Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I somehow got on a list on Nextdoor for a call to let our state pols know to vote against vouchers.
I posted that people should read the bill and understand what it would do and not do. They removed me from list.
The people who don't want vouchers support the status quo. I wonder how many are parents with kids in public schools.
What has really killed vouchers is rural lawmakers (almost entirely Republicans) who don't want to disrupt the economic status quo. These members are usually hard-line social conservatives, but they fear the job losses if their school district's funding is disrupted.
The fears look illegitimate to me. There have to be alternatives for a parent to go to. If there is a private school in a small town it will just shift students between schools. Sounds more like the public school unions have more sway over Republicans in rural areas than others.
Ok, but job losses for the community wouldn't be affected. Just for the public schools. That points to them being captured by public unions not the actual economics of their town.
Public schools are easily the largest employer in most towns under 10k population. I'm guesstimating on the population cutoff, so let's not quibble over that.
The point is, a representative who has a number of those small towns within his district needs to be very, very careful before throwing support to a plan that could upset those apple carts. It's a whole lotta voters he's liable to piss off.
If a large swath of their constituents are in the public schools, maybe their interests are intertwined
I get why the reps would be concerned. But it is based on surface level thinking.
First, rural towns don't really have many options outside of the public school. Most would have 0 or maybe 1 other private/church school. So the ability for parents to move their kids out is very minimal. Their situation basically stays the same with or without the voucher program. If the union is able to scare the R rep into voting along their interests that tells me the rep is under average IQ or cowardly.
Second, from a total employment perspective it is also a wash. Say the small town church school gets 60 more kids in due to the voucher program. Where do you think they add teachers from? Most likely they pull teachers from the public school. Private schools tend to want lower teacher to student ratios so they may need more teachers to teach those 60 than the public school would use.
So the rep won't be voting against vouchers because it hurts educating students or because teacher unemployment goes up. It is strictly to vote in line with public union interests. Hypocritical and self defeating.
No criticism, but in reading this thread, I have two major questions:
1) Do y'all realize what a QUALITY private school costs in this state?
2) I question whether or not the quality private schools will accept the vouchers.
FWIW, I served on the school board of a private school in Houston for four years, as well as numerous committees. While I was serving we got our graduates accepted into Yale, Harvard, MIT, Wharton, UVA, UNC, W&L, Vandy, Northwestern, USC, UCLA, Stanford, and of course Texas & aTm.
How about they approve a bill that allows tax payers to deduct the amount of private school tuition from their ISD taxes?
School choice defeated in the Texas House. See what I mean about the power of teacher groups and how politically shrewd they've been during primaries? They have 21 Republicans willing to do their bidding - almost 1/4 of their caucus. That's not true in many states. And of course, most of these members are from rural districts.
And to make matters worse, the MoFo who led the charge is a friggin' Aggie.
I'm with you. Abbott set this up as a priority to pass. The Senate passed the school choice bill. Then the House subversives sabotaged the bill using Republicans. School choice is a conservative, libertarian, Christian priority but it's killed in Texas government time after time because school unions are evil and Republicans sell out for Communists all the time.
It makes me wonder if the teacher groups are more politically effective in Texas or if conservative activists are less effective in Texas than in other states.
It is strange. But despite teacher's unions and public schools being oriented left many conservatives, especially in small towns identify their town identity with the school. It is who runs the football team.
I used to be guilty. No more.That's undoubtedly a factor. Same goes for college. How many right-leaning people give money to and generally advocate for schools like UT while it drills Marxism into students just because those right leaning people identify with it as alumni?
What's a bit strange is that opposition among Republicans is largely coming from the most socially conservative rural areas. Plenty of other states that also have significant rural areas are able to pass school choice with no problem. It makes me wonder if the teacher groups are more politically effective in Texas or if conservative activists are less effective in Texas than in other states.
I think the small town fear is take my kid five minutes to the public school or 45 minutes to the larger but certainly not large town with a private school.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC