Who’s the 4th team in the sw pod? I only see three
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1.) That's almost like saying they'd prefer to hang out with the lepers. All I do is lose recruits to California and other West Coast Schools including recently Texas. So I would say they would rather come here I Texas would probably rather they did not.1.) Arizona schools want no part of the Big XII, and vice versa. They want and need the California exposure.
2.) Stanford and USC want zero part of the travel expenses associated with the Big XII, nor would they entertain such thoughts.
Stan, I like going with the two highest ranked teams, with tie breaker caveats.Dukesteer, I assume the 16 team PAC conference you propose would have a championship game? Who would get in it? The two conference teams with the best conference records, regardless of their pods?
This game is certainly vindicating Tim Beck's decision to have us throw a dozen passes at or behind the the LOS against Oklahoma....
I think I was an intentional points concession by LSU.Missed field goal LSU. Just stick to touchdowns guys
SH, certainly a dilemma but as you know, everything can be negotiated. While the LHN has been a financial windfall for Texas, the venture has been a failure otherwise. If the LHN is an albatross around our necks, we cannot allow it to preclude us from making the best long term decision for the school.Duke,
Just curious, which do you favor?
1) Dissolving the LHN and paying ABC $15 million a year for the remainder of the twenty years.
2) Keeping the LHN and someway merging it with the PAC network, while sharing the $15 million each year with other members and pay the non Texas part back to ABC - roughly $14 million a year.
Not sure. That would have to be determined. Tech might be the most logical choice.Who’s the 4th team in the sw pod? I only see three
Because that's all they can see and we do not yet have the technology to have a video feed from under the pile?Why do refs think that whichever guy ended up grabbing the ball way last after 2 minutes of a pileup is going to always be the same guy who actually recovered the ball by rule?
Which is precisely why those teams have to come here to the stronger conference.And thus the real issue involving Texas and anything other than the Big XII:
- Academia would vote unanimously for the PAC-12, but putting up with the Stanford and USC antics would be like having 2 ou's to deal with.
I suspect that waiting to unpile everyone and not giving players any incentive whatsoever to do so quickly is less accurate than making the ruling the moment somebody appears to dive on the ball and keep it would be.
You don’t think that the opportunity to play Texas — and potentially open up the most fertile recruiting ground in the country — would offset this desire to play the SoCal team’s every year?DS, I agree but good only on paper. One of the political issues in the PAC-12 is everyone wants to play SC and UCLA every season for recruiting purposes. Spreading them out over 3 divisions is a non-starter.
I think only two defensive starters were out.But it makes for a good excuse for getting blown out.Yes. Baylor would have pummeled OU minus all these defensive starters!
I’ll guarantee it.Dear Lord, please grant us a good, competitive game tonight.
Unfortunately no. California bravado holds no respect Texas (including the quality of Texas high school football).You don’t think that the opportunity to play Texas — and potentially open up the most fertile recruiting ground in the country — would offset this desire to play the SoCal team’s every year?
* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC