Anyone watch Democrat convention?

dukesteer said:
Sometimes I actually wonder if the Dems really want to win this year. I know. It’s a crazy take. But look at their candidates...

There is not an individual in this country that can honestly deny the obvious with Biden: He is mentally compromised, and eroding quickly. I lost all respect for Mark Cuban when he denied that fact on Hannity perhaps six weeks ago.

Harris brings nothing to the table. Not likability. Not charisma. She’s a poor speaker. Tons of baggage. She projects nastiness. I wonder why?

My philosophy is that the more likable candidate always wins. Likability can be defined many ways including being someone with whom you would have a beer:

That’s Clinton, not Bush 1.
That’s Bush 2, not Gore.
That’s Obama, not McCain or Romney.
And that’s Trump, not Hillary.

In fact, look at every election back to 1960. It’s hard to argue the likability angle.

BIden is a complete doofus but he was “likable.” The operative word is “was.” He’s a shell of his former self, and one
massive meltdown away from oblivion.

Love him or hate him, Trump is a media genius. He’s just plain entertaining, and that alone will serve him well on 11/3.
Click to expand...

Well as most people here know I am not a fan of Trump (gotten alot of flack lol). I agree with you on this but I would like to add:

The Dems don't want to win because they can't. They can't find a candidate within their party because they don't have a clear ideology. You have the moderates and socialists fighting each other. The old Dems are getting the big middle finger from AOC, Bernie, Pocahontas supporters. There have been some bad tickets in presidential history but I think Joe and the Hoe is the worst in my opinion.
 
WillUSAF said:
Well as most people here know I am not a fan of Trump (gotten alot of flack lol). I agree with you on this but I would like to add:

The Dems don't want to win because they can't. They can't find a candidate within their party because they don't have a clear ideology. You have the moderates and socialists fighting each other. The old Dems are getting the big middle finger from AOC, Bernie, Pocahontas supporters. There have been some bad tickets in presidential history but I think Joe and the Hoe is the worst in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Will, FWIW, I spent my entire adult life — once I knew of Donald Trump, despising him. Thought he was as big of an a**hat and narcissist as I had even known. Then something changed for me around the summer of 2016. With all of his obvious flaws, he seemed to also have unique qualities, one of which being unusual intuition.

Yes, I was disgusted by the comment about McCain — and Trump ultimately paid a heavy price for that indiscretion (the thumb down vote) - the guy obviously has extraordinary instincts. My respect has only grown, now to a point that I tend to discount virtually every negative story about him because so many have been disproven.

On to the Democrats, while their bullpen is not strong, they do have talent. The problem is that the left/radical wing of the party has taken over. It’s terrible. And the best thing that could happen to the party — for its survival — and the country would be a devastating loss in November.

We need a two party system but we cannot survive as a nation if many of the ideas on display from “this” Democrat party ever become mainstream.
 
duke
Really great post
Yes this. "The problem is that the left/radical wing of the party has taken over." It is also the media and hollywood and those entities influence so many.
I honestly am surprised Trump even has any positive numbers.
 
mchammer said:
Hui, isn’t it a little late in the day to be sober? You are usually long gone by now. :beertoast:
Click to expand...

Speaking of sobriety, I found a new house in the UK tonight, so I had some of both of these.

rps20200820_221955.jpg
 
We already have a 3rd party. The far left wing of the democrat party.

Should Joe lose, how long will Nancy be allowed to keep her power in the party? Blood bath on the horizon.
 
Horn6721 said:
For anyone who hates Trump and will vote 3rd party to "send a message" would you take a chance the Dem party could gain more power
Convicted Rapist, Torturer and Killer Who Squeezed Her Victim's Testicles with Pliers Speaks at DNC as "Impactful Community Leader"

and we can't forget Black Panther Assata Shakur who is a convicted cop killer and is quoted often by Dems.
Yea that is who we want to run the country so throw away your vote .
Click to expand...
I don't necessarily think that if someone votes 3rd party it's to "send a message". I know ALOT of Libertarians (myself included probably) and they vote L not for hatred but agreeing to a different platform.

I almost can't believe they let her speak but then again its the Dems.....:rolleyes1:
 
I didn’t realize how good a president could be till Trump. The guy is all about results and gets so much done. He seeks out things that need fixing from crushing ISIS, slapping No Korea, NATO, Iran, China, to Exec order Stimulus etc..None of the personality bothers me-Saban is an *** too sometimes. They both win. And if he wins a second term hold on to your hats.
Besides If your seriously voting Biden, your brain is actually more cooked than Biden’s.
 
It's not a big shock that Biden would give a good convention speech. Like Trump, he can give a strong speech when he's on teleprompter. His weakness is when he's unscripted, which is different for Trump. He's stronger unscripted than Biden is. Of course, Trump's big weakness shows when he's got the Twitter app running while he's sitting on the toilet.
 
Thanks Deez
Now I can't get that image out of ny head.
All Day:puke:

I'd still rather have that image than the nightmare of Biden et al winning
 
I didn't realize that Kasich was instrumental in stopping and capping production of the B2 during
Clinton years. Repubs wanted 40. Kasich worked to stop it at 20.
China and Russia say thanks
 
Horn6721 said:
I didn't realize that Kasich was instrumental in stopping and capping production of the B2 during
Clinton years. Repubs wanted 40. Kasich worked to stop it at 20.
China and Russia say thanks
Click to expand...
I didn't know that either. But honestly, do we really need 40? The cost of making 1 was $2.1 billion!! We have the greatest arsenal in the world when it comes to aircraft.
 
Horn6721 said:
I didn't realize that Kasich was instrumental in stopping and capping production of the B2 during
Clinton years. Repubs wanted 40. Kasich worked to stop it at 20.
China and Russia say thanks
Click to expand...

The B-2 had significant problems, and the Soviet Union had collapsed. It was not at all unreasonable to slow down orders of it until its problems could be worked out. Kasich was right.
 
WillUSAF said:
I didn't know that either. But honestly, do we really need 40? The cost of making 1 was $2.1 billion!! We have the greatest arsenal in the world when it comes to aircraft.
Click to expand...

We might need 40 now. Did we need 40 in the mid-'90s when the plane had design defects? No.
 
Mr. Deez said:
We might need 40 now. Did we need 40 in the mid-'90s when the plane had design defects? No.
Click to expand...
I agree with you when the plane had defects (all of them do) that we didn't need 40 but I'm still not convinced that we need 40 bombers even now. The conflicts we fight now and what I see in the future we need close air support (i.e. F22, F35)....

6721 is right also, he was protecting the jobs in Ohio with the B1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top