Kamala = always gracious going down (in defeat that is...)

You have to say WOW on that one. WOW that you're seeing it on CNN.
A Conservative talking head on CNN. Yep...he's a regular and gets to have his say...no diversions to Mogadishu or how it relates to victims of undocumented immigrantss like liberals have to deal with on Fox News.
 
So twice recently you have tried to defend the tokenism of the NYT and now CNN.

Are you proud of them hiring their token conservative talking heads?
 
I prefer less biased media and reporters that are actually interested in facts rather than a accepting than repeating the partisan narrative. Like the ******** that no Minnesota National Guardsmen woukd defend Walz when in fact quite a number of them did. Many conservative media made the criticism sould unanimous. They were either lying, incompetent or not tring very hard. Liberal media, like on Charlottesville pull the same crap and get called out for it on these threads. If we blindly accept ******** ...then that's all we are going to get. I know some want exclusively media that reinforce their biases. FOX and the NYPost do that for conservatives.
 
I prefer less biased media and reporters that are actually interested in facts rather than an accepting than repeating the partisan narrative. Like the ******** that no Minnesota National Guardsmen woukd defend Walz when in fact quite a number of them did. Many conservative media made the criticism sould unanimous. They were either lying, incompetent or not tring very hard. Liberal media, like on Charlottesville pull the same crap and get called out for it on these threads. If we blindly accept ******** ...then that's all we are going to get. I know some want exclusively media that reinforce their biases. FOX and the NYPost do that for conservatives.
True or false?

 
I prefer less biased media and reporters that are actually interested in facts rather than a accepting than repeating the partisan narrative. Like the ******** that no Minnesota National Guardsmen woukd defend Walz when in fact quite a number of them did. Many conservative media made the criticism sould unanimous. They were either lying, incompetent or not tring very hard. Liberal media, like on Charlottesville pull the same crap and get called out for it on these threads. If we blindly accept ******** ...then that's all we are going to get. I know some want exclusively media that reinforce their biases. FOX and the NYPost do that for conservatives.
I would have liked to see some of these posts regarding his service.
 
I would have liked to see some of these posts regarding his service.
I used to post links here, but they were apparantly invisible to the partisans. Anyone with interest and near normal intelligence could use Google and find contrary viewpoints on Walz military service in less than one minute. Critical thinking/reading change your world. It makes you more curious and tolerant for diverse viewpoints. Obviously that's not for everybody.
 
Last edited:
I used to post links here, but they were apparantly invisible to the partsans. Anyone with interest and near normal intelligence could use Google and find it in less than one minute. Critical thinking/reading change yulour world. It makes you more curios and tolerant for diverse viewpoints. Obviously that's not for everybody.
I like the twitter posts because I can read the comments to see the counter argument.
 


It's hard. People are telling him to just quit his job, but it isn't as though he'd have a lot of options if he did. ESPN is MSNBC with footballs. Everybody knows they're left wing hacks. But what sports network is ok with people arguing that dudes don't belong in women's sports? I don't know of any. The point is that he wouldn't just be losing his job. He'd probably be losing his career.
 
I prefer less biased media and reporters that are actually interested in facts rather than a accepting than repeating the partisan narrative. Like the ******** that no Minnesota National Guardsmen woukd defend Walz when in fact quite a number of them did. Many conservative media made the criticism sould unanimous. They were either lying, incompetent or not tring very hard. Liberal media, like on Charlottesville pull the same crap and get called out for it on these threads. If we blindly accept ******** ...then that's all we are going to get. I know some want exclusively media that reinforce their biases. FOX and the NYPost do that for conservatives.

Honestly, what makes me believe the stolen valor case is the response from Walz and his defenders in the media and elsewhere. What I hear is that Vance is "attacking his service." Or I hear defenders say what a good soldier he was. None of those are a defense. They are diversions. What would be a defense is evidence that he actually did see combat or that he actually did achieve the rank at issue. I have seen anything to that effect.

And claiming anyone is attacking his service is actually deception. Vance isn't doing that. If I ran for office and claimed to have have been a judge (when I wasn't) and my opponent called me on my lie, that wouldn't be "attacking my legal career." It would be calling me on a lie. The same thing is what Vance is doing.

Do I like this kind of non-issue controversy? No. I think we should be talking about policy. But the public doesn't want to do that, and neither does Harris other than to say Trump will push a national abortion ban, which he already has disavowed. We don't have serious policy discussions anymore. They require literacy and arithmetic, and we don't have those skills anymore.
 
Again just putting it out there. Yes understand it’s part of campaign back and forth but wonder if it will get traction?

 
A Conservative talking head on CNN. Yep...he's a regular and gets to have his say...no diversions to Mogadishu or how it relates to victims of undocumented immigrantss like liberals have to deal with on Fox News.
I’ve heard him before and screamed at the TV when he doesn’t refute open lies by the network and liberal pundits.
 


I'm not a big fan of Guttfeld, and his sophomoric humor on his own show, but on the Five he often has some serious talking points. Here is a great example of that, and he absolutely nails it. I have never seen him this emotional before

As an aside, another bonus of watching the Five is Harold Ford, Jr. when he is on.
I respect his so much , he appears as the Democratic voice on the show.
H is an old school Dem, smart, kind, fair, who has real solutions to how to work with both sides of the aisle.
I wish he was running, he would most likely have my vote.
 
Last edited:
So We give people 25k as down payment on a house. Will Kammie vet the recipients to make sure they can make the monthly payments OR pay the property taxes she thinks will be a "return on investment".
IIRC correctly a version of this ended in disaster not that long ago
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top