ProdigalHorn
10,000+ Posts
because I can almost always find a non-greasy part of the bone to handle.
I feel like that's an indictment on the quality of ribs you're getting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because I can almost always find a non-greasy part of the bone to handle.
... I can almost always find a non-greasy part of the bone to handle./QUOTE]
I'll bet you can. jk
I feel like that's an indictment on the quality of ribs you're getting.
Tulsi is actually right on that.
We all know US media sucks, but it is still amazing none of them have ever forced the Open Borders crowd to answer why. Shouldnt this be the first question? -- "How and why would Open Borders would be good for the United States?"
My second question would be "What are we supposed to do with all these uneducated people when automation/robotics takes their low skill jobs? Which, as we are regularly told, is right around the corner. What are they going to do with them then?
There is probably no Democrat alive who will give a truthful answer but they still should be asked. The fact that our media never asks them is embarrassing.
Beto was honest back in 2015
Nancy Pelosi gave their answers: Morality.
They will hold a child up to you and tell you that's the answer. They don't care about the cost; ONLY THE COST OF THE WALL.
What we are supposed to believe is that Beto et al are moral holy people and all others are deplorable. That is the answer.
However, I heard this morning on 590 AM that the Dems are offering $1.5 Billion or thereabouts for a wall as long as it's not solid concrete. Sooooo.... I'm confused...
That does not answer the question. Maybe it's true that it lets Democrats feel good emotionally at what they perceive as moral superiority. But the question is - how does it benefit the country they are sworn to serve?
I hear you. I'm just saying they feel they have answered the question. They are avoiding the question of poverty. I think they roll that into racism; you can't question the people coming over on any level. You can't judge them and their ability to contribute to our nation. And if they are all asylum seekers (coming from sh*thole countries which we are not allowed to use as a description of said countries) as defined by Democrats then cost is moot.
I see that as media failure.
Yes. The country needs a basic primer on the basis of our immigration laws. It is my understanding that we did turn back Europeans at Ellis Island for more than one reason (illness, likelihood of being a ward of the state). This is nothing new. The Democrats seemed to argue that we (Obama) do vet middle eastern emigrees and the "Muslim ban" was unnecessary. But what do we vet them for? And why are we not applying this vetting standard, that is apparently such a fine filter than no terrorist would ever come through, for those coming in from south of the Rio Grande?
Kamala should have done the math. She just seemed giddy to admit she inhaled, maybe too much??
And won't be challenged on her lecturing by any so-called journalists.So Liz Warren has come out lecturing us that “the system is rigged to benefit the rich.” This is the root of her platform
This from a woman who lives in a $5.4M mansion
And claimed “Native American” status to score a Harvard gig paying $350,000 a year to teach one class.
And won't be challenged on her lecturing by any so-called journalists.
Will this have a legal effect later? We'll see.
Maybe it was too soon to right off O'Rourke's chances. Getting positive publicity again.
Big news -- Stacey Abrams has galloped into 5th place
Abrams/O'Rourke 2020
Could we be this lucky?
If so, its proof there is a God
It's always a battle for the moderates at this point. ....
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC