Gorsuch 100 Feinstein/Dems 0

C8vuaEPVwAAFToI.jpg
 
Or, removed for senility. She apparently lapses into babbling now.
They were able to let Thurgood Marshall go on like this for years. Nobody on the good side had the guts to do anything about him. However, Ruth Baby does not have the same natural shield around her.

Can we say conclusively that she was wrong?

 
Gorsuch is seated and heard his first case

Interestingly enough, it is a religious liberty case Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer about a a church-owned preschool’s claim that it was blocked from getting a grant for materials to resurface their playground because of its connection to Trinity Lutheran Church.

Gorsuch did not speak until the very end -- he asked the state atty how excluding the church in the specific government program was any “better” than excluding them in a more general government program. The atty claimed selective programs like the one at the center of this case are more visible to the public and could suggest a government endorsement of a religious institution or its mission. Gorsuch was skeptical, and began to press him to explain how the state would go about making such distinctions.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/04/a...eaning-toward-ruling-trinity-lutheran-merits/
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top