You do understand that this doesn't discredit anything he said, right?
It also doesn't look good either (if the story is true).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do understand that this doesn't discredit anything he said, right?
It also doesn't look good either (if the story is true).
Well, they said the same thing about Comey. It turns out he was nuts. Taylor appears to be in cahoots with McCain and Soros.You do understand that this doesn't discredit anything he said, right?
It's pretty inconsequential.
Explain that to me please.
Lots of things don't look good. It's pretty inconsequential.
I kind of agree with this. I mean he could literally gun down someone on 5th Avenue or grab someone by the poontang and the Senate would not impeach him. The only thing I disagree with is that it won't go that fast. The GOP wants to get past it. The left wants to take their time so he's leaking fluids come next summer. The impeachment process for Clinton took almost a year. I can't see it being over in two months.Steve Bannon thinks Pelosi is well-organized has been planning to take back the House and impeach since Nov 9, 2016. He admires their work ethic on this. He says Pelosi has the process mapped out and has already drawn up two articles of impeachment (1) abuse of power, and (2) obstruction of justice. And perhaps some other theories. He thinks the whole process will be 6 to 8 weeks. There will be a vote in the House to impeach before or around Thanksgiving (requiring only a simple majority of those present). And then a Senate trial before Christmas (requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote of those present). He thinks the Admin has either been too busy to deal with them effectively or perhaps was not taking it very seriously.
Bannon also thinks the Dems have no 'smoking gun,' that there is no 'smoking gun' and they are going to try to get Trump using the process itself. He thinks the Dems already know they cannot actually remove Trump from office. So what it is really about is the process itself. They will just pile on everything they can pile on, every day.
So it is a little ironic how the Dems look at Trump versus the way some Republicans look at him, especially the Never-Trumpers. The Dems recognize that Trump is a transformative President. The federal judges are a big part of it but its everything really - fighting the globalists, getting rid of bad trade deals, fighting China, immigration, deconstruction of the administrative state, getting us out of endless wars. The Dems know Trump is going to be in their their lives in a meaningful way not just for the next 5 years, but for the next 10, 20 or 30 years. So what they are really after is to stop the arc of his presidency. They want to affect the 2020 election too, but the main goal is to blunt the direction of Trump presidency. So while the Never-Trumpers may not be smart enough to see the big picture, Pelosi is and she is willing to do anything she can to gut Trump and nullify the results of the 2016 election.
I kind of agree with this. I mean he could literally gun down someone on 5th Avenue or grab someone by the poontang and the Senate would not impeach him. The only thing I disagree with is that it won't go that fast. The GOP wants to get past it. The left wants to take their time so he's leaking fluids come next summer. The impeachment process for Clinton took almost a year. I can't see it being over in two months.
If this is an impeachment proceeding allowed under our Constitution why are the Dems ignoring the procedure as allowed under it?
Why are they having secret hearings and not allowing Republicans subpoena authority? And full access to the transcripts?
If this is an impeachment proceeding allowed under our Constitution why are the Dems ignoring the procedure as allowed under it?
Why are they having secret hearings and not allowing Republicans subpoena authority? And full access to the transcripts?
and due process to defend himself.
What impeachable offense has been committed?
Which procedure are the Democrats ignoring that is spelled out in the Constitution?
Thus far the House has not authorized an impeachment inquiry but have held secret meetings.
Now You answer
What impeachable offense has been committed ?
The Constitution limits grounds of impeachment to "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors".[2] The precise meaning of the phrase "high Crimes and Misdemeanors" is not defined in the Constitution itself.
The notion that only criminal conduct can constitute sufficient grounds for impeachment does not comport with either the views of the founders or with historical practice.[1] Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist 65, described impeachable offenses as arising from "the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust."[3] Such offenses were "political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself."[3] According to this reasoning, impeachable conduct could include behavior that violates an official's duty to the country, even if such conduct is not necessarily a prosecutable offense. Indeed, in the past both houses of Congress have given the phrase "high Crimes and Misdemeanors" a broad reading, finding that impeachable offenses need not be limited to criminal conduct.[4][1]
Some people need to more closely read the constitution. It very specifically says the House investigates and brings the charges and the Senate is where the trial takes place with the Chief Justice of the SC presiding.
That looks like an opinion piece
but to send an impeachment charge to the Senate what will be the offense?
You said the house? You mean a select few democrats in the house right?
* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC