Here's the thing. I don't disagree again. However, the Republicans had the Senate and Congress for 2 years and didn't do anything on spending. So they don't want to cut spending either. If they actually wanted to they could have cut spending in 2017.
You're right. The same thing happened during most of the Bush Administration. I think that most Republicans would cut spending in an ideal world, but the leadership knows that if they make spending cuts a priority, not only do they not attract Democratic votes, they lose marginal votes in their own ranks. And of course, if they force big cuts, Democrats will start filibustering appropriations bills in the Senate. Either way, concessions have to be made, and the first concession is always on entitlement spending, because from a political standpoint, it's the hardest area to cut - much harder than even the Pentagon.
I personally would give up a tax cut if the budget could be balanced without tax increases.
Most of us would even accept a modest tax increase if we actually believed spending would be cut enough to balance the budget. But we know that wouldn't happen. If we raised taxes a little, appropriators would start drooling at the extra cash.
Trump is no good on this issue. The Republican Party is no good on this issue. Until normal people wake up, we will continue to be stolen from by deficit spending.
Yep. In fact, when Trump pledged to oppose entitlement reform, he basically ended any chance at fiscal responsibility for the next several years.