Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My understanding is the 34% number reported by the media was an annualized number. It did not drop 34% in one quarter. More like 8.5%.
The stock market endorses the above.I don’t think you are giving enough credit to where it’s due. Trump did a lot of things that really added up. He took the capital gains taxes that was 35% under Obama and made it 21%. Then the threat of raising taxes on American companies that moved away to other countries influenced many American Companies to come back home.
Most Presidents have 0 or maybe one trade agree on their resume. Trump has completed 6 I believe and Is currently has phase 1 done of 3 with China. That would make 7 trade agreements. All those benefit America well.
The tax cuts keep money in the working people pockets so they can spend. Money exchanging hands because of consumer spending helped all. Stock Market although is global the US leads the way on how everyone does. Funny how people every morning wake up to see what the futures are in the East to predict what our market will do. But most of the time the East reacts from the day before on how America did that tends to show what their Market will do. There are things that can happen over night that can make it negative after the final bell rings, but most of the time we dictate the market as we are by far the largest consumers in the world.
The regulations Obama put on our businesses handcuffed them. Deregulating was instant and a big boost. But that can’t be down played. It was big.
More than anything the American people’s confidence in our businessman/president leads the charge. Politics block a lot of good decision that should be made for the economy and there’s some Presidents that seem to not know even the basics of economic. I’ll let you determine who those are.
As far as a recession goes. We are a capitalist country and that alone if a president and Congress gets out of the way will prevent almost all recessions. But government over spends with waste and the % of bigger government with socialist attitude can hurt. Lending to way too many people not qualified to buy homes was part of the last recession with the housing Market crash. That was preventable. Obama actually slowed down the speed of the recovery with his regulations. But what’s going on right now is inexcusable. We were thriving economically and there’s a war going on because of an election. They don’t care how many causalities because getting power is more important. We no longer reward a party for good results. The opposing party is more about trying to present a perception than truth.
I got to see first hand as a business owner how great we did with Trumps economy vs Obama’s. Also I got to see my 401 with stocks do tremendous. It’s already back up. That’s my take.
Phil, you were correct. The 34% is annualized. The actual Q2 was -9.5% for the US.
"Journalists" are so extremely dishonest anymore.
The stock market endorses the above.
Confidence in money printing is the driver for the Market.Yep! Confidence in the economy is the biggest driver for the Market.
Confidence in money printing is the driver for the Market.
And currently money printing = economy. If you take away the hundreds of billions printed (electronically) since the pandemic, consumption disappears, rent payments don’t get paid, more businesses close or fail to reopen. Any positives in the economy at present is correlated to massive deficit spending. That’s a fact.As an investor myself I don’t base my decision on buying or selling stock if money will be printed or not. I look directly at the economy.
And currently money printing = economy. If you take away the hundreds of billions printed (electronically) since the pandemic, consumption disappears, rent payments don’t get paid, more businesses close or fail to reopen. Any positives in the economy at present is correlated to massive deficit spending. That’s a fact.
We are talking about two different things here. My comment was what Trump was accomplishing before the chaos started. You are talking about things that are temporary like the virus and if this was a discussion back in 2001 it would be 911. But we can never not invest because something crazy like 911 or a virus shutting down the country might happen. So you are right about the printing of money. But I got a feeling if Trump’s economy was horrible then there wouldn’t have been a need for a virus panic.
We’ve been printing money for years. That’s just something I don’t put a lot of thought when i’m investing right now. My point is investors don’t weigh if money is being printed or not when buying or selling stocks.
I stand by my original point that confidence or lack of in the economy reflects the market going up or down. Example every election when the President is chosen the market in the next couple of days make drastic changes one way or other. The last couple of years of Obama’s Presidency the market had stalled although rising, but at a very minimal pace. We were printing money then and that hadn’t changed. The Market had a big boost up following the election of Trump. That’s because investors had confidence that a business man would boost the economy. You can’t deny that people invest or not invest on confidence or fear. Remember after 911? The market was working its way back slowly and then the Terrorist hit Spain with the train bombings and people Even in the US bailed. That had nothing to do with money being printed.
