Impeachment

Joe Fan said:
They say that giant horde of biblical level locusts in Africa prove it. Which were supposedly caused by all the coal burning power plants China has built in Africa. Why do they avoid these topics?
And how did this thread morph into a weather thread?
Click to expand...

They are in the hundreds of billions --
Y4Dpyi7U
 
Do you remember the Ceremonial March of the Dunces back in January?

Can you guess what happened on the same day?

Go ahead and try to guess first before looking
It was the same day the coronavirus arrived in the US
EUca3BrWsAEjxee


EUca3BrWkAAPQBO
 
Jan 15 was also the same day the Chinese delegation ceremonially marched into the East Room of the White House to sign Phase One of the US-China trade agreement. By doing this, they risked infecting US leaders, including the POTUS with the WuhanVirus.

By this time, they knew it was highly contagious and deadly.

Two Questions --
Question 1: Was this an "Act of War?"
Question 2: Which ceremonial march was worse?

49391652592_c84b9c1906_b.jpg
 
Joe Fan said:
Atkinson did testify in the secret room
There is a transcript
But Schiff has been hiding it all this time, still has never released it
Why is that?
House Democrats conceal testimony of 18th witness from Trump team
Click to expand...

Trump finally fired this joker. His transcripts have still not been released. Schiff does not want them ever being made public.

Atkinson was --
-- heavily involved with the purported "whistleblower"
-- heavily involved in the "doctoring" of illegal FISA warrants
-- supervised lovebirds Strzok and Page

trump-fires-atkinson-v2.jpg
 
Last edited:
^ I see both sides of this BUT doesn't the company have to use the funds to pay their employees and keep them employed ?
Otherwise we pay them unemployment.
 
You might think Dems would want to be looking into the behavior of China with regard to the coronavirus
But you would be wrong
Instead they are now looking into impeachment Trump again, this time for defunding the WHO
 
All the transcripts involving the impeachment hearings have now been cleared for release
But Adam Schiff is refusing to release them
Why?

 
Garmel said:
As mchammer would say there is some serious taint going on here.
Click to expand...

Nunes said the "most interesting" transcripts will be those of interviews with Obama admin officials, which he more or less suggested will expose the Dems "covering this up."
 
Ed Henry broke the news tonight that DNI Richard Grenell walked a “satchel of documents” over to the Department of Justice on Thursday.

Schiff may be even more panicked right now. Because I’m hearing from two sources familiar with this that as early as tomorrow Rick Grenell, the Acting Director of National Intelligence, could reveal even more documents shedding light on the Russian probe of President Trump and how Schiff and other investigators knew for a long time there was no collusion even as they were saying they had direct evidence there was… There’s a second set of documents that Rick Grenell who now has the job Clapper had brought to the Department of Justice today in a satchel… They say as early as tomorrow we may learn the contents.​

grenell-satchel-600x358.jpg
 
Included in these papers^^^, is supposed to be accounts from the following people
- Susan Rice
- Samantha Powers
- James Clapper
- Ben Rhodes
- Loretta Lynch
- Sally Yates​
all of whom said there was never any evidence of Russian collusion.

Many Americans, including some in here, fell for the whole Russian collusion narrative. And fell hard. You were lied to. You should be outraged today now that the truth is finally making its way to the surface.
 
Last edited:
Crowdstrike, the firm behind the accusation that Russia hacked and stole DNC emails, admitted to Congress that it has no direct evidence Russia actually stole/exfiltrated the emails.


EXdzoplX0AAPLxe


EXdzl_zXsAAUqBX
 
Anyone remember Evelyn Farkas?
She was part of the Obama Team who went on MSNBC to say she had evidence of alleged collusion with Russia
Under oath, she admitted she lied on MSNBC.
She had nothing
Made it all up
This is just some of the information Schiff has been hiding
This woman is now running for Congress, of course. In New York, of course.

“Why don’t we go back to that sentence that I just asked you about. It says ‘the Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about their staff dealing with Russians,” Gowdy said. “Well, how would you know what the U.S. government knew at that point? You didn’t work for it, did you?”
“I didn’t,” said Farkas, a former mid-level Russia analyst who left the federal government in 2015.
“Then how did you know?” Gowdy responded.
“I didn’t know anything,” Farkas said.
“Did you have information connecting the Trump campaign to the hack of the DNC?” Gowdy asked.
“No,” Farkas admitted.
“So when you say, ‘We knew,’ the reality is you knew nothing,” Gowdy asked later during the deposition.
“Correct,” Farkas responded.
Gowdy didn’t stop there.
“So when you say ‘knew,’ what you really meant was felt?” he asked.
“Correct,” Farkas answered.
“You didn’t know anything?” Gowdy continued.
“That’s correct,” Farkas responded.​
Evelyn-Farkas-MSNBC-03022017.jpg
 
Last edited:
Horn6721 said:
JF
Is that in the stuff released yesterday?
Click to expand...
mb227 said:
Yeah, but anyone that does that is a lyin' sack of Schiff.
Click to expand...

Farkas served on the Russia Desk of Obama's Defense Dept. She testified before the HPSCI as part of a look into what they were calling by the misnomer of "Russian Collision in the 2016 Election."

Her testimony (as well as that of everyone else who countered the Democrat Russian narrative) has been hidden as "classified." Why? What was there in Farkas' testimony that should have been classified? Nothing. Not a single thing. She literally says she knew nothing.

So why was it 'classified?" Because it was a House Committee which the Democrats controlled, including these type of restrictions. Letting information like this out hurt their public positions. Basically they were all lying on television but telling the truth while behind closed doors and under oath. I imagine that people like Schiff and Nadler were telling the witnesses something like, "dont worry, we will keep your answers hidden for a long time." And, of course, the truth was the opposite of what Schiff, Pelosi, Nadler and Schumer said it was.

The new acting DNI is who finally pushed this stuff out. Richard Grenell is the gay guy the Democrats hate. In this regard, he is somewhat like Mike Flynn in that they are afraid of him. They have no control over him and worry what he might expose about them, as he has done done here. So they tried to submarine him but failed.

53 HPSCI Transcripts

https://www.dni.gov/files/HPSCI_Transcripts/2020-05-04-Evelyn_Farkas-MTR_Redacted.pdf
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top