None of it matters, these people knew they were going to vote for impeachment even before they knew what it was about. This is the world we live in today. It was an impeachment vote looking for somewhere to hang its hat.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
None of it matters, these people knew they were going to vote for impeachment even before they knew what it was about. This is the world we live in today. It was an impeachment vote looking for somewhere to hang its hat.
You’re touting Obozo sending that to the very government that even Ms. Hill had doubts about during that time frame? Just sayin’. He fell in line with what the career diplomats wanted I guess.$600 million in aid from 2014 to 2016. Just sayin'.
So Trump was concerned about corruption in Ukraine. Why would he have asked the previous regime to look into it? The fact that Biden was the front runner is odd enough, but he was the front runner when Zelensky first came into power. When should he have asked him to look into it? Oh....never....so improper even though he had been spies on and had fake info bought by Hillary and the DNC.[Gym Jordan]As I have typed about half a dozen times, if there were TRUE concern of corruption, the motivation to investigate would have happened PRIOR to Biden's role as a Dem frontrunner and it would NOT have been mainly focused on a public announcement on US TV!!!!!!!! [/Gym Jordan]
Also, they'd probably not utilize Fraud Guarantee and Rudy G. But that's another investigation.
Probably about the time that Paul Manafort was convicted.So Trump was concerned about corruption in Ukraine. Why would he have asked the previous regime to look into it? The fact that Biden was the front runner is odd enough, but he was the front runner when Zelensky first came into power. When should he have asked him to look into it? Oh....never....so improper even though he had been spies on and had fake info bought by Hillary and the DNC.
I said earlier on this thread that I generally agree with your position (though I don’t think the pressure meets the requirement of quid pro quo) except we are talking about Ukraine and the corrupt Biden family. All rules have exceptions. Yes there was pressure and yes the Bidens/Ukraines should be investigated. Again, what is the problem?Well I'm glad to understand that you don't see anything wrong with demanding investigations of political opponents or their relatives before releasing appropriated funds to a country who desperately needed the funds for defense. I can finally see why you and others find this impeachment scenario so imponderable.
BS. It was bribery. We have this $ to give you but you have to do this superficial act that benefits me in partisan politics to get it. Reading it any other way is being daft.Why is it a big deal for the Dems that the Republicans say Ukraine also meddled in 2016? Holding up aid until all these very diplomats assure Trump that releasing the aid is okay to do is a big deal for what reason besides a non existent quid pro quo. They seem to be saying Republicans and Trump should focus solely on Russian meddling. Who says there is not a focus on that? And are we providing aid to Russia that is being held up until they step in line? No. The new regime in Ukraine needed the aid. Besides continuing the BS fake quid pro quo narrative there is nothing nefarious about it. It hurts the feelings of the diplomats. That’s it.
Show me where the money was ever mentioned. I’ll wait.BS. It was bribery. We have this $ to give you but you have to do this superficial act that benefits me in partisan politics to get it. Reading it any other way is being daft.
I pity the politician that ever says "do me a favor" again.
Relative performance in military aid, economic growth, mean tweets, etc. form no basis for impeachment.
"$600 million in aid from 2014 to 2016.. "..
House asked to bring additional lunch for Nunes, Jordan, and Castor.
Fiona Hill ate theirs.
Bribery does not need to have $ involved. A thing of value would count. But, there was $400,000,000 of taxpayer funds involved.Show me where the money was ever mentioned. I’ll wait.
Your comment said we have this $. I took that to mean money which wasn’t mentioned. Neither was a meeting at the White House. Lots of presumption. Maybe we should call you OUSondland.Bribery does not need to have $ involved. A thing of value would count. But, there was $400,000,000 of taxpayer funds involved.
Nope, you’re missing the point. If this continues based on and it largely is, the statement of “do me a favor”, the precedent is being set, and no one, Democrat or Republican will be spared.If it's a democrat it won't matter.
Nancy may let 20 or so Dems kill the impeachment.Dems will vote to impeach, that was never in doubt. The fun begins when the Senate gets a hold of this. They have the final swing (won't be pretty, or comfortable), then voters can decide.
Can't see how dems come out ahead on this in the end. They needed to move the needle immediately and it didn't happen
Nancy may let 20 or so Dems kill the impeachment.
The value is the announcement by Zelensky that Biden is under criminal investigation. Trump didn’t care if the actually investigated him or not. Why?
Zelensky ran on anti corruption. A public announcement would serve as a test whether Zelensky was serious about corruption.The value is the announcement by Zelensky that Biden is under criminal investigation. Trump didn’t care if the actually investigated him or not. Why?
He does care...and before it's over, he will be (investigated)
Turn about is fair playGraham just started the investigation on the Bidens a few hours ago. I don't know if the Bidens are guilty of anything illegal (definitely unethical) but you can bet Graham will be a hell of a lot more responsible than Schiff has been.
What’s your defense of POTUS’ release of the convicted servicemen?