Ok, here's what I think the actual deal is with Texas and "green" energy:
Our state gov't doesn't go along because they're onboard with Al Gore and any "green" agenda--give me a break guys...
They go along, because promoting and subsidizing wind energy effectively amounts to a significant subsidy to big West Texas ranchers and farmers who are getting some pretty good $$$$ from the wind companies on their land/wind leases--often on some otherwise very marginal $ farms/ranches. You ever drive from Abilene to Sweetwater to Roscoe to Post to Lubbock? Those farmers/ranchers on that dry land are probably banking a lot more $$$$ than they used to...
I don't begrudge them. More power to them (pun fully intended).
Our state gov't doesn't go along because they're onboard with Al Gore and any "green" agenda--give me a break guys...
They go along, because promoting and subsidizing wind energy effectively amounts to a significant subsidy to big West Texas ranchers and farmers who are getting some pretty good $$$$ from the wind companies on their land/wind leases--often on some otherwise very marginal $ farms/ranches. You ever drive from Abilene to Sweetwater to Roscoe to Post to Lubbock? Those farmers/ranchers on that dry land are probably banking a lot more $$$$ than they used to...
I don't begrudge them. More power to them (pun fully intended).
Last edited: