zuckercanyon
2,500+ Posts
Don't think we're Sugar Ray yet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
May not be Roberto Duran, yet, either!Don't think we're Sugar Ray yet.
You thought as the game went on “they aren’t hardly better than we are “....did you watch the game ??
Ou completely dominated the LOS on both sides of the ball .
Offensively they averaged almost 7.5 yards a carry for over 275 yards .
They averaged a ridiculous 14.7 yards a reception in through the air .
Defensively they had NINE sacks , and 15 tackles for a loss .
Out of the 71 snaps taken for Texas ,24 went for negative yardage , that’s over 1/3 of your offensive snaps .....1/3 for negative plays .
Texas averaged a mere 2.8 a carry .If you take out the one long run ....1 and some change a carry.
I guess can’t see how anyone that knows
anything about football could think those two teams were equal ???
Had ou somehow lost ( two or three more turnovers )They would still be double digit favorites in the big 12 championship game .
Again it was complete domination on on both sides of the ball .
The equalizer was the turn overs, where Texas actually won 3-0 ( fumble , int , and a turnover on downs )
Not to mention all three where on the
Texas side , two in red zone , one on the 39.
When I’m saw the 10.5 point spread I thought Vegas had lost their minds but they had in right .
They can’t account for multiple turnovers in scoring position . They go by talent , film and some times + and - just to even out bets .
That’s not an issue with Texas /OU plenty of public money on both sides .
Vegas believed OU was much better than Texas and they were right , they honestly may have undervalued OU.
Texas and the points won but it was still the wrong bet , just like the team they were lucky it wasn’t a blow out .
If they meet again and both teams have relatively the same players as first meeting( no major injuries ) , it will probably be higher ...like 13-14 range .
I was responding to the idea that we had supposedly outrecruited OU recently,...
Would like to disagree with you but until we get deep with recruiting top talent, we'll have a tough time upending OU for the conference title.....
I don't know what is worse, reading the sooner's flawed takes or Joe's crying. ....
That's exactly what I'm saying. 1900 is not the first year of the 20th. 1901 was the first!Actually, we were right the first time because unlike a number line, neither the Julian nor Gregorian calendar has a zero year (look it up). So 1 B.C. was followed by 1 A.D. hence 10 A.D. was the tenth year ofthe first decade, 100 A.D. was the last year of the first Century and 2000 A.D. was the final year of the 20th Century.
Thus the second decade began in 11 A.D., the second Century began in 101 A.D. and the 21st Century began in 2001 A.D.
I would call that a win-win
That's exactly what I'm saying. 1900 is not the first year of the 20th. 1901 was the first!
Except for recruiting better in 18 and 19 is not apples and apples since Herman didn't have 11 win seasons and recruiting classes leading up to his first season. Lincoln was left with the cupboard full. Give Herman next season and THEN we'll see who can coach better (though both are outstanding IMO)This was sort of my original point, back where all this started, which was drawing a parallel between Herman-to-date and Mack Brown's history while at Texas. The only way Mack Brown beat Bobby Stoops was when we were able to completely overwhelm them on talent. That, if talent were equal, Stoops beat Brown more often than not. And, so far at least, Herman vs. Riley looks like a repeat.
Sooner12345, yes, you won decisively. And yes, our offense didn’t look good. But Texas has no offensive identity?Most of Hurts runs were not by design but that’s what mobile qbs do .
It’s not like ou has been hiding that all season.
Your front seven dictate the qb run game .....they failed .
Where in turn our front seven completely shut down your qb run game .....both designed and improvised .
The ou offense this year hinges on Hurts ability to run .
Texas failed from a coaching, scheme and personnel standpoint to even slow it down much less stop it .
I believe Texas is no different , their hums when Sam is major focal point in the run game , ou wasn’t going to let that happen .
Second penalty yardage is not dictated in the box score but neither is the hidden yardage / shorten field either .
It goes both ways , we may have committed a penalty but you were awarded with a 15 yards and a 1st down .Can you really say those all would have absolute catches without their interference, I don’t think so .
They way your wrs dropped balls in that game ,those penalties may have been a blessing for your offense .
I appreciate your welcome , but I call it as I see it about BOTH teams . I also haven’t attacked anyone personal , like an above poster did to me .
