I will have had the second dose by New Years.Pfizer supposed to apply for emergency approval of their vaccine today.
Could be distributed before end of 2020
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are getting it in a few weeks. I hope that I will have had the second dose by New Years.Pfizer supposed to apply for emergency approval of their vaccine today.
Could be distributed before end of 2020
Won't that go against your Dem talking points fi its being rushed unsafely to market the chaotic and dysfunctional Trump circus? How will you reconcile that amongst your peers?We are getting it in a few weeks. I hope that I will have had the second dose by New Years.
Whatever you say...of course the Trump Administration had nothing to do with it. Of course. Why would you say otherwise?I trust the science and the Trump administration had little to do with this and didn't twist arms to get it approved.
Whatever you say...of course the Trump Administration had nothing to do with it. Of course. Why would you say otherwise?
Your trolling is very predictable these days.
Troll on...
Yep, and I'm sure he'll eventually reply, but if not, that's even better. But, I guarandamntee he and his ilk would blame Trump if no vaccine was imminent.This and acting like the current Mideast peace plan is no deal. Thankfully, most Americans are better informed than what Bubba is.
Yep, and I'm sure he'll eventually reply, but if not, that's even better. But, I guarandamntee he and his ilk would blame Trump if no vaccine was imminent.
Can you specifically point out which science you support? It’s all contradicting. Happy to debate if interested.I trust the science and the Trump administration had little to do with this and didn't twist arms to get it approved.
95%. The docs I talk to say that this is a no brainer and they’re excited to get it. I’ve known them for 15-25 years.Can you specifically point out which science you support? It’s all contradicting. Happy to debate if interested.
ICUs and covid units in Oklahoma are full, or were full as of yesterday and off and on all week.I have read that the COVID hotspots right now are caused by detecting dead COVID RNA in people in the Corn/Soy belt of the US. The soil is recharged with processed human waste. It is heated to kill the virus but the RNA stays in tact, so the detections aren't of an infection per se.
At the same time there does seem to be a resurgence looking at ICU and death. If only we would have let healthy people get infected and recover in the Spring. Then they (most of us) would be active virus killing machines protecting the truly susceptible. Governments didn't allow us to do that, so now the virus will kill more of the old and sick.
Who benefits from lockdowns?
Who loses?
California- curfew from 10 pm to 5 am state wide
What do you want to bet this does not apply to Newsome and staff, or his lawyers and lobbyists?
We should definitely listen to them and follow their advice.Initially, WHO insisted that there was no asymptomatic transmission.
Months later, CDC came out and said that maybe 25% of asymptomatics spread it.
Then it was 50%
Now? Now the CDC says most coronavirus infections are spread by people without symptoms
“CDC and others estimate that more than 50% of all infections are transmitted from people who are not exhibiting symptoms"
The vaccines? Sorry not following. I don’t doubt the vaccines are 95% effective. If I were compromised, I would be first in line. Since I am not, I will wait to see the side effects. And all foreign substances you put in your body have side effects.95%. The docs I talk to say that this is a no brainer and they’re excited to get it. I’ve known them for 15-25 years.
We should have a scientific study on this by now. Enough time has transpired for us to know if this is true with a rct. CDC has been guessing for months. Years of proven scientific protocols thrown out the window. They are acting like an elementary science class not a world leading health organization.Initially, WHO insisted that there was no asymptomatic transmission.
Months later, CDC came out and said that maybe 25% of asymptomatics spread it.
Then it was 50%
Now? Now the CDC says most coronavirus infections are spread by people without symptoms
“CDC and others estimate that more than 50% of all infections are transmitted from people who are not exhibiting symptoms"
I think the asymptomatic spread is what differentiates this from flu, h1n1, etc.We should have a scientific study on this by now. Enough time has transpired for us to know if this is true with a rct. CDC has been guessing for months. Years of proven scientific protocols thrown out the window. They are acting like an elementary science class not a world leading health organization.
And this actual study contradicts the CDC.
![]()
Luigi did it
Serious question. Is there verifiable proof of asymptomatic spread? How do they know?I think the asymptomatic spread is what differentiates this from flu, h1n1, etc.
The first case was identified in Germany from a chinese consultant who did a training and came up sick 4 days later upon returning to China. A handful of people in the seminar popped positive after that. A scientist rang the bell but it was somewhat ignored. Now we could certainly say it should be studied more.Serious question. Is there verifiable proof of asymptomatic spread? How do they know?