C
Coelacanth
Guest
You're straying from the topic, which is, and was, the question of whether Augustine, in offering us an account of evil, was “deluding himself, or at least refusing to do the obvious math” with regard to God “as conceived by Christians”. This is the assertion that has been made by you and GT WT. So far, all that has happened is that you have pointed and said 'look' and, seeing nothing, I said 'I don't see anything.' 'Keep looking,' you said, 'there is something there and this is how I see it.' I looked further and said 'I don't think there's anything there, and I can't see why you think that the thing you describe is there.' At some point there stops being a reason to keep looking for 'something' where there appears to be nothing.
And so I ask: what is the substance of your belief that Augustine, in offering us an account of evil, was “deluding himself, or at least refusing to do the obvious math” with regard to God “as conceived by Christians”.
The circumstance affords you three options: (1) show us the science that refutes Augustine; or (2) follow the historicist approach and join with Augustine in “making **** up”; or (3) concede that reason allows us an approach to the parts of truth that lie beyond our knowledge.
And so I ask: what is the substance of your belief that Augustine, in offering us an account of evil, was “deluding himself, or at least refusing to do the obvious math” with regard to God “as conceived by Christians”.
The circumstance affords you three options: (1) show us the science that refutes Augustine; or (2) follow the historicist approach and join with Augustine in “making **** up”; or (3) concede that reason allows us an approach to the parts of truth that lie beyond our knowledge.