Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd bet someone money that most of those people were democrat voters.
Mus
Why do you do that? Ignore what is actually being posted but post false meanings so you think you are making a point?
NO ONE in this thread has posted that people using food banks are "sucking at the government teat".
gets old
How come the people at the food banks are considered as sucking the government’s teat, but the CEO of Boeing and the hedge fund managers being bailed out by the federal reserve relieving them of their junk bonds are deserving capitalists essential to the well being of America? What’s the difference?
Amazing.That question deserves no answer. This was a great board and then 2 weeks ago, probably further back Longest, and Mus just started throwing rotten tomatoes at all of us. I Love God, my Country, and Texas. I want everyone to be ok and thrive again.
I don’t want food shortages or O&G to cease to exist. I’m going to start volunteering where I can. Houston Food Bank appears to need help. Let’s volunteer more and fight with Mus and Longest less!
“I'd bet someone money that most of those people were democrat voters.”You made an inference based on context. As did Garmel. I’ve done the same. Now answer my question if you can. What’s the difference between state funded welfare and state funded corporate bailouts?
How come the people at the food banks are considered as sucking the government’s teat, but the CEO of Boeing and the hedge fund managers being bailed out by the federal reserve relieving them of their junk bonds are deserving capitalists essential to the well being of America? What’s the difference?
How come the people at the food banks are considered as sucking the government’s teat, but the CEO of Boeing and the hedge fund managers being bailed out by the federal reserve relieving them of their junk bonds are deserving capitalists essential to the well being of America? What’s the difference?
The Wall Street editorial board is a notoriously conservative group, usually supporting conservative policies and Republican presidents.
So, when the WSJ writes an op-ed hammering the sitting GOP president, it's worth standing up and taking notice.
Except on West Mall. And TexAgs.
Fake News!
If Boeing uses the loan as intended, they don’t have to pay it back.(1) the state funded welfare recipients don't have to pay back the benefits they receive. Boeing has to repay the loans they take.
Yes, but executive compensation is tied to stock. Without the government intervention, stock price craters. Even you know that.(2) Boeing has to maintain their work force, limit executive pay, and not buyback stock as a condition of receiving loan guarantees. Individual recipients are not getting loans.
Yeah, and without a bailout, Boeing likely no longer employs them. If the purpose of the bailout is to provide income for employees that have been furloughed, why not just pay them directly rather than through Boeing?(4) Boeing has over 150,000 employees. Welfare recipients don't employ people
Boeing has just become a welfare recipient. Ongoing GDP attributed to Boeing is not due to generic activity but rather dependent on government largesse. Basically Boeing is now a collaborative project where the government provides welfare and private ownership directs operations and reaps profits. In other words, fascism.(6) Boeing contributes to the overall GDP in a more significant manner than an individual welfare recipient
Well I hope this oversight does a better job than was done with AIG when they received their bailout and then back doored large payments to Goldman Sachs.(7) The CEO of Boeing does not receive the loan guarantees. The company does. The company is subject to a vast array of regulations and oversight. An individual welfare recipient does receive welfare directly, and the oversight of their actions is virtually zero.
I hope you are correct and wish your business good luck. We differ on much, but at this point I think you are sincere and don’t believe you to be a jerk. I do agree with your call that cryptocurrency has potential.Thanks guys for picking up on the responses. I just don’t have the patience or time to argue this **** with those two! My online store is ready, I’ll be taking CC and Bitcoin. Problem is I don’t want to start advertising heavily until after they lift the quarantine. I got 1,000 likes on linked in when I told them what I’m doing. I’m giving some proceeds to Wounded Warrior project and Camp Hope for PTSD recovery. I do think one good thing coming out of this quarantine is more businesses will give more back to the community.
if they had value, the yields wouldn’t be skyrocketing and the fed wouldn’t have intervened. If your 401K is collapsing, the fed doesn’t care. But if a powerful hedge fund (which produces zero in goods and services) is in trouble, it must not be allowed to fail.First off the term Junk bond implies that the debt is worthless. They are not, their actual name is high yield bonds taken out by companies and sometimes governments with poor credit so they pay a higher interest rate.
It is clear you have not read the law because you have no idea what is in the text. These loans are specifically prohibited from being forgiven.If Boeing uses the loan as intended, they don’t have to pay it back.
No, I don't that stock price will crater without government intervention, and neither do you. In fact, in is seriously doubtful that Boeing will accept any government guaranteed loan. They can just issue equity shares or borrow on their own. Regardless, the CEO won't benefit from the company's current situation regardless of the road they take.Yes, but executive compensation is tied to stock. Without the government intervention, stock price craters. Even you know that.
Again, you are wrong. There may not even be a "bailout", which is an incorrect term. Regardless, Boeing will maintain the requisite number of employees to sustain its business for the long haul given the market cycles and unusual situations.Yeah, and without a bailout, Boeing likely no longer employs them. If the purpose of the bailout is to provide income for employees that have been furloughed, why not just pay them directly rather than through Boeing?
Right, except you're wrong. Boeing has not accepted "welfare" and never will. They may take on debt guaranteed by the government. If they do, the government receives warrants, senior debt instruments, or equity, so the government will benefit from its investment to the same extent as any other equity holder, and will actually have a senior debt position to other creditors.Boeing has just become a welfare recipient. Ongoing GDP attributed to Boeing is not due to generic activity but rather dependent on government largesse. Basically Boeing is now a collaborative project where the government provides welfare and private ownership directs operations and reaps profits. In other words, fascism.
AIG didn't "back door" anything. They paid the claims made on the guarantees they sold. They met their contractual obligations to Goldman.Well I hope this oversight does a better job than was done with AIG when they received their bailout and then back doored large payments to Goldman Sachs.
It is clear you have not read the law because you have no idea what is in the text. These loans are specifically prohibited from being forgiven.
No, I don't that stock price will crater without government intervention, and neither do you. In fact, in is seriously doubtful that Boeing will accept any government guaranteed loan. They can just issue equity shares or borrow on their own. Regardless, the CEO won't benefit from the company's current situation regardless of the road they take.
Again, you are wrong. There may not even be a "bailout", which is an incorrect term. Regardless, Boeing will maintain the requisite number of employees to sustain its business for the long haul given the market cycles and unusual situations.
Right, except you're wrong. Boeing has not accepted "welfare" and never will. They may take on debt guaranteed by the government. If they do, the government receives warrants, senior debt instruments, or equity, so the government will benefit from its investment to the same extent as any other equity holder, and will actually have a senior debt position to other creditors.
AIG didn't "back door" anything. They paid the claims made on the guarantees they sold. They met their contractual obligations to Goldman.
Do you have any other egregiously stupid B.S. I can disabuse you of?
Hopefully that's a misspelling and not what I just read on urban dictionary.You’ve been Loboed.
What’s the difference between state funded welfare and state funded corporate bailouts?
You are at least mathematically correct. A few entities receive millions vs millions receiving thousands. Which is greatest?The amount of money involved and distributed to each?
Different definition:You’ve been Loboed.
I guess I’m qualified to be a JP Morgan economist simply by watching the evening news.The immediate future appears to be rather grim. JPMorgan economists cut their second-quarter forecast even more, now expecting the economy will decline by 40%.
Wall Street firms expect contractions in the second quarter of 30% or more.
The economists said the 16.8 million jobless claims filed in the last three weeks indicate a huge surge in job losses, which they estimate at 25 million in April. This is being reported by CNBC. If those projections come true, that's depression era bad.
if they had value, the yields wouldn’t be skyrocketing and the fed wouldn’t have intervened. If your 401K is collapsing, the fed doesn’t care. But if a powerful hedge fund (which produces zero in goods and services) is in trouble, it must not be allowed to fail.
The immediate future appears to be rather grim. JPMorgan economists cut their second-quarter forecast even more, now expecting the economy will decline by 40%.
Wall Street firms expect contractions in the second quarter of 30% or more.
The economists said the 16.8 million jobless claims filed in the last three weeks indicate a huge surge in job losses, which they estimate at 25 million in April. This is being reported by CNBC. If those projections come true, that's depression era bad.
A was.
You are at least mathematically correct. A few entities receive millions vs millions receiving thousands. Which is greatest?
Don't you know? He thinks people who pray are a cancer.People like you don't have the balls to live through a Great Depression, so instead of hoping for one, you might try praying one doesn't happen because it will kill weak minded people like you.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC