Impeachment

Phil Elliott said:
They used to call Joe Liebermann "the emergency conservative".
Click to expand...

It didn't really fit him though. I can't really think of an issue upon which he takes the clearly conservative position. He was generally liberal with occasional moments of moderation. As a good friend of mine used to say, "Lieberman is a liberal who doesn't hate America and Jews, and that makes him look conservative."
 
After Iran offered an 80 million$ bounty to kill Trump George Lopez offered to do it for half.
What a complete POS. He should be charged.
george-lopez-half-assassinate.png
 
Horn6721 said:
After Iran offered an 80 million$ bounty to kill Trump George Lopez offered to do it for half.
What a complete POS. He should be charged.
george-lopez-half-assassinate.png
Click to expand...

If they attack people viciously for snowflake scattering tweets then yes they should go after him.

Lopez is a complete racist. He thinks as a Latino first. Mexico is his cultural light. He does not care about our laws. The tribe comes first.
 
Joe Fan said:
Way to commit Barry
Click to expand...
Thanks! The tie breaker in my mind is that he was in Baghdad. It appears that we weren't ready after the fact as all DJT was loaded with was a low resolution flag gif and we can't confirm if he was working on imminent attacks or not. They should have just said he was inadvertently killed in a strike against terrorist leaders - play silly games, win silly prizes. You know, oops/happy accident.
 
Horn6721 said:
After Iran offered an 80 million$ bounty to kill Trump George Lopez offered to do it for half.
What a complete POS. He should be charged.
george-lopez-half-assassinate.png
Click to expand...

Liberals/progressives get to say and do whatever they want.
There is no check valve
They are running with no governors
We just saw how a progressive comedian can talk about shaving her legs and vaginal area for 30m and they will reflexively howl with laughter, without a moment of thought, eventhough its not really funny. They now behave like those Korean mourners at the funeral parade. They are more Stepford Wives than the Stepford Wives ever were
 
OUBubba said:
I don't get the sense that this was well thought out.
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity I’d like to know your professional opinion that gives you the “sense” that it wasn’t thought out. Because from where I’m standing (and I’m no professional) this seems like any other strike we’ve done. I mean it’s not like we get intelligence of the planning and what’s the next step. I’m sure not privy to any inside information to give me any sense that it’s not thought out. What information are you privy too that it’s not thought out.

OR does the R by the President’s name is what gives you that “sense?”
 
I35 said:
Out of curiosity I’d like to know your professional opinion that gives you the “sense” that it wasn’t thought out. Because from where I’m standing (and I’m no professional) this seems like any other strike we’ve done. I mean it’s not like we get intelligence of the planning and what’s the next step. I’m sure not privy to any inside information to give me any sense that it’s not thought out. What information are you privy too that it’s not thought out.

OR does the R by the President’s name is what gives you that “sense?”
Click to expand...
When we took out OBL it was announced somberly shortly thereafter. The tweeting out of a flag is odd. From my reading we could have taken this kind of action under the last two Presidents. Heck we probably could have done it under this president but we haven't yet. Why? They talk about an imminent threat but General's are planners and don't do things in a manner that requires imminent action. This appears to have taken a fractured Iran and brought them together. The timing seems odd to say the least.
 
They have hated us my whole life. They chant “Death to America”. The only time they took a break from hating us was when we funded them $150 billion so they could fund terrorist. That was only temporary and continued back to their “Death to American chant. They don’t respect sissies and that was how we came across when Obama was President. I have no problem flexing our muscles and telling them there’s a new sheriff in town. They’ve been challenging us for year. After they release our hostages in the late 70s they started their terrorist acts beginning in 1982. They’ve been doing something pretty much every year since then and we have done absolutely nothing about it. You can only let them kick you in the nuts so many times before you have to knock them out. They’ve bullied us and it was getting worse and worse every single act. We’ve put redlines down and they just said “Pfffft” because we never acted..... until Trump. They have no business standing up to us and they might have to learn a hard lesson now.

I got bullied from the 4th grade through the 6th grade because this kid intimidated me. He spoke tough and I believed it. Then one day I had enough and didn’t care what the consequences was. I didn’t know if I was going to get my *** beat or not. But that day we were going to find out. I whipped his *** good and from that day forward he never came around where I was and avoided me. I’m not saying war and a school yard scrap is the same. But they both equal respect when you do something about their behavior. I know they are going to retaliate but that’s them thinking we won’t do anything back. We have to keep smacking them down. They are financially in a bind currently and it’s time to make their desire to make WMDs a pipe dream. It’s time and it has to happen. No reason to keep allowing them to kill Americans and keep trying to make chemical weapons. Oh and by the way they never stopped making them even after the $150 billion payoff.
 
I35
That is it exactly. They have not respected us since 79.i forgot the incident with those sailors but I have not forgotten all his other attacks.
Why do people including some on here think if we had not taken out their main strategist they would have left us alone? That is nuts. He was in Iraq to plan more attacks.
No one has given a good reason to not have taken him out.
So they can be pissed we took him out but WE aren't supposed to be pissed when they kill our people? We were not supposed to be pissed when they murdered our Ambassador ? That eould have been a good time to stop this.
 
Horn6721 said:
I35
That is it exactly. They have not respected us since 79.i forgot the incident with those sailors but I have not forgotten all his other attacks.
Why do people including some on here think if we had not taken out their main strategist they would have left us alone? That is nuts. He was in Iraq to plan more attacks.
No one has given a good reason to not have taken him out.
So they can be pissed we took him out but WE aren't supposed to be pissed when they kill our people? We were not supposed to be pissed when they murdered our Ambassador ? That eould have been a good time to stop this.
Click to expand...

