Post Left Wing looniness here

[Mr. Deez]

@Garmel you have no need to feel guilt. I'm sure you've paid off many strippers' student loans.

 

[Garmel]

@Garmel you have no need to feel guilt. I'm sure you've paid off many strippers' student loans.

I gotta plead the 5th on that one, counselor.

 

[mb227]

I gotta plead the 5th on that one, counselor.

bourbon, scotch...something else?

 

[Mr. Deez]

Just more reason why people doubt "experts" more than they used to.

 

[mchammer]

California DA Admits 70% Of Suspects Released On $0 Bail Committed New Crimes | ZeroHedge

 

[mb227]

California DA Admits 70% Of Suspects Released On $0 Bail Committed New Crimes | ZeroHedge

In other news, water is determined to have properties consistent with being wet. Also, a bear was observed to crap in the woods. And, coming up after the break...the Pope may, in fact, actually BE Catholic.

 

[Sangre Naranjada]

the Pope may, in fact, actually BE Catholic

I was right with you until you dropped this bombshell.

 

[guy4321]

California DA Admits 70% Of Suspects Released On $0 Bail Committed New Crimes | ZeroHedge

In related news, a California DA asks liberals to redefine the word 'crime' like they have 'recession' and 'woman', which is still a work in progress apparently.

 

[bystander]

More people will borrow than ever before. You can't have forgiven what you haven't borrowed.

 

[bystander]

In related news, a California DA asks liberals to redefine the word 'crime' like they have 'recession' and 'woman', which is still a work in progress apparently.

"Just behavior"

For instance, "The mob engaged in just behavior when they looted the store."

Or, "The mob has been accused of just behavior."

 

[Horn6721]

By

Sounds almost like "those people did something"
Demx writers are funnier than the early SNL writers.

 

[mb227]

"Just behavior"

For instance, "The mob engaged in just behavior when they looted the store."

Or, "The mob has been accused of just behavior."

'ticker on television set- Group seeks Justice'
Person interviewed..."so, yeah...we went in there after everything went down and...it was just us..."

 

[bystander]

By

Sounds almost like "those people did something"
Demx writers are funnier than the early SNL writers.

I just realized the word mob is out of favor.

So instead of mob we will call them, "The aggrieved."

 

[Mr. Deez]

So Ben Shapiro showed up to a podcast conference, and his presence made people "unsafe" and "caused harm."

 

[Mr. Deez]

More about Shapiro. Scary.

 

[Horn6721]

It is easy to think this is serious

 

[bystander]

These are not the kind of people you want in charge of anything. Their "quick trigger emotions" is exactly the symptom for Liberals. They are just over-wrought. They can't handle reality or anything that doesn't comfort them.

I've been saying it a long time; they are mentally ill.

 

[horninchicago]

As long as they aren't bullies.

 

[bystander]

As long as they aren't bullies.

Some guy on the radio or giving a speech that is against your politics is not bullying people per se. Being the governor of a state, turning around, getting in the face of young people about their masks, then ridiculing them as he turns around is not the same thing as what the people above were warning about.

Sorry, that's how I see it.

 

[Mr. Deez]

What's so goofy about this sort of thing is that there is no left wing commentator or politician that would trigger this kind of reaction from any conservative audience or constituency. Louis Farrakhan could show up at something, and he might get yelled at, but you'd never hear conservatives saying his mere presence "harmed" them.

Hell, I was at a Christian Coalition conference in 1996 in DC, and Al Franken showed up. People laughed at him and busted his balls a little, but nobody freaked out or said he was unwelcome or "harming" anybody.

 

[bystander]

As long as they aren't bullies.

Hey, if I broad-brushed then I don't want to keep arguing. I'm not going to insist that everything I say reconciles completely with everything I say. I like to think I have a world view that takes everything into consideration and that you can see where I am coming from in any given situation. I don't want to be one of those people who reacts to a situation and responds without an acknowledgement to an overall philosophy or merely what I said yesterday. I also like to think I can change my conclusions or even my philosophy if the facts warrant that I do.

Hook 'em and let's move on.

 

[mb227]

So Ben Shapiro showed up to a podcast conference, and his presence made people "unsafe" and "caused harm."

Some people are softer than the Charmin Ultra Soft their mother wiped their *** with...

 

[mb227]

Some guy on the radio or giving a speech that is against your politics is not bullying people per se. Being the governor of a state, turning around, getting in the face of young people about their masks, then ridiculing them as he turns around is not the same thing as what the people above were warning about.

Sorry, that's how I see it.

Once again, for the people in the back...there was NO bullying. The kids actually seemed happy to be given permission to ditch the face diaper. None of those kids showed indicia of feeling as though they were bullied.

 

[bystander]

Once again, for the people in the back...there was NO bullying. The kids actually seemed happy to be given permission to ditch the face diaper. None of those kids showed indicia of feeling as though they were bullied.

I watched the video. Not sitting in the back. If he acted that way to me I would have responded aggressively. He was an *******. That's my opinion.

I heard some Conservative talk show hosts on WOAI in San Antonio say that it made them angry when they saw people wearing masks.

Why does it matter? F them.

 

[mchammer]

I heard some Conservative talk show hosts on WOAI in San Antonio say that it made them angry when they saw people wearing masks.

Why does it matter? F them.

People who wear masks are generally criminals. It makes sense. Also I think they are mad at Fauci and others who abuse their powers.

 

[guy4321]

What's so goofy about this sort of thing is that there is no left wing commentator or politician that would trigger this kind of reaction from any conservative audience or constituency. Louis Farrakhan could show up at something, and he might get yelled at, but you'd never hear conservatives saying his mere presence "harmed" them.

Hell, I was at a Christian Coalition conference in 1996 in DC, and Al Franken showed up. People laughed at him and busted his balls a little, but nobody freaked out or said he was unwelcome or "harming" anybody.

Oh, I think there might be a liberal whose mere presence might cause you harm.

Exhibit A

 

[Sangre Naranjada]

What's so goofy about this sort of thing is that there is no left wing commentator or politician that would trigger this kind of reaction from any conservative audience or constituency. Louis Farrakhan could show up at something, and he might get yelled at, but you'd never hear conservatives saying his mere presence "harmed" them.

That's because those of us not in the pussified left still know how to live and let live, and we also know how to have fun while busting the tiny, itty-bitty balls of those who are in the p-fied left.

 

[Sangre Naranjada]

Oh, I think there might be a liberal whose mere presence might cause you harm.

Not harm.

Nausea, yes.

 

[Mr. Deez]

That's because those of us not in the pussified left still know how to live and let live, and we also know how to have fun while busting the tiny, itty-bitty balls of those who are in the p-fied left.

And what's sad is that liberals didn't used to be like this. In fact, when Franken showed up, he generally laughed along with the ridicule. I know his public persona was a bit assholic to conservatives, but in person, he was cool even when surrounded by people he obviously had profound disagreement with. He joked around and was respectful - kinda like how you'd picture hanging out with Switzer to be.

 

[mchammer]