Impeachment

Sharyl Attkisson notes Bill Barr has suddenly become chatty -- and tries to summarize the info dump

"In each of two video appearances ... Attorney General William Barr provided the same basic information and views about the U.S. intelligence community’s actions against the Trump campaign in 2016 and 2017. A criminal investigation is underway and being led by U.S. Attorney John Durham.

Barr was motivated to make the public statements, he said, by the misreporting and confusion surrounding Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report issued on Dec. 9. It found serious government surveillance abuses but no evidence of political bias on the part of the offending FBI officials and agents.

Below are 24 points Barr felt the need to make after the release of the Horowitz report. (All of the information is attributed to Barr.)

2. The FBI did spy on the Trump campaign. That’s what electronic surveillance is.

4. From “day one,” the FBI investigation generated exculpatory information (tending to point to the targets’ innocence) and nothing that corroborated Russia collusion.

5. It’s a “big deal” to use U.S. law enforcement and intelligence resources to investigate the opposing political party, and I cannot think of another recent instance in which this happened.

7. It was “wrong” for the FBI to presume the Trump campaign was part of a plot. They should have gone to the campaign and discussed their suspicions.

10. As to the FBI’s motive, “that’s why we have Durham.” I’m not saying the motivations were improper, but it’s premature to say they weren’t.

12. Contrary to much reporting, Horowitz didn’t rule out improper motive; he didn’t find documentary or testimonial evidence of improper motive. Those are two different things.

16. The wiretaps allowed the FBI to go back and capture Page’s communications, emails, and other material from weeks, months, and even years ago.

21. Were the four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act judges who approved the four wiretaps against Trump associate Carter Page badly misled by the FBI? Yes

22. Are people going to be held accountable, including at the very top of our intelligence agencies and FBI? Well, they’re all gone.

See the rest here William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty—and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump
 
Here are the vulnerable Dems in Trump Districts

ELrQ7zBWwAMZAPR.jpg
 
I would guess hubris played a role. Until Trump stuff liked this had been swept under the rug. It was a Biden after all.
 
Could still happen

Has jurisdiction been established over Biden? I know the girl is from Arkansas, but my understanding is that she lived in DC at the time of the "consummation." I don't think Biden has ever been a resident of Arkansas.

If you get it on with a chick who used to live in Arkansas, does that create "minimum contacts" with the state of Arkansas to give its courts jurisdiction over you? If so, that's pretty rough. Better make sure you stay away from chicks who have lived in Oklahoma.
 
Has jurisdiction been established over Biden? I know the girl is from Arkansas, but my understanding is that she lived in DC at the time of the "consummation." I don't think Biden has ever been a resident of Arkansas.

If you get it on with a chick who used to live in Arkansas, does that create "minimum contacts" with the state of Arkansas to give its courts jurisdiction over you? If so, that's pretty rough. Better make sure you stay away from chicks who have lived in Oklahoma.

If a man and woman from Arkansas are married in Arkansas under Arkansas law and then are later granted a divorce by an Arkansas court, are they still considered brother and sister?
 
Last edited:
Has jurisdiction been established over Biden? I know the girl is from Arkansas, but my understanding is that she lived in DC at the time of the "consummation." I don't think Biden has ever been a resident of Arkansas.

If you get it on with a chick who used to live in Arkansas, does that create "minimum contacts" with the state of Arkansas to give its courts jurisdiction over you? If so, that's pretty rough. Better make sure you stay away from chicks who have lived in Oklahoma.

I believe he appeared already. He does have listed counsel, which implies an appearance and thus pj. And the local newspaper there said he was forced to submit to a DNA test - presumedly with some type of order entered.
 
Last edited:
Here is a list of those 31 vulnerable House Dems in 2020--all from districts won by Trump--who could now break ranks on the increasingly unpopular impeachment
Tom O’Halleran (D-Ariz.)
Lucy McBath’s (D-Ga.)
Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.)
Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.)
Abby Finkenauer (D-Iowa)
Dave Loebsack (D-Iowa)
Cindy Axne’s (D-Iowa)
Jared Golden (D-Maine)
Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.)
Haley Stevens (D-Mich.)
Angie Craig (D-Minn.)
Collin Peterson (D-Minn.)
Susie Lee’s (D-Nev.)
Chris Pappas’s (D-N.H.)
Jefferson Van Drew (D-N.J.)
Andy Kim (D-N.J.)
Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.)
Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.)
Xochitl Torres Small (D-N.M.)
Max Rose (D-N.Y.)
Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.)
Antonio Delgado (D-N.Y.)
Anthony Brindisi (D-N.Y.)
Kendra Horn(D-Okla.)
Matt Cartwright (D-Pa.)
Conor Lamb (D-Pa.)
Joe Cunningham (D-S.C.)
Ben McAdams (D-Utah)
Elaine Luria’s (D-Va.)
Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.)
Ron Kind (D-Wis.)

So people have been calling the offices of these 31 vulnerable Dems. As far as we know, not a single of of them has been willing to take a public position on impeachment - either way.
 
I believe he appeared already. He does have listed counsel, which implies an appearance and thus pj. And the local newspaper there said he was forced to submit to a DNA test - presumedly with some type of order entered.

Yet even more happy news for the Biden family
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top