Post Left Wing looniness here

Since Wellesley 's policy already admitted people who" live and consistently identify as women" Isn't that what transgender is?
How is this new resolution different?
 
Horn6721 said:
Since Wellesley 's policy already admitted people who" live and consistently identify as women" Isn't that what transgender is?
How is this new resolution different?
Click to expand...

Unless I'm misunderstanding, this new policy will admit women who identify as men.

Think about the consequences of this. The only people at that school that you'll know for sure to be women are those who look the most like men. How ****** up do we have to get?
 
Mr. Deez said:
What apparently set up the freakout at Stanford Law School. This would have been massively frowned upon when I was in law school - not just because it's rude but because someone doing this kind of thing would look massively weak - both mentally and emotionally.

And I fear for the future of the legal profession. No client should ever trust a lawyer who's this weak. If you can't handle a speaker who disagrees with you, how will you handle things in the courtroom if they don't go as you expect? You have to keep your composure whether you're doing great or losing your ***. If you can't, then you shouldn't be in the profession.

What should happen? Not sure I'd expel the students. People in their early 20s do stupid things, and that generally shouldn't define their careers and lives. However, this DEI dean should absolutely be fired, because she encouraged and justified their behavior when what they need is a kick in the *** - for their own sakes. The Dean of the law school should call a school-wide meeting and ***** them all out and require all of these students to draft apology letters to the judge. The judge should be invited again, and any student who disrupts should expelled.

Click to expand...


Follow up to this...

What Stanford, UC Davis campus chaos has in common with Antifa (msn.com)

A chilling poll was released by 2021 College Free Speech Rankings after questioning a huge body of 37,000 students at 159 top-ranked U.S. colleges and universities. It found that sixty-six percent of college students think shouting down a speaker to stop them from speaking is a legitimate form of free speech. Another 23 percent believe violence can be used to cancel a speech. That is roughly one out of four supporting violence.
 
That might be about right ,majority of college kids think shouting down a speaker is ok.

What is more disturbing is that the last generation hasn't grown up to understand Why it isn't right. They think shouting violence and destruction are ok.
 
Facing Addiction said:
A chilling poll was released by 2021 College Free Speech Rankings after questioning a huge body of 37,000 students at 159 top-ranked U.S. colleges and universities. It found that sixty-six percent of college students think shouting down a speaker to stop them from speaking is a legitimate form of free speech. Another 23 percent believe violence can be used to cancel a speech. That is roughly one out of four supporting violence.
Click to expand...

If shouting down a speaker is a form of free speech then harassing and berating those who interfere with a public speaker on a campus is also a form of free speech. Let's go conservatives. Time to use your free speech to its fullest.
 
The anti war protests against Viet Nam were loud with much shouting. There have been other loud protests from college kids. College kids are loud. We were. Weren't you?
But these college kid protestors are louder and more entitled.
But as I said what concerns me more is they don't seem to be growing up even in their 30's. Still feel entitled and even worse No one tries to stop the violence and damages
 
Anybody shocked that something like this happened???

‘Boys go in and take photos of the girls’ at school’s unisex loos (msn.com)

AA18G2cT.img
 
Mr. Deez said:
What apparently set up the freakout at Stanford Law School. This would have been massively frowned upon when I was in law school - not just because it's rude but because someone doing this kind of thing would look massively weak - both mentally and emotionally.

And I fear for the future of the legal profession. No client should ever trust a lawyer who's this weak. If you can't handle a speaker who disagrees with you, how will you handle things in the courtroom if they don't go as you expect? You have to keep your composure whether you're doing great or losing your ***. If you can't, then you shouldn't be in the profession.

What should happen? Not sure I'd expel the students. People in their early 20s do stupid things, and that generally shouldn't define their careers and lives. However, this DEI dean should absolutely be fired, because she encouraged and justified their behavior when what they need is a kick in the *** - for their own sakes. The Dean of the law school should call a school-wide meeting and ***** them all out and require all of these students to draft apology letters to the judge. The judge should be invited again, and any student who disrupts should expelled.

Click to expand...

Did you read what the students did to the law school dean after her class on the Constitution?
 
Monahorns said:
No. But if it was the least bit threatening and face to face the dean should have pulled a gun on them.
Click to expand...
No, about 2/3 of the law students lined the hallway staring at her in silence behind masks as she walked back to her office from the classroom.
 
Garm I understand
We will never know. I would like to think there was no physical altercation with Beard
But we see here with this Stanford case and others where the Me Too wrecks peoples lives.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top