Because Schiff can speak over them and instruct the witness not to answer.
Impeachment
- Thread starter mchammer
- Start date
Because Schiff can speak over them and instruct the witness not to answer.
Joe Fan
10,000+ Posts
Also worked with Susan Rice and DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa, who worked to dig up dirt on Paul Manafort.
I35
5,000+ Posts
yes let’s believe an individual over the actual transcript. Liberal Logic?
I35
5,000+ Posts
I was starting to think it was John Brennen himself. And after the outing I was right.
OUBubba
5,000+ Posts
A. The individuals all mirror what was said in the "transcript".
B. The "transcript" is not complete. It is a summary. Why release a "transcript" when it is not complete? Redact what you need to but it smells funny. It's smelled funny since the beginning.
The Trump Administration has no self perception. They thought this call summary would clear them. It serves as Exhibit 1. Knowing that a transcript should be made available to investigators will only, eventually, show who's telling the truth here.
If I were on the gang of 8 I'd think it reasonable to get full transcripts of many of trump's calls. Calls to Russia around this time period, calls to Erdregon, etc. Not that I would need to know any of it but I'd like to think that a small, principled, bipartisan group could verify that we didn't sell out the Kurds for a new Trump Tower. I know Trump had to get something out of the Turkey thing. I thought it was Bagdhadi. Turns out we've been on him for a while now and our pulling out of Syria so quickly almost screwed them up. We pulled out so fast that we had to bomb our own supplies we left behind and NOW we're going in to protect the oil. Like, we forgot it was there? Weird.
I35
5,000+ Posts
a) If the individuals all mirror what was said in the transcript then what’s the problem?
b) I’ve heard this claim that there’s more, but I haven’t seen anybody show proof of this. Is this some ones word vs the rest?
Trump released the transcript immediately and the Dems didn’t know what to do because they weren’t expecting that he would. You libs are always playing gotcha and are always so sure of yourself only to look foolish later. It’s like you never learn.
OUBubba
5,000+ Posts
A. Trump and Co. report that the "transcript" is complete. "word for word, comma for comma".
2. At least one person who was in on the call has said that he recommended edits to the "transcript" that were not made.
III. The "transcript" is fairly clear that it is a quid pro quo. You investigate this corruption that I want you to investigate (even though it has been debunked) and you'll get your White House visit and your money. It is crystal clear when combined with the receipts that Mr. Taylor brought in the form of text messages.
d. The professionals/bureaucrats in the narrative are concerned that the appropriated funds for Ukrainian security are going to not get to the Ukrainians because if the fiscal year expired then the funding would have gone away. That's why there was a flurry in August/September.
v. He also released the picture of Pelosi standing up to him thinking that it would make him look good and her bad. Turns out she may get it tattooed on her lower back. Zero self perception and only "yes" men around him. This is what you get when all you're left with are Stephen Miller and someone who says things like "the 4 star General was just not prepared to handle President Trump's genius."
I35
5,000+ Posts
So you are saying the transcript proves Quid Pro Quo?
The Ukrainians didn’t even know funds were being held back. So how can Trump leverage funds when Ukraine didn’t even know until reports came out from the media way after the phone call meeting? Back to the analogy of the parents grounding their kid. Is the kid really grounded if the parents never told their child he or she is grounded. Also why does everyone collaborate the transcript and the Ukraine leaders said they didn’t know or feel any kind of pressure to investigate the Bidens? You people are unreal. Even Tom Brokaw who is a huge liberal hack said “The Democrats don’t have the goods on Trumps”. This is a nothing burger. Actually let me correct myself. This is a something burger. More specifically it’s actually a “coup burger”So you are saying the transcript proves Quid Pro Quo?
But......but......but Taylor!
I35
5,000+ Posts
PELOSI: “This is a sad day. It’s a sad day because nobody comes to Congress to impeach a president of the United States. No one.”
Say What?
" Speaking at a MoveOn event in Washington, DC, just hours after being sworn in, Tlaib — the first Palestinian-American woman in Congress — said, “ we’re gonna go in there and we’re gonna impeach the ************!’”
Say What?
" Speaking at a MoveOn event in Washington, DC, just hours after being sworn in, Tlaib — the first Palestinian-American woman in Congress — said, “ we’re gonna go in there and we’re gonna impeach the ************!’”
So Morris testified today.
NEWS: CBS News has learned NSC's Senior Director for European Affairs Tim Morrison was on the Trump-Zelensky call and told the investigating committees, "I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed.
Morrison also testified that the memorandum of the call released by the White House is accurate to his recollection and he does not know the WB's identity. "
Must have pained CBS to report that.
NEWS: CBS News has learned NSC's Senior Director for European Affairs Tim Morrison was on the Trump-Zelensky call and told the investigating committees, "I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed.
Morrison also testified that the memorandum of the call released by the White House is accurate to his recollection and he does not know the WB's identity. "
Must have pained CBS to report that.
Comical to hear Pelosi, Nadler, and Schiff touting the Constitution earlier today. Saying Trump is going against the Constitution by saying he has said he can do whatever he wants. I don't remember his saying that.
Did they call out Hillary, RBG, and the others who have called for the Electoral College to be abolished? That is a direct hit on what the Founders wanted.
Did they call out Hillary, RBG, and the others who have called for the Electoral College to be abolished? That is a direct hit on what the Founders wanted.
Sorry, I deleted my question once I figured it out.
Morrisson also supposedly said that Ukraine knew nothing about the delay in military aid. He also mentioned that *drumroll* Taylor made several false statements.
Last edited:
I35
5,000+ Posts
She's not sad. It's a very cynical statement on her part. She truly believes we are that stupid.
Joe Fan
10,000+ Posts
Steve Bannon doesnt like her politics but he does admire her toughness and skill as a parliamentarian. He says that, with this move, she is running "a master class in political warfare."
Do Trump haters really think Americans will think this is fair?
"
Under the House Judiciary procedures, Trump and his counsel will be invited to attend all panel proceedings and ask questions. They can also request additional evidence or witness testimony, but the “committee shall determine whether the suggested evidence is necessary or desirable.”
"
Under the House Judiciary procedures, Trump and his counsel will be invited to attend all panel proceedings and ask questions. They can also request additional evidence or witness testimony, but the “committee shall determine whether the suggested evidence is necessary or desirable.”
FIFY.
Strangely, your credibility was greater when you were supporting the Russian collusion falsehoods with a heavy emphasis on “pee” .
Weekly Prediction Contest
* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC
Recent Threads
-
Post Right Wing looniness here
- Started by Seattle Husker
- Replies: 1K
- West Mall
-
The Media Industry
- Started by texas_ex2000
- Replies: 8K
- West Mall
Prediction Results Threads