I just don’t see how they can’t see what’s happening. Why are we afraid of them? Are we afraid they will kill more Americans? They are doing that anyway when we don’t do anything. Sanctions? It has been crippling their economy, but they’ve gotten worse in their behavior since we did it. They go after tankers and killing innocent people. They are like the little kid in the grocery line that jumps up and down screaming because mommy won’t let them have candy.
 
This, "They are doing that anyway when we don’t do anything. "

That point seems to escape notice by those who think we should have not taken Suleimani out because now they are angry at us
 
OUBubba said:
When we took out OBL it was announced somberly shortly thereafter. The tweeting out of a flag is odd. From my reading we could have taken this kind of action under the last two Presidents. Heck we probably could have done it under this president but we haven't yet. Why? They talk about an imminent threat but General's are planners and don't do things in a manner that requires imminent action. This appears to have taken a fractured Iran and brought them together. The timing seems odd to say the least.
Click to expand...
Somber? I think not.

Also, I think he personally killed OBL. I base that on the number of times he uttered the word "I".
 
Horn6721 said:
This, "They are doing that anyway when we don’t do anything. "

That point seems to escape notice by those who think we should have not taken Suleimani out because now they are angry at us
Click to expand...

It's all about the political strategy. If Iran launches an attack, the Democrats and their press offices at CNN, NYT, etc. will blame it on Trump. We "provoked" them. Of course, the same thing could have been said when OBL was killed, but that wouldn't have served the media's political wishes.
 
I don't give a rats *** what Iran or the hate-America dems think. I have wanted to strafe them every time I see a bunch of camel-jockeys on TV shouting "Death to America" and burning our flag that has been going on since 79. Hell I hope we hit em again. If there is any country in the entire world who has just been asking for it, it's Iran.
 
Joe Fan said:
So you already know about Biden's son and Ukraine. And now you know about Pelosi's son and Ukraine. But wait, that's not all .... Did you know that Kerry’s son/stepson also sits on the board of directors of an energy company doing business in Ukraine? And did you know that Romney's son also sits on the board of directors of an energy company doing business in Ukraine? Coincidence?
More than coincidence? Small world?
Click to expand...

The Washington Times has a good follow up on this idea^. But instead of looking at Biden, Pelosi. Kerry or Romney, they went to the motherlode of it all - Chelsea Clinton

Before Hunter Biden... there was Chelsea Clinton, the only child of former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She was similarly rewarded with jobs and board positions that had absolutely no relationship with that young woman’s interests, life, education or any perceived expertise.

All of this has racked up to what the New York Post reported back in 2015 was an estimated net worth of $15 million for the then-34-year-old. More recently, Barron’s, the finance newspaper, revealed that Chelsea Clinton has now reaped $9 million from a corporate board position. In 2011, while her mother was still secretary of state, she was appointed to IAC/Interactive, an Internet investment company. She receives an annual $50,000 retainer and $250,000 worth of restricted IAC stock units, according to Barron’s.

Ironically, and something the Clintons would be loathed to admit, they like most other American families benefited from President Donald Trump’s leadership and correlating economic renaissance.

The Hill reported, “IAC stock has risen 89%, 50% and 36% in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, a far steeper rise in the broader stock market.” ... Consequently, Chelsea Clinton reported in December of last year her holdings ballooned to $8.95 million.

In 2017, Chelsea Clinton was also named to travel site Expedia’s Board of Directors. Because she’s a … business genius? A travel genius? An investment prodigy? The Hill reported that position “typically earned $250,000 in 2015. … Both IAC and Expedia are controlled by Barry Diller, the business and television mogul, who is a friend of Hillary Clinton.”

In 2011, ... Chelsea signed with NBC News as a “special correspondent.” Politico reported she was rewarded with $600,000 a year to do what ended up being occasional fluffy feature stories. ... just 14 stories in two years and seven months for a total of 58 minutes of airtime." Vanity Fair crunched the numbers and found, after she parted ways with NBC News in 2014, she ended up making $26,724 per minute that she appeared on the network. ...

According to Politico, Marc Lasry, a major Clinton Foundation donor, “employed Chelsea Clinton as a chemical industry analyst at his own hedge fund Avenue Capital Group from late 2006 until 2008. …” You read that right — she was a “chemical industry analyst.” Chelsea’s expertise with chemical issues would seem to be on the same level as Hunter Biden’s expertise with energy issues.

At this rate we should be grateful that Chelsea hasn’t been “appointed” as a brain surgeon somewhere in New York City...."​

More at the link Chelsea Clinton’s dubious ‘earnings’
 
Joe Fan said:
We almost need a new reality show called "Keeping Up With the Bidens"

The Ark judge has ruled Hunter Biden's name must be added to the birth certificate of the child he had with his ex-stripper associate.
Hunter Biden is 'biological and legal father' of Arkansas woman's child, judge rules
Click to expand...
I thought the right supported extra marital affairs with strippers/porn actresses (I hate to merge the two as they are different numbers in the occupational code book). Right?
 
OUBubba said:
I thought the right supported extra marital affairs with strippers/porn actresses (I hate to merge the two as they are different numbers in the occupational code book). Right?
Click to expand...

Are you really trying to turn this conversation from Hunter Biden to Bill Clinton? Lawd help us.
 
‘WinRed’ is a GOP PAC opened last June. It has had a 300% jump in Anti-Impeachment related donations and has brought in over $100M for Trump and Republicans just since July.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top