2024 GOP Primary

I think there's a lot of truth to this, but I also think there's a unity of contempt at play. I think a lot of well-meaning liberals are deferential to the hard left crazies with bad intentions, because they harbor hostility for those who oppose the hard left crazies. It's what explains why they'll promote gender ideology in the morning and then fetishize Islamic fundamentalism in the afternoon, even though the latter wants all of them stoned to death or decapitated.
Yes, the bleeding heart people do give license to the radicals to annoy or try to destroy the “meanies” on the right who don’t want to fund their latest ideas, but what I am saying is that the bleeding heart people, if they really thought about it, don’t want to bring the whole house down. (They just don’t think about it; they are like the immature children in the back seat who just take for granted that the parents in the front seat will make sure the car gets there.) On the other hand, the radicals actually want to pull the whole house down. For them to have any moral content at all, I assume they imagine (yes, “Imagine”) they would create a wonderful new society after that. Of course, that is completely naive, because in the aftermath of a societal breakdown, the most horrible types of governments take over in the chaos.
 
Nikki developed RBF from all the stress:
nikki-haley-1-rt-bb-240306_1709737782365_hpMain_4x3t.jpg


Nikki Haley suspends 2024 campaign, doesn't endorse Donald Trump
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but those in Travis County remain blissfully beholden to the Trotskyite cause.
Ha! Trostsky.

I've heard the pitch multiple times from far left acquaintances, and article writers, over the years: Stalin was bad, but Trotsky was good. If only Trotsky had won out over Stalin, then the Soviet Union would have succeeded. Now it's true that Trotsky was actually an effective military leader early on, and unequalled at organizing and enflaming the masses through his speeches.

The bigger problem is the inherent flaws in a command and control / socialist economy. Not even the best managers, or fiery and eloquent speakers, can make that work in the long run.

bg,f8f8f8-flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ha! Trostsky.

I've heard the pitch multiple times from far left acquaintances, and article writers, over the years: Stalin was bad, but Trotsky was good. If only Trotsky had won out over Stalin, then the Soviet Union would have succeeded. Now it's true that Trotsky was actually an effective military leader early on, and unequalled at organizing and enflaming the masses through his speeches.

The bigger problem is the inherent flaws in a command and control / socialist economy. Not even the best managers, or fiery and eloquent speakers, can make that work in the long run.

bg,f8f8f8-flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.jpg
Could Beavis be the Great, great grandson of Trotsky?

grant5.jpg

latest
 
Dems are in denial. They are in their bubble. Because of this, they won’t replace Biden because those fools actually think Biden will win.
 
Why does Trump keep saying stupid stuff, regardless of what he means? Doesn't he know he keeps turning off moderates? Can't he ever try to be the nice guy?
MSN
 
Uh oh, looks like your HF account has been hacked. No way you would fall for MSM lies.
I guess I need to back up and explain my caveat. You, I and MC know what he really said, but we also know what the MSM is going to do with this. You can see it now, "TRUMP ADVOCATING VIOLENCE AND INSURRECTION". That's exactly how the sheeple will see it and I've been around people that won't vote for Trump because "he's mean". Why do you want to turn off any voters in an election where he needs every possible vote, especially with all the cheating that's coming?

And this. What does he have to alienate even more voters by attacking DeSantis? And why there are threads of Republican voters in Civil War elsewhere which turns off even more voters. Why can't he just say, "Ron is a good guy, but the people want me and we're united on that"??
 
I guess I need to back up and explain my caveat. You, I and MC know what he really said, but we also know what the MSM is going to do with this. You can see it now, "TRUMP ADVOCATING VIOLENCE AND INSURRECTION". That's exactly how the sheeple will see it and I've been around people that won't vote for Trump because "he's mean". Why do you want to turn off any voters in an election where he needs every possible vote, especially with all the cheating that's coming?

And this. What does he have to alienate even more voters by attacking DeSantis? And why there are threads of Republican voters in Civil War elsewhere which turns off even more voters. Why can't he just say, "Ron is a good guy, but the people want me and we're united on that"??

Trump knows the media better than we do. He’s not going to change. He assumes the American people will eventually get what the media is doing.
 
Back
Top