Okay, as a hockey guy, here are my thoughts on game 1.
The difference in officiating between Stars/Sharks #6 vs. Stars/Wings #1 could not be any greater. Dallas came out playing just like they left off. The roughing call to put Dallas down 5-on-3 was horrible (at least if they'd called Ott, I could stomach it). The fact that they were already down a man makes it despicable. The fact that the officiating continued that way was bad, but the Stars should have adapted. If the zebras continue calling this series like it's Michelle Kwan vs. Nancy Kerrigan, the series is already over.
Kudos to Detroit for capitalizing on the gifts they were given. If they hadn't managed to convert on 3 of the power plays it would've been a very different game. I'm not saying Dallas would've won, but it would have been more entertaining for outsiders to watch.
I see it that Dallas has to solve 3 problems to win the series:
1) How to handle Holstrom/Franzen around the net: Tips, screens, and rebounds are not highlight reel plays, but they're always available in every game. Those two guys are awesome at what they do and unless Dallas solves the problem, the Wings can bank on 1 or 2 goals per game from those situations for the entire series. I'd suggest two things: order Marty to the top of the crease (hoping to draw contact and a penalty), and/or place a D where the forward tries to drop anchor (force the forward to bump into Marty or move around the Stars' D). You could also let the forward stand there unmolested and play the shooting/passing lanes. Ordinarily that's what I'd prefer, but Detroit moves the puck too well.
2) Losing face-offs: Detroit is a possession team. If they win a draw, you're chasing from the beginning. If there are 60 faceoffs in a game and you lose 2/3 of them, you have to force 10 more turnovers just to get even. And with Detroit, more than any other team in the NHL, this is exhausting. Getting Barnes back will help, but Ribiero/Richards/Modano need a much better effort.
3) Finish their checks: As a finesse team, Detroit is less effective when they're getting tenderized. Additionally, the way to stop puck cycling is by knocking the guy passing the puck on his ***. The danger is two-fold: if you miss a check, you've just created an odd man situation and potential scoring chance; and (considering McCreary's whistle work last night) you could get tapped for Interference.
You say "What about the offense?" I know the Stars only scored 1 goal on 21 shots, but a lot of that has to do with 1) Detroit playing in a shell with a 3 goal lead and 2) Dallas spending most of the game chasing/defending. If they aren't trailing by 2 or more and if they aren't in their own zone most of the game, the shots and scoring will come up.
I don't know if they can solve problem #1. I expect at least 1 goal per game from Holmstrom/Franzen.
They'll improve on problem #2 (especially in Dallas where the Wing's center will need to touch his stick down first), but they need to be winning more than half the faceoffs to win the series. I think they'll fall a little short.
Problem #3 is mostly up to the refs. If we see games called like the regular season, we'll see a lot of Detroit power plays and Dallas becoming passive on the forecheck. Both those would be lethal to the Stars. The NHL shouldn't like it either: you'll have Detroit getting early leads on power play goals and then going into a shell. In other words, boring hockey interspersed with power plays.
I'm biased for Dallas, but I'd rather see the a game played much like the 1st overtime of the Stars/Sharks marathon.
And somehow I can't help but think that the psychology of the Wings' dominance of the Stars is the 800 pound gorilla that I'm ignoring.
Whew. That was a lot of typing.