Kentucky seems to do quite well with "young" teams, year in, year out.
True. Their young teams often contain the very top recruits in our country. I mean 2 or 3 of the top 5 or ten. And note that this bunch is balanced. Calaperi cherry picks the best guard, the best big man (men because he often gets more than one).
And its not unusual for Duke and North Carolina to have a one and done guy also. BUT remember, the Kentucky's, Duke's, and North Carolina's of the world have the best basketball tradition in our country, building upon itself uninterrupted over decades and decades. In KU's case since the first half of the 20th century. Coaches, fan base etc. Longer and more consistently than UCLA's which seemed unbeatable for a couple of decades with Wooden. Even UCLA has had trouble keeping its storied program on top with recruits post Wooden. But not UK. And not NC post Smith. It will be very interesting to see what happens to Duke post Coach K.
Anyhow, I guess I am taking too long to say I don't find it very helpful to compare our basketball program with the Kentucky's of the world.
Our team has so many flaws right now. Not just youth. The team is missing some parts that it needs to win consistently in a tough B12. Guard play, a tough smart power forward, etc, just to name a couple. Our young players are not top 5 in the country (Allen is top 15). They were not top ten.
The one and done we have now, Allen, is doing OK, but the poor guard play is inconsistent in how to keep Allen involved. Too much dribbling, not enough passing. Too much standing around, not enough movement, screens, etc.