2020 Presidential Election: let the jockeying commence

...Such a slim margin, with the specter of losing control of it next election, is going to make it hard for any Democrat leader, Speech Tearer Nancy or Otherwise, to ram the foolish stuff through, like expanding the SC to 57 seats, or the number of states to 63....

I posted this on the other thread, but Nancy may not have the votes

The next one might be a squid
 
Dude, we are all gonna get money from Ukraine, Russia and China for doing nothing!
Sweet


Dude couldn't even protect his own family from his wife pulling out in front of truck and killing them all, now he's going to protect me?

Plus he's going to him E Emmanuel, who's apparently a fan of Logan's Run, just for 75 year olds. Hmm, how old is Sloe Joe again? Might not want to get any prescriptions from him filled there Slow Joe!
 
If you are in a baseball stadium, but viewing from the upper deck, you might be 'viewing' the game, but you damned sure are NOT in a position to properly observe balls and strikes.

THAT appears to be as proper an analogy as may be applied to Philly 'observers' as they were placed far enough back that even binoculars were of little use. In other words, Elections Officials in that locale deliberately sought to obstruct the view of the counting processes...

I can see the point of view. Surely you can understand the difference between "can't get in" and "can't get close" enough to the listener, right? To use your analogy, one says I'm not being allowed in the ballpark while the other says "I'm in the upper deck when I want to be behind home plate". The former you can't even see the game while in the latter you just have a poor vantage point.

So, can we agree that the poll watchers were in the building (D and R) but they wanted to be closer?

In @Horn6721 's case the remedy is that both sides agreed to a number of poll watchers (60) and a distance (6ft). From what I can see there were other cases on the same issue that Philadelphia appealed after the settlement in the case.
 
I once won a trial by having the other side's "expert" disqualified for something less than this. He missed the deadline to pay his dues and so his license was technically suspended (pro tip: that's something to always check). I waited until he was in the witness box to give him the news. Was very hard not to smile.

As I said above, this stuff is almost funny



This broad would be the never ending topic of all the late night un-funny comics, if she was a Republican who lost her notary licence. Instead this will be all you hear about it.
 
Husker
NO In the court case I listed the suit was about Republican representation NOT being in the room at all
You are trying to conflate 2 different cases to somehow make your point. Won't work
 
....Plus he's going to him E Emmanuel, who's apparently a fan of Logan's Run, just for 75 year olds. Hmm, how old is Sloe Joe again? Might not want to get any prescriptions from him filled there Slow Joe!

Thank goodness he has a doctor in the house

should-have-worn-a-mask.jpg
 
Husker
NO In the court case I listed the suit was about Republican representation NOT being in the room at all
You are trying to conflate 2 different cases to somehow make your point. Won't work

It was all Philadelphia which is counting their votes in a single location, the Convention Center. I've read both cases, I've read the claims. I haven't yet found anything like court minutes but the case you are referencing was settled. It was settled by the Philadelphia voting district agreeing to 60 reps per party and a 6ft distance.

If you really think there were NO reps then why the other lawsuits claiming binoculars and the like? Do you think that would be an acceptable remedy if Philadelphia was really preventing any R poll watchers in the building? After all, they'd have those D's dead to rights in a massive scheme that could void the election...so let's settle!
 
That is a disgusting remark that is reminiscent of 4Chan and has no place on this board.

No, I say it because Slow Joe spend years claiming his family was killed by a drunk driver, for sympathy and political gain. When in reality, his wife caused the crash, and the driver she pulled out in front of was not drinking.

The poor man's family repeatedly asked Slow Joe to stop slandering their dad who did nothing wrong. But there was too much politician mileage to be gained from the lie, so Sloe Joe kept using it. He's truly a piece of ****.
 
No, I say it because Slow Joe spend years claiming his family was killed by a drunk driver, for sympathy and political gain. When in reality, his wife caused the crash, and the driver she pulled out in front of was not drinking.

The poor man's family repeatedly asked Slow Joe to stop slandering their dad who did nothing wrong. But there was too much politician mileage to be gained from the lie, so Sloe Joe kept using it. He's truly a piece of ****.

You mocked the guys dead family. It doesn't get any lower than that. It doesn't matter whatever warped logic you need to use to help you feel better about stooping to such depths.
 
You mocked the guys dead family. It doesn't get any lower than that. It doesn't matter whatever warped logic you need to use to help you feel better about stooping to such depths.

Stoops is a leftist run organization that tries to cover for any Democrat, but even they couldn't paper over this lie:

Did Joe Biden Lie About a Drunken Driver's Killing His Wife?

Again, for political gain, Slow Joe lied about how his family was killed, slandering an innocent man who undoubtedly felt guilty about the accident, even when it wasn't his fault. And he wants to look out for my family? No thanks!
 
Stoops is a leftist run organization that tries to cover for any Democrat, but even they couldn't paper over this lie:

Did Joe Biden Lie About a Drunken Driver's Killing His Wife?

Again, for political gain, Slow Joe lied about how his family was killed, slandering an innocent man who undoubtedly felt guilty about the accident, even when it wasn't his fault. And he wants to look out for my family? No thanks!
I thought Stoops hated puppies? You guys are off your game.
 
No, I say it because Slow Joe spend years claiming his family was killed by a drunk driver, for sympathy and political gain. When in reality, his wife caused the crash, and the driver she pulled out in front of was not drinking.

The poor man's family repeatedly asked Slow Joe to stop slandering their dad who did nothing wrong. But there was too much politician mileage to be gained from the lie, so Sloe Joe kept using it. He's truly a piece of ****.[/QUOTE


Ex-husband says Jill Biden ‘betrayed’ him by cheating on him with Joe Biden; Biden camp denies it
Ex-husband says Jill Biden ‘betrayed’ him by cheating on him with Joe Biden; Biden camp denies it

It seems more likely Joe was to blame for his wife's car accident. Not much character in slow joe.
 
Last edited:
My point is that there are differences between poll watchers of the campaign and general poll watchers that are already there. I think the Trump campaign had to say in court that they number was a number "other than zero" who were there in the room.
What court hearing are you talking about ? Did you hear this on cnn or was it the voices in your head?
 
That giant tax cut pushed us deeper into debt meaning that when the pandemic hit we were in an even worse position. Not that any politician would ever agree to this but I'd love a tax increase where 100% had to go towards paying down our debt. Alas, we as a society love to live on credit. Our government is no different.
Fiscal Year Revenue
FY 2021 $3.86 (estimated)
FY 2020 $3.71 trillion (estimated)
FY 2019 $3.46 trillion (actual)
FY 2018 $3.33 trillion
FY 2017 $3.32 trillion
FY 2016 $3.27 trillion

Yep, tax cuts are killing government revenues.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top