Texas rolls into Norman on Sunday

Let's put this in perspective, we have only 2 losses for the year! I think had we said that in November, we would have all been happy with only two losses.

Our post play has been getting exposed over the last 3 to 5 games. We have the tallest post but both are very soft and do not play with any physical presence. My question is what is the coaching staff going to do about it. I would suggest that we abandon the post when we are not getting any offensive from them.

I would like to see us speed the ball up and may play with 5 smaller players that can trap the ball and force turnovers. A line up with Celina, Brooke, Empress, Ariel and Bri. full court 1-2-2 and back in a trapping 2-3 zone. We might give up a few baskets but I can bet we are going to get a few easy ones too.

Our post are not rebounding anyway, so why reward them with playing time.

There were two coaching decisions that I can understand, 1st Coach Aston didn't use her timeouts to stop the run and 2nd she didn't start Celina in the 4th Qtr. OU went on run after we took the momentum going into the 4th Qtr.

Once the momentum swung to OU, we weren't going to get it back! They were playing at home and wanted that game more than us.

I am not saying that Coach Aston cost us the game because I believe it's always on the players but I just didn't understand why she didn't do those two things.

Coach Tina needs to really have a long talk with Imani and Kelsey! Those two are starting to be big disappointments.
Imani and Kelsey aren't very comfortable when they're posting up on the block. Kelsey isn't a back to the basket player, so it's on Coach Aston to recognize that and play Kelsey to her strengths. When Kelsey is in the game she should always be at the free throw line area facing the basket shooting those 10 to12 foot jump shots that she's comfortable with. Putting Kelsey there would also help space the floor.
 
Last edited:
S.O.S. .......Baylor will win title again.....Watch Kim when Baylor comes to Norman. She won't stand there with her arms folded if the refs cheat.......My kind of coach...Takes up for her players when they are getting screwed over.
That's why Mulkey belongs at Tennessee.
 
Imani and Kelsey got worked over and generated no interior offense. Thsts where the game was loss.
Couldn't agree more. Both bigs with horrible foot movement on defense. It's a big weakness that other teams are now exploiting. We better learn how to play a great zone defense in the future, because everyone's found our weaknesses in the paint.
 
Couldn't agree more. Both bigs with horrible foot movement on defense. It's a big weakness that other teams are now exploiting. We better learn how to play a great zone defense in the future, because everyone's found our weaknesses in the paint.
In the future we won't have any BIGS...All our recruits are no bigger than 6'3" or 6'4"....No big ones like Boyette. Puzzling since Boyette's shot blocking has been so huge for us defensively, etc.
 
We better learn how to play a great zone defense in the future, because everyone's found our weaknesses in the paint.
Exactly my point! With our quickness on the perimeter we should be able to play a matchup zone and be able to guard the long ball pretty effectively. The current one-dimensional defensive strategy looks far too familiar. Ughhh....
 
Exactly my point! With our quickness on the perimeter we should be able to play a matchup zone and be able to guard the long ball pretty effectively. The current one-dimensional defensive strategy looks far too familiar. Ughhh....
They played some zone in the 4th quarter.
 
Last edited:
As slow as OU guards are.They started traping the Texas guards.Are we really getting the best out of the talented player's we have.Are we placing the player's in a situation to be successful.
 
They played some zone in the 4th quarter.
As I said, "we need to learn how to play GREAT zone defense in the future, because everyone's found our weakness in the paint."

We played some zone in the 4th quarter....but it wasn't even good...much less great.
 
In the future we won't have any BIGS...All our recruits are no bigger than 6'3" or 6'4"....No big ones like Boyette. Puzzling since Boyette's shot blocking has been so huge for us defensively, etc.
Oklahoma's Pierre-Louis is 6'4"....scored 17 against our bigs.
Kaylon Williams is 6'3"....scored 13 against our bigs.
 
Our players aren't developing. We are the equivalent of Texas A&M's football team.. The best talent but no development . It's time to wake up people.
 
Our players aren't developing. We are the equivalent of Texas A&M's football team.. The best talent but no development . It's time to wake up people.
Well that's just absurd. You're talking about kids who went like 13-19 as freshman to a team as seniors who are now 23-2. Im no wiz, but I would call a - 17 in the loss column a development. Could just be me though
 
Our players aren't developing. We are the equivalent of Texas A&M's football team.. The best talent but no development . It's time to wake up people.

Two losses, Top Ten ranking and still looking at a #2 seed in the Big Dance. I think I'll keep snoozing.
 
It's a reason why our attendance is so low and we are a top 10 team in the nation..
you're right because historically women's basketball has high attendance turn outs right?

And I'm sure that being in one of the most active and diverse cites in the world with a million things to do on a given day have nothing to do with it
 
In the future we won't have any BIGS...All our recruits are no bigger than 6'3" or 6'4"....

Ok that may not be exceptionally tall for a post player at this level, but it's hardly "not a big" either. Heck, Stacey Stephens might be the best post player we've had at Texas since I started following the team anyway (~15 years) and she was 6'1". This is sort of like saying the mid-2000s Detroit Pistons didn't have any bigs since Ben Wallace was only 6'9".
 
Re: Zone defense.

Again, the one-dimensional defensive philosophy is looking painfully familiar. If you're REALLY a defensive-minded team, then you know how to play different ones that suit the match-ups.
 
Re: Zone defense.

Again, the one-dimensional defensive philosophy is looking painfully familiar. If you're REALLY a defensive-minded team, then you know how to play different ones that suit the match-ups.
This I agree with, and I would like to see us press more. Zone wouldn't have helped us at OU imo because they're really good at finding gaps and open shooters.
 
This I agree with, and I would like to see us press more. Zone wouldn't have helped us at OU imo because they're really good at finding gaps and open shooters.
True, I'd like to see us at least switch up throughout the game though andmake the opponent have to make live adjustments. Our depth may not be highly skilled to the end of our bench, but the athleticism is definitely there to wreak havoc with full-court pressure and it energizes the team when we're flat.
 
I find myself shaking my head listening to Coach Aston as to why the team is struggling with the loss to Oklahoma and struggle against Kansas State. She cites two reasons: 1) this is the second go 'round in the Big 12 and everyone knows everyone, which I totally agree, and 2) the players are fatigued, which I don't buy.



If that's the case, Baylor should be struggling too. Their schedule is similar, second go 'round, and their players should be just as fatigued.

As the reporters suggest, the struggles are related to Imani. Perhaps that's just a coach covering for one of her players. But the journalists are absolutely correct the team is struggling because Imani is struggling both offensively and defensively.

Imani was such a difference maker early in the season. And now smaller, but stronger (and less talented) post opponents are out playing and out muscling her on both ends the floor. It's all inter-related. If Imani can demand double teams, that opens up opportunities on the perimeter. If Imani can be the defensive force in the paint, Texas transition game improves.
 
I find myself shaking my head listening to Coach Aston as to why the team is struggling with the loss to Oklahoma and struggle against Kansas State. She cites two reasons: 1) this is the second go 'round in the Big 12 and everyone knows everyone, which I totally agree, and 2) the players are fatigued, which I don't buy.



If that's the case, Baylor should be struggling too. Their schedule is similar, second go 'round, and their players should be just as fatigued.

As the reporters suggest, the struggles are related to Imani. Perhaps that's just a coach covering for one of her players. But the journalists are absolutely correct the team is struggling because Imani is struggling both offensively and defensively.

Imani was such a difference maker early in the season. And now smaller, but stronger (and less talented) post opponents are out playing and out muscling her on both ends the floor. It's all inter-related. If Imani can demand double teams, that opens up opportunities on the perimeter. If Imani can be the defensive force in the paint, Texas transition game improves.

Imani not playing well is one reason Texas has struggled. The other reason is because of the lack of consistent perimeter jump shooting other than Brooke.
 
Agree. That's why Atkins needs to be more consistent in her quality of playing time and stay out of foul trouble. When she is "on", she is the best shooter on the team. Teams will need to take account for her on the court, which will open things up for Brooke. Atkins got a late start due to rehabbing her injury but hopefully she will start peaking at the end of the season.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top