Never sell a gun to Barry Switzer. But if you did, why would you be liable? He's never shown a tendency for violence, at least not that I am aware. And if Barry wants a gun to protect himself from Longhorns such as myself, he has a constitutional right to get one.
No 4th floor, you need to not only sell him the gun, but you need to continuously monitor him for the remainder of his life to make sure he doesn't do something illegal with the weapon. Damn you are dumb.
That was a bit of a joke and a h/t to my avatar. Pretend that Switzer's arrest for packing the firearm on the airplane resulted in him never being able to purchase a handgun through regular channels.
Under my plan if I sell a gun to some one on 1/1/18 and he's good and clean but he commits some violation that translates to him not being eligible to purchase a gun on 1/15/18 then I'm free and clear. I'd just hang on to what I had that indicated that he was good and clean and all is well. It's not the seller's responsibility to follow up on what may or may not happen in the future. Unless you want to make it an unworkable plan.
Hell Bubba, let's do the same thing with autos, knives, baseball bats, matches, and pressure cookers. Let the mind reading begin.
And now the red states are dealing with a decade of failed economic theory. Look no further than Kansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi, etc. Arkansas still has a little bit of the old Clinton fumes left and that helped stave off a complete red state takeover there but it was happening. This activation of the younger generation will be interesting to watch.
I'm not, because most of those youths are too inexperienced in life to have the first clue what's good for them wrt government's presence and role in their lives.
And yet Texas has no income tax. You, once again, only address the revenue side of the equation, and, like most libs that cannot control spending, ignore the expenses incurred.
Comparing Texas to Oklahoma is not reasonable. I think most of you would concur. San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Ft. Worth are all large population centers and shuffles the deck as far as taxation goes. Property taxes are significantly higher in Texas.
Dude was saying that Texas was financially stronger due to not having a state income tax. I pointed out that A. big cities B. property tax base significantly higher. I mean, OKC would rank behind Dallas, Ft. Worth, Houston and maybe San Antonio and Tulsa would probably be smaller than Austin and Amarillo. That's all my guessing.
You can't look at taxes in a vacuum. Politicians will always spend what is taxed, and borrow to spend more. There is no short term downside for them to do so. They can buy votes by giving away other people's money.
Maybe you and the libs could reduce your Oklahoma tax revenues more by hammering the oil companies with more regulations. Attacking your source of revenue seems like such a great idea.
I'll help you out, just because your guessing is wrong.
You missed Ft. Worth. Why be a douche?
I said I was guessing. You, basically, validated my numbers. Thanks.
