Hillary is not out of the woods yet

Mr. Deez said:
I see your point, but is she being ridiculed because of her physical limitations or because she bullshat everybody about them during the campaign?
Click to expand...

For me it's because it's because she bs everybody. A certain someone also called us conspiracy nuts for not buying into the bs too.
 
VYFan said:
Don’t like Ms. Clinton much, but losing your footing coming down steep steps at her age isn’t really fair game for ridicule.
Click to expand...

Careful, saying anything that isn't 100% anti-Hillary will get you labeled as a liberal around here.

That said, I'll join you. Hillary is dishonest to her core, and is at least borderline unethical if not downright corrupt. She is not nearly accomplished enough to be a viable candidate for president. And her politics have drifted steadily from left of center to way left of center.

That said, the video above does not show infirmity, even to a small degree. I've walked down many steep, ancient staircases like that. Each step is less deep than modern code permits, and because of erosion they are often even shallower than when they were built. The wear is typically worse at the front of each step, such that they slope forward. And to top it off, they can be quite slippery.

In navigating these treacherous conditions, Clinton twice put her foot down too far forward on the step, and the traction on her shoe didn't hold. You can make a case that this shows her to be somewhat clumsy, but there was nothing there to suggest a medical condition. Plus, a longer video shows her walking around just fine after her two slips. All told, Clinton gets around about the same as my 72-year-old mother, who isn't in great shape but isn't an invalid either.

 
NJlonghorn said:
Careful, saying anything that isn't 100% anti-Hillary will get you labeled as a liberal around here....
Click to expand...

There are plenty of people who are not really liberals yet, knowing what they knew about who she is, were still willing to let her become president. They are in their own category.
 
The investigation of Andrew McCabe has some overlap with the Clinton Foundation. The FBI began its own internal look into McCabe first, but then later referred to the DOJ's OIG. The FBI was not happy that the McCabe-directed leak, which he meant to save himself, also revealed that the FBI was investigating the Clinton Foundation, something they did not want public.

Darx8XMXcAA3hW_.jpg
 
A new lawsuit filed in DC alleges a $84 million money-laundering conspiracy by HRC'16 and the DNC in violation of federal campaign-finance law.
The complaint provides detailed evidence from the Federal Election Commission showing Dems undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.
One of plaintiff's counsel, a campaign-finance lawyer, wrote an article in IBD explaining the scheme.
https://www.investors.com/politics/...-clintons-84-million-money-laundering-scheme/

Complaint here
http://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/feclawsuit.pdf
 
Joe Fan said:
Click to expand...


Looks like America will have to actually experience a Socialist President before enough people become "woke" to the problems of socialism. Apparently we can't just look at what's happening in Europe and learn from it. With Bernie and friends promising a chicken in every pot, a free college education, a government job for life, and fill in the blank with what ever else your heart desires, it's probably coming sooner than later. Trump may be the last capitalist before the storm.
 
Clean said:
Looks like America will have to actually experience a Socialist President before enough people become "woke" to the problems of socialism. Apparently we can't just look at what's happening in Europe and learn from it. With Bernie and friends promising a chicken in every pot, a free college education, a government job for life, and fill in the blank with what ever else your heart desires, it's probably coming sooner than later. Trump may be the last capitalist before the storm.
Click to expand...

Some lefties are a little upset over this but, in a somewhat bold move, Hillary was being honest for a change. My issue with what she said is that she called what they support "socialism" but, by definition, it's much closer to fascism.
 
That actually is a fairly plausible explanation for her defeat. It's not true, but it's at least believable when you compare her to Bernie Sanders. Most of her explanations are just laughable. This, by comparison, is at least not totally crazy.
 
Hillary has consistently bad instincts when it comes to picking friends
Birds of a feather, I guess

Dcpo70mUQAArfDQ.jpg

Dcpo7-rV4AAjhn8.jpg

Dcpo8SEUQAI50Qq.jpg

Dcpo7qAUwAIBsmJ.jpg

bill-hillary-6.jpg

GettyImages-143346358-640x480.jpg

e5aa56-20081021-franken20.jpg
 
Here, Hillary makes a big joke of the death of Qaddafi, which she gleefully takes credit for. That 'regime change,' was supposed to be the platform to prove her foreign affairs bona fides in the 2016 election. However, what the passage of time quickly showed is that Hillary created a failed state which Islamists turned into cesspool of extremism. Today, Libya has open markets selling African blacks as slaves. And, of course, there is the blood of 4 dead Americans.



 
Last edited:
Qaddaffi shot down an airliner in the 80s right? Then he made some agreements with GWB to play nice? Then Obama supported Al Qaeda to overthrow him? That's all right? Correct?
 
That ginormous scarf is doing about as much good hiding Hillary's back brace as a skirted swim suit hides the body of a heavy woman.
I don't care is she needs a brace, she probably has osteoporosis, a condition that most elderly women have. It would explain all the recent broken bones.
I just don't understand why she has to try and pretend she isn't wearing a back brace. Just be honest.
Maybe it is impossible for her.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top