Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But the money is still too big to pay out during covid.
I have a little higher exception from our basketball program that what we have received in the last 6 years, We are paying millions for a coach that runs a clean program? That is all we are getting. We have a NIT trophy, we are no. 69!, and a conference tourney trophy that means nothing. Barnes final 4 team lost the first game of conference tourney because it means nothing unless you are trying to just get into the dance. This year was even worse because of the covid forfeit that benefited us.So, I guess I'd like to know your delineation between conference and national championships. Every coach we've had going back to 1959 (even Kaiser Bob) won a conference championship. And honestly, I think that's kind of our "peak" when it comes to basketball success. Expecting to compete for national titles is a whole other level and requires more than just a coaching change. I'd love to be there, but as long as we're not, I don't think it requires radical thinking.
Second, the lottery pick stuff: almost all lottery picks don't come from Final 4 teams. You'll find the "outlier" years where maybe like 5 of them were, but do you really believe that one year of Bamba, one year of Allen, and one year of Hayes "make" a college program? They're drafted on size and athleticism, much like Greg Brown is about to be. They're also not Kevin Durant, who got us to the round of 32. They can't play guard and do the things that win banners.
Shaka's coaching was good enough to put us in position to succeed this year. The whole team had some brain farts (but mostly Ramey in the close games, honestly).
Finally, I do believe Shaka runs a clean program. Barnes didn't. We now know enough about 13 former Barnes players (two of whom were recruited by Barnes but started under Smart) to make insiders blush. Does it go on everywhere? Probably. But I think Shaka has done a good job in that regard and gives him a leg up on other candidates we might look at right now.
Why? The football coach only needs to win, he does not need an entertaining product. In basketball, you have to win and entertain (we want Phi Slamma Jamma, not a defensive mastermind) plus you have to win in the NCAA tournament, the only time of year when +/- 85% of Texas fans watch basketball.
I have a little higher exception from our basketball program that what we have received in the last 6 years, We are paying millions for a coach that runs a clean program? That is all we are getting. We have a NIT trophy, we are no. 69!, and a conference tourney trophy that means nothing. Barnes final 4 team lost the first game of conference tourney because it means nothing unless you are trying to just get into the dance. This year was even worse because of the covid forfeit that benefited us.
You realize that 6 other basketball programs in the state finish the big dance ahead of us. That makes us no. 7 in the state of Texas.
Doesn't the coach have some responsibility for repeated brain farts by a player that cost us games? Especially since there is a season long pattern of the same mistakes. Isn't the coach responsible to have a team ready to play with a week to prepare? What do they do in practice, play a game of "HORSE"? I expect more than to finish in the bottom half of the big 12 MOST of the time. I want to win an NCAA tourney game more than once in a decade I do not think we exceed 1 if Smart is here 10 tears.. Did Greg Brown improve during the season? I did not see it, I thought his performance deteriorated to the point he did not get playing time.
The TO's did not just surface in the ACU game, that, and too many fouls have plagued this team since the first game. 20 TO's in a game is NOT unusual for this team. Did you see anything different from the start of the ACU until the end, I did not. What adjustments were made?
This team was very talented, and undisciplined. That is on the coach
I am sorry, for millions of dollars a year, I expect more that being the 7th best program in the state of Texas but just run a clean program. How can you be sure of that? It certainly wasn't clear that Barnes wasn't if what you say is true. It must not have been a big issue or we would be on probation. We are not getting what we are paying for. A nice guy, yes. Players love him. Good coach NO.
I suspect that fans could embrace a Princeton-esque slowdown if it meant going 30-2 and at least getting to the Final Four on a regular basis. Hell, that sort of thing allowed Valvano's NC State team to shut down Phi Slamma Jamma.
The problem is recruiting for a system like that because too many of the kids want to be the focus and have the huge numbers, completely overlooking that an ability to showcase SMARTS for the game could actually help a career going forward to the next level...
There you go. Reason enough to keep Shaka. The first clean basketball coach we've had in eons. (I really liked Tournament Tom, but he did have his share of controversy).So, I guess I'd like to know your delineation between conference and national championships. Every coach we've had going back to 1959 (even Kaiser Bob) won a conference championship. And honestly, I think that's kind of our "peak" when it comes to basketball success. Expecting to compete for national titles is a whole other level and requires more than just a coaching change. I'd love to be there, but as long as we're not, I don't think it requires radical thinking.
Second, the lottery pick stuff: almost all lottery picks don't come from Final 4 teams. You'll find the "outlier" years where maybe like 5 of them were, but do you really believe that one year of Bamba, one year of Allen, and one year of Hayes "make" a college program? They're drafted on size and athleticism, much like Greg Brown is about to be. They're also not Kevin Durant, who got us to the round of 32. They can't play guard and do the things that win banners.
Shaka's coaching was good enough to put us in position to succeed this year. The whole team had some brain farts (but mostly Ramey in the close games, honestly).
Finally, I do believe Shaka runs a clean program. Barnes didn't. We now know enough about 13 former Barnes players (two of whom were recruited by Barnes but started under Smart) to make insiders blush. Does it go on everywhere? Probably. But I think Shaka has done a good job in that regard and gives him a leg up on other candidates we might look at right now.
Facts are tough to argue. This is great for argument, bad for UT basketball. Take skin color of shaka out of the equation and he would already be gone.You really think a coach who takes blue chips annually to a barely .500 record and below .500 overall in conference is a unicorn?
Well Chop it does seems like Shaka has quite a bit of support. I really hope he is back as I find it impossible to believe we would fire a coach after this great season. Basically it would be the equivalent of firing a football coach who made a tier 1 bowl game, but got blown out in bowl. Does not make sense.
Take skin color of shaka out of the equation and he would already be gone.
Ahhh, you mean like John Makovic did??? Uh, yeah. Care to rehash that one. I hope not, but I think the basketball team is going to be really bad next year. Do they even have any players left? Hamm just went into the portal. Next season could possibly worse than 2016-17. And believe it or not, that team actually had two five star recruits, Jones and Allen. That team challenged for one of the worst Longhorn teams ever, challenging the Kaiser Bob teams. People were actually calling for his job back then. Heck, maybe they can find some hotshot coach to bring in who will bring half his team with him like the softball coach did. Just sayin.Well Chop it does seems like Shaka has quite a bit of support. I really hope he is back as I find it impossible to believe we would fire a coach after this great season. Basically it would be the equivalent of firing a football coach who made a tier 1 bowl game, but got blown out in bowl. Does not make sense.
Yes, it was s liberal use of the TO no., just as you calling the conference tourney the championship, especially this year. The chart at the bottom reflects his conference standings. However, the TO no. was greater than 14 @ game 13 times and it did not improve as the season progressed, it deteriorated. That was why I wondered what they did in practice or in the film room instead of pointing out what sloppy dribbling/ passing was leading to the TOs. I will say one of the problems was the lack of a true point guard. That is not a knock on Coleman but a failure of the coaching to make it a primary part of his game to distribute the ball to get people open for a high percentage shot. I saw an awful lot of dribbling and not a lot of passing. However, my knowledge of the game is not close to yours. I admit that.20 turnovers is something that only happened twice to the team this season before ACU, so I'd say it is unusual
At the expense of all other aspects of the game where they were sub par?Does it really look like they play HORSE in practice? They'd be shooting better if they were.
That's not the issue, return on capital is. We are not getting what we are paying for.Finally, I'll say that we have to pay whoever is the HC at the University of Texas a lot
Would you want to stick around for lots of playing time on a team that looks like it will struggle to achieve more than 10 wins next year?Wonder if Shaka's been portal'ed and he told his guys and now they are jumping. With the graduations and junior exits Hamm and Williams are surprising with the playing time available next year.
Uh oh...Crap, didn’t know about Williams!
So now Williams and Hamm have portaled, 2 I thought would for sure be back. Will Shaka even be able to field a team next season?
That's not the issue, return on capital is. We are not getting what we are paying for.
So Shaka has 2 scholarship players returning? What a hole he's put the program in.
so you are saying we MUST pay a coach at the top of Big 12 scale and accept mid to bottom results. Is that written somewhere?But what I'm saying is that we're going to be paying whoever's here anyhow.
Although I dont like what shaka has accomplished, dont under estimate that ACU club. They played solid defense and just outplayed and out coached UT. My hats off to them. They also took Texas Tech to the wire so they do play sound fundamental basketball which is a foreign concept to shaka.We lost to a team some Houston High Schools would beat. Enough said. Fire the guy.
so you are saying we MUST pay a coach at the top of Big 12 scale and accept mid to bottom results. Is that written somewhere?
I guess it is possible to get somebody worse, but I am willing to take a chance based on what I have seen for 6 years.
so might as well make the change now.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC