Horns11
10,000+ Posts
During the the 2018-2019 flu season, 647,000 people were hospitalized and 61,200 died in the United States from the flu. Covid-19, by comparison, has resulted in 337,062 hospitalizations (fewer than the flu) and and 165,328 deaths in the United States. Covid-19 is comparable to a bad recent flu season. It has killed about 2.5 times as many as the flu does in a year. It mainly kills those over 80, and those over 60 with some other serious condition - just like the a normal flu does.
Covid-19 is not even comparable to the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic where 50 million people died worldwide, with a much smaller world population. The world population in 1918 was 1.8 billion, resulting in a death rate of 2.7% of the world's population.
By contrast, COVID-19 has killed 744,733 people worldwide out of a total of 7.8 billion people in the world in 2020, resulting in a death rate of 0.01% of the world's population. There are many other things that kill more way more than 700K people worldwide every year. For example, heart disease kills 17.9 million people worldwide every year.
We don't shut everything down, or stop playing football games, for the flu, nor should we. We should all take precautions, but not stop playing football games, or living our lives.
Something to consider about the current state of things is that we have those Covid numbers with the restrictions in place (face masks, social distancing, people working from home, cancelling weddings or other activities, etc.). So how bad would the flu have been if those measures were in place? Or, to put it in a dark way, how bad would Covid be without those measures in place?