When it come to opinions on football,
I dont sugar coat anything .
OU still has major weaknesses that will keep them from winning national
Championship game this season .
They just aren’t very talented in the secondary and Hurts still has trouble with his deep go routes .
Add in a young but very talented online , not to mention thin inside LB depth , ou in my opinion is still not a true title contender .
If they win out sure they deserve to go but it will be like last year , just a step below a Bama, OSU, Clemson .
Again , even though it step below on my opinion it’s HUGE step .
Just like 4 loss teams vs 1 loss teams .
That’s why I had to post , Texas is along ways to bring back .
They may be back from multiple years in a row of losing seasons , but they aren’t back to being perennial conference champions / playoff attendees.
They may have the coach to
Make them good , but can he make them great ??
Year 3 and still no offensive identity
Except for recruiting better in 18 and 19 is not apples and apples since Herman didn't have 11 win seasons and recruiting classes leading up to his first season. Lincoln was left with the cupboard full. Give Herman next season and THEN we'll see who can coach better (though both are outstanding IMO)
All I meant by “supposedly” was that I think someone said we had better talent than OU because we had outrecruited them, but that would have to take into account 4 or five years, and I’m not sure that’s true. Anyway, my main point is that if you added Hurts to their 2019 #6 class, it would probably overbalance our #3 class as far as value added.There is no "supposedly" to it and it's not difficult to research
2018 Team Rankings by 247
Texas #3
ou #9
2019 Team Rankings by 247
Texas #3
ou #6
All I meant by “supposedly” was that I think someone said we had better talent than OU because we had outrecruited them, but that would have to take into account 4 or five years, and I’m not sure that’s true. Anyway, my main point is that if you added Hurts to their 2019 #6 class, it would probably overbalance our #3 class as far as value added.
Soon, we will actually have overall better talent on the field, I think.
This is what you know about most, so feel free to teach me what I need to learn!
So, overall, for the 85 on scholarship right now, you think we have overall higher recruits than they do?That was me. I said other than the transition year, Herman had out recruited ou (he and Riley both started at these schools the same year)
Mack did the same most years -- that was kind of the whole idea behind bringing up on in the recruiting forum
So, overall, for the 85 on scholarship right now, you think we have overall higher recruits than they do?
But my question is about the whole rosters that took the field Saturday. Wouldn’t that go back past Herman?If we dont count 2017, then yes Herman's recruits are higher ranked, as a group, than Riley's recruits
Their 2017 class was ranked much higher than ours (#8 v. #27) so if we added all 3 classes together, I am not sure how it would stack up. But I dont think the 2017 classes were apple-to-apple given the circumstances
But my question is about the whole rosters that took the field Saturday. Wouldn’t that go back past Herman?
There is no "supposedly" to it and it's not difficult to research
2018 Team Rankings by 247
Texas #3
ou #9
2019 Team Rankings by 247
Texas #3
ou #6
This was sort of my original point, back where all this started, which was drawing a parallel between Herman-to-date and Mack Brown's history while at Texas. The only way Mack Brown beat Bobby Stoops was when we were able to completely overwhelm them on talent. That, if talent were equal, Stoops beat Brown more often than not. And, so far at least, Herman vs. Riley looks like a repeat.
There is no reason for you to be an *** in the recruiting thread
... we are all upset about the loss. ....
That's not a good excuse for turning on recruiting thread posters
Other threads can get heated, but there is no good reason for this one to join them
Actually it's even easier than that, you see 247 has a team calculator which compensates for transfers and early entries in the nfl draft. They rank the Texas and Oklahoma as this.
7. Texas 877.91 3 5'star, 43 4'star
8. blowu 869.53 5 5'star, 45 4'star
We have a lot more 3'star players which puts us over them.
The idea we have much more talent is just not true. They are slightly more talented, for now.
Actually, none of what we are talking about should be in the recruiting thread, but we are all upset about the loss. I just think a little perspective is in order. Tom has not been anything like any of our previous coaches. Hell I think McWilliams had the best record against Oklahoma and we fired him. Even Mackovic had a great record against blowu and look how he ended. Herman is building something special here. I've been watching Texas since Akers was the coach, none of them have put things together like Herman has.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC