Post-Trump GOP

This country is broken, there is no fixing it, we need to separate or have a blood letting with a civil war. The left has gone completely Socialist/Communist and owns the Media and social networks. Nothing short of war is going to slow them down.
 
SC
I wish I could say I see another way for our country to stop the destruction but having the media fueling guarantees it.
Honestly it is disappointing that nit one dem on WM has spoken about any of the destructive policies
Not even to defend them
It is as if they are all too scared to admit they made a mistake
 
Sheldon, this is where I think secession and/or nullification could be a way to lubricate the differences in our country. Nullification gives states a trap door to escape federal law they really really don't like. It hurts rule of law some, but it is a way to teach us all how to be humble about differences and merciful about punishment for those we disagree with. A healthy bit of nullification would inherently decrease the power of the government and could teach how to be graceful about law enforcement. If a law is ignored enough it could eventually go away too.

Secession is the next option. In its place I would hope there would still be free trade and free movement agreements across the Continent. Maybe there could be 2 or 3 regional federations, all with agreements with one another. The Left my never agree to that because of Climate Change ideology. It is a global movement with global aspirations. They aren't looking for less control. The other big obstacle will be the Deep State. They will want to keep the continent under the Federal Reserve banking system and they will want to continue to draw resources and people for the military from the whole continent. They also have global ambitions so giving up a part of the country will be unthinkable to them.
 
horninchicago said:
I recall him saying we need reform and merit based immigration. I saw how it was all characterized as racist and xenophobic, but I think that was just BS put forth by the media and swallowed up by people because they believe that stuff.

He was critical of Dems and RINos in his tweets. So what? They deserve it.
Click to expand...
A. Hypocritical: His wife and her family are citizens based upon immigration that he supposedly disapproved of.
B. Somewhere between unsettling and racist: "why can't we get more people from countries like Norway instead of from ******** countries?"

Maybe he should have someone write him some talking points and follow them.
 
OUBubba said:
A. Hypocritical: His wife and her family are citizens based upon immigration that he supposedly disapproved of.
B. Somewhere between unsettling and racist: "why can't we get more people from countries like Norway instead of from ******** countries?"

Maybe he should have someone write him some talking points and follow them.
Click to expand...
A. It’s not hypocrisy to take advantage of the current political system that you didn’t have a say and also want an improved version for the future.
B. What is wrong to want immigrants from countries that share similar culture as the US? It assures faster assimilation. Why is this hard to understand?
 
mchammer said:
A. It’s not hypocrisy to take advantage of the current political system that you didn’t have a say and also want an improved version for the future.
B. What is wrong to want immigrants from countries that share similar culture as the US? It assures faster assimilation. Why is this hard to understand?
Click to expand...
A. It is hypocrisy.
B. I'll put you down for unsettling.
 
OUBubba said:
A. It is hypocrisy.
B. I'll put you down for unsettling.
Click to expand...
No, it’s not hypocrisy to marry someone who entered the country based on decisions made decades ago by other people and then want to change the system. According to your logic, anyone impacted by the current immigration policy, such as using a lawn care company that uses illegal labor, can’t have a say on immigration policy? What type of sooner logic is this?
 
mchammer said:
No, it’s not hypocrisy to marry someone who entered the country based on decisions made decades ago by other people and then want to change the system. According to your logic, anyone impacted by the current immigration policy, such as using a lawn care company that uses illegal labor, can’t have a say on immigration policy? What type of sooner logic is this?
Click to expand...
I thought sooner logic was an oxymoron??
 
I know it is early but can I get a running objection to everything that Biden/Harris say or do?

Thanks.


In the future just assume i am against them.
 
Both parties are in their own little civil wars. To build a party broad enough to win elections, you have to have lots of different viewpoints and priorities represented. Some of those viewpoints and priorities conflict.
 
huisache said:
I know it is early but can I get a running objection to everything that Biden/Harris say or do?

Thanks.


In the future just assume i am against them.
Click to expand...

The guy who calls every single president silly names is trying to sound like the adult in the room?
 
Bubba I tend to agree on that ridiculous statue but the goings on at those type conventions borders on absurd anyway. And I admit I smiled and thought well thank goodness it wasn’t made in China.
 
Horn6721 said:
Pecos Bill
Since Bubba won't answer
Do you agree with Biden's policies on illegals and the border?
Click to expand...

On the Post Trump GOP there may not be much interest in Biden's policies to this date.

Perhaps you should start a new post on the subject to gauge interest.

But to answer your question, I have little interest in arguing ideological subjects.
 
PecosBill said:
On the Post Trump GOP there may not be much interest in Biden's policies to this date.

Perhaps you should start a new post on the subject to gauge interest.

But to answer your question, I have little interest in arguing ideological subjects.
Click to expand...
How do you feel about conversations concerning reality?
 
Last edited:
Conversations are welcome but when they are prefaced by posts that indicate the choice is to argue or be attacked for not arguing. In reality not a conversation at all which is two sided but when only one side is acceptable just a presentation the ideological position of a poster.

Example: Honestly it is disappointing that nit one dem on WM has spoken about any of the destructive policies
Not even to defend them
It is as if they are all too scared to admit they made a mistake

Example 2- Notice Bubba only makes anti Trump posts, Since Bubba won't answer...
 
PecosBill said:
Conversations are welcome but when they are prefaced by posts that indicate the choice is to argue or be attacked for not arguing. In reality not a conversation at all which is two sided but when only one side is acceptable just a presentation the ideological position of a poster.

Example: Honestly it is disappointing that nit one dem on WM has spoken about any of the destructive policies
Not even to defend them
It is as if they are all too scared to admit they made a mistake

Example 2- Notice Bubba only makes anti Trump posts, Since Bubba won't answer...
Click to expand...
Horn6721 said:
Do you agree with Biden's policies on illegals and the border?
Click to expand...
Let's converse.
Do you agree with Biden's policies on illegals and the border?
 
PecosBill said:
Conversations are welcome but when they are prefaced by posts that indicate the choice is to argue or be attacked for not arguing. In reality not a conversation at all which is two sided but when only one side is acceptable just a presentation the ideological position of a poster.

Example: Honestly it is disappointing that nit one dem on WM has spoken about any of the destructive policies
Not even to defend them
It is as if they are all too scared to admit they made a mistake

Example 2- Notice Bubba only makes anti Trump posts, Since Bubba won't answer...
Click to expand...
A. Maybe I had you on ignore. Wait...seriously, I do have two fools on ignore. Maybe that is why there’s some perception that I’m not responding.

B. Trump has to be not polling at over 50% of the GOP until you can discuss “post Trump GOP”. It’s more of the same delusional draining (but really filling) the swamp.

C. When have you posed me any questions?

D. I figure he’s unfucking things. I’m happy to discuss policy. I’ve already agreed with Garmel and ii’s twice.

E. Let’s see his first budget and actual policies.

F. Funny how the “I didn’t see his tweet” crowd won’t confirm people over mean tweets. Talk about irony.
 
Last edited:
horninchicago said:
Not sure I'm a fan of the alphabetical lists to make a point.

A. Not

B. A

C. Fan
Click to expand...
A. I like to use them to organize my thoughts and to keep myself from rambling points on top of one another.

2. I don’t do it for you.

III. If that’s your strongest critique of me, I won. :)
 
OUBubba said:
Let’s see his first budget and actual policies
Click to expand...
You voted for a guy with dementia and didn't know his policies? He's screwing up the border again. Let's talk about that policy.

By the way, Biden was in Houston a couple days ago. He was with "Shirley" Jackson Lee, became lost during his speech and said "what am I doing here?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top