The unemployment number that ABC called a "slight" improvement was a month over month move from 11.1% to 10.2% -last I checked, an almost 10% decrease is NOT slight. Just further indicia of how much the mainstream media hates DJT.Unemployment now “improved to 10%”. We are in regular recession mode now. If more states open up due to falling cases, we will be at 6% unemployment by end of year.
No, that's not a fact. I own a business that hasn't missed a beat and doesn't deal with entities that received any money due to the pandemnic. You act as if the money existing in the economy before the pandemic just disappeared, which it didn't.And currently money printing = economy. If you take away the hundreds of billions printed (electronically) since the pandemic, consumption disappears, rent payments don’t get paid, more businesses close or fail to reopen. Any positives in the economy at present is correlated to massive deficit spending. That’s a fact.
The unemployment number that ABC called a "slight" improvement was a month over month move from 11.1% to 10.2% -last I checked, an almost 10% decrease is NOT slight. Just further indicia of how much the mainstream media hates DJT.
I almost think we’ve got a chicken vs egg debate here. Yes, confidence and fear drive investor sentiment which in turn move markets up or down. After each fear driven crash you described (9-11, Covid-19, etc). The response is always the same; increased federal spending and lower interest rates to get the debt machine humming.
None of this money printing with impunity would be possible If the dollar wasn’t the global reserve currency. It’s the demand for dollars which allows the US to print, which makes globalism (printing dollars for goods) possible.
The system where the US dollar defines trade is being challenged by Russia, China, and the many smaller economies that trade with them. We fight them with diplomacy (bribing public officials), sanctions, color revolutions, and military might. We also hold together our allies with the same tools.
As far Trump, on the one hand he’s enacted policies to overturn globalism, hoping to sever the dependent relationship with China and bring back jobs to the US. On the other hand, the harsh tools used to enforce and maintain dollar supremacy are being met with opposition now that both China and Russia are strong enough to fight back. Trump may reside over the end of globalism, but might well be at the cost of eventually seeing the end of the dollar as reserve currency.
No, that's not a fact. I own a business that hasn't missed a beat and doesn't deal with entities that received any money due to the pandemnic. You act as if the money existing in the economy before the pandemic just disappeared, which it didn't.
maybe your business doesn’t directly deal with entities that received money due to the pandemic, but that doesn’t exclude the probability that those businesses you deal with might have received revenue from sources that did. Somewhere down the line income was handed out from the government and eventually found its way to your business. Maybe not directly or even second hand, but if you could trace revenue sources like a family tree, there would be “stimulus and unemployment payments” in there somewhere. And certainly that’s true for owners of restaurants, car dealerships and landlords. To deny that hundreds of billions in printed money Handed out hasn’t made a significant impact to goose consumption is just ignorant.No, that's not a fact. I own a business that hasn't missed a beat and doesn't deal with entities that received any money due to the pandemnic. You act as if the money existing in the economy before the pandemic just disappeared, which it didn't.
To deny that money supply existing prior to the pandemic didn't have a greater impact than that injected after the pandemic is ignorant. The factor is about 18:1 in favor of my point.Maybe your business didn’t receive any
maybe your business doesn’t directly deal with entities that received money due to the pandemic, but that doesn’t exclude the probability that those businesses you deal with might have received revenue from sources that did. Somewhere down the line income was handed out from the government and eventually found its way to your business. Maybe not directly or even second hand, but if you could trace revenue sources like a family tree, there would be “stimulus and unemployment payments” in there somewhere. And certainly that’s true for owners of restaurants, car dealerships and landlords. To deny that hundreds of billions in printed money Handed out hasn’t made a significant impact to goose consumption is just ignorant.