Joe Fan
10,000+ Posts
This is something that does not get near enough attention. In fact, it barely gets any.
The Inauguration
- Thread starter Clean
- Start date
This is something that does not get near enough attention. In fact, it barely gets any.
Joe Fan
10,000+ Posts
You are such a misogynist pig for trying to mansplain what these ladies were protesting. They are quite capable of articulating for themselves just what it is they want to do
The above two posts are typical, weak arguments repeatedly used by goofy liberals.
"everyone is oversimplifying the women's march"- This crap is stated with a sense of superiority toward those that disagree with him. Only he can understand the complexity. You are too simple. Other examples: "I don't want to get into the weeds"
"Trump would be best not to poke the bear by defunding planned parenthood"- In other words, and disregarding facts, "you will suffer if you disagree with me, the all knowing liberal"
You'd have to disregard the multitude of sexual harassment claims against him, the Billy Bush tape, the comments on the Howard Stern show, the treatment of Carly Fiorina and others to believe that he doesn't have a misogynistic view of women. Ivanka Trump is one of the only arguments against this and in this case you can clearly see that family trumps other views. ."- the liberal can take anecdotal incidents that favor his arguments and extrapolate them to the universe, but the repeated actions of Trump hiring women and supporting his daughter that counter the lib's argument are either ignored or relegated to a "one-off', family related situation. Ignoring facts are a favorite tactic of liberals. For instance, what happened to all of the women that made unfounded sexual harassment claims against Trump at the end of the Presidential campaign? They disappeared as soon as Trump said he was going to sue them. Has a court found Trump guilty of sexual harassment? No, but that doesn't stop the liberal from making the "all or nothing" argument that every thought Trump has about all women involves prejudice and that he will sexually harass all women.
-In this case all facts concerning the specifics of the women's soccer team's complaints are ignored, as are the wholly disingenuous claims concerning a lack of "women's rights" existing somewhere in the U.S., or that women's rights are being denied. Top off that tactic with "your a misogynist because you don't agree with my views", despite the fact that his views are baseless and illegitimate. Buried in the lib's argument is the implication that he is for women's rights and you are not.Nope...no anti-women sentiment in the Trumpsters.
In one post, you've validated the 1.5M people that joined the Womxn's march. Bravo. Nice attempt to absolve your misogynist sentiment with the "I'm all for equality, but..." .
Last edited:
Joe Fan
10,000+ Posts
Update on coming indictments --
"WASHINGTON (ABC7) — A grand jury in the Superior Court of D.C. returned a superseding indictment in the Inauguration Day felony rioting case Thursday, the U.S. Attorney's Office of D.C. reports.
The indictment adds additional charges and provides more details on the events that took place in the District on January 20.
Approximately 212 people face felony charges, which includes one count of inciting or urging a riot, one count of engaging in a riot, one count of conspiracy to riot and five counts of destruction of property, the indictment states.
Additional charges have been added to some of the defendants cases, including destruction of property involving damage to a limousine. ..."
http://wjla.com/news/local/grand-ju...tment-in-inauguration-day-felony-rioting-case
"WASHINGTON (ABC7) — A grand jury in the Superior Court of D.C. returned a superseding indictment in the Inauguration Day felony rioting case Thursday, the U.S. Attorney's Office of D.C. reports.
The indictment adds additional charges and provides more details on the events that took place in the District on January 20.
Approximately 212 people face felony charges, which includes one count of inciting or urging a riot, one count of engaging in a riot, one count of conspiracy to riot and five counts of destruction of property, the indictment states.
Additional charges have been added to some of the defendants cases, including destruction of property involving damage to a limousine. ..."
http://wjla.com/news/local/grand-ju...tment-in-inauguration-day-felony-rioting-case
Last edited:
Joe Fan
10,000+ Posts
A guilty plea for "Florida man" - 6 years possible
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/28/dane-powell-black-bloc-protester-pleads-guilty-to-/
"....Dane Powell, 31, of Tampa was the first to enter a guilty plea on felony charges brought against 212 protesters accused of rioting and vandalizing property during the Jan. 20 melee surrounding President Trump’s swearing-in ceremony.
Scheduled to be sentenced July 7, he faces a possible six years in prison for breaking windows and throwing a “brick, large rock or piece of concrete” at officers after joining a mob of masked black bloc protesters who moved en masse across 16 blocks in about 30 minutes, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Scheduled to be sentenced July 7, he faces a possible six years in prison for breaking windows and throwing a “brick, large rock or piece of concrete” at officers after joining a mob of masked black bloc protesters who moved en masse across 16 blocks in about 30 minutes, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/28/dane-powell-black-bloc-protester-pleads-guilty-to-/
Joe Fan
10,000+ Posts
The first trial of the inauguration arrests is getting ready to begin. This one involves 7 people, one of whom is a amateur 'journalist' who broadcasts part of it on FB. Each of them is charged with 5 felony destruction of property charges and a felony riot-incitement charge that carry up to 10 years in prison each. Plus misdemeanor charges of rioting and conspiracy to riot (180 days each). If convicted, actual sentences can be and likely would be less time.
There were more than 230 arrests total, including other media types, after marchers smashed coffee-shop, restaurant, hotel, vehicle, bus stop, bank windows and lit a limo on fire. 19 of them plead to misdemeanors. But 200 still face charges that carry a maximum of 61 years in prison. One of the more interesting aspects of this is some of the media were let go with no charges (NBC and US News & World Report) while others were charged.
Civil lawsuits are ready to fly as well, if there are acquittals. The ACLU is ready to go. But convictions will probably result in a lot of subsequent plea deals.
It will be an interesting trial as the prosecution theory seems to be conspiracy rather than direct property damage.
There were more than 230 arrests total, including other media types, after marchers smashed coffee-shop, restaurant, hotel, vehicle, bus stop, bank windows and lit a limo on fire. 19 of them plead to misdemeanors. But 200 still face charges that carry a maximum of 61 years in prison. One of the more interesting aspects of this is some of the media were let go with no charges (NBC and US News & World Report) while others were charged.
Civil lawsuits are ready to fly as well, if there are acquittals. The ACLU is ready to go. But convictions will probably result in a lot of subsequent plea deals.
It will be an interesting trial as the prosecution theory seems to be conspiracy rather than direct property damage.
Weekly Prediction Contest
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC
Recent Threads
-
The Media Industry
- Started by texas_ex2000
- Replies: 8K
- West Mall
-
President Biden Accountability Thread
- Started by 2003TexasGrad
- Replies: 4K
- West Mall
Prediction Results Threads
