Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are going to need a new phrase for this bc virtue signaling doesnt quite describe what they are doing to themselves and much of the EU
.....Soros, who is Hungarian, want to open up EU borders and let it be overwhelmed with Third World Immigration? ...
That guy is a real life Dr. Evil
The NYT cant discuss Merkel's problems without tossing is some gratuitous quotes somehow making it Trump's fault
“The unthinkable has happened,” said Christiane Hoffmann, deputy head of the Berlin bureau of Der Spiegel, a German magazine. In that sense, she said, “This is Germany’s Brexit moment, its Trump moment.
* * *
“Germany is not leaving the EU and it did not elect Donald Trump,” said Mr. Kleine-Brockhoff. “It was unable to form a government on its first attempt. That’s bad. It causes instability. But it’s not the end of the world.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/world/europe/germany-merkel-coalition.html
Come visit Germany while this is still applicable. Saw it on a postcard today.
50 years from now that German postcard will have women dressed according to Islamic dress codes with a heart on there saying "Death to the infidels".
It's official. The EU surrenders. They're begging for the Third World to over run them. George Soros must be happy as a clam.
The EU Commissioner for Migration declares that "neither walls nor policies" can stop migration.
EU President says; "Without Millions of African Migrants, Europe Will Be Lost".
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/12/18/eu-white-mass-migration-norm/
Having said that, there is one facet of the open borders crowd's view that has merit, and that's is Europe's population decline and the long term impact it will have on their economy. The Right needs an answer for that, and so far, I haven't heart one.
Why must The Right come up with a solution for self-inflicted wounds that are predominantly from The Left?
Having said that, there is one facet of the open borders crowd's view that has merit, and that's is Europe's population decline and the long term impact it will have on their economy. The Right needs an answer for that, and so far, I haven't heard one.
I not an economist, but if you have less people, as Europe surely will have without mass migration, why do you need the same size economy as you did when you had more people? Why can't the economy scale back along with the population?
In the 1300s, Europe lost half its population to the Black Plague. If the people running Europe today were in power back then, we'd all be speaking Swahili and have year round tans.
I not an economist, but if you have less people, as Europe surely will have without mass migration, why do you need the same size economy as you did when you had more people? Why can't the economy scale back along with the population?
How do you get people to decide that the independence and lack of responsibility associated with being single isn't worth forgoing the lifetime companionship and personal reward that comes with being married and having children? I don't know, but the answer to that is going to determine whether or not European society as we know it lives or dies in the long term.
That's a Westernization problem. Is there a modern-day example of a country that industrialized that isn't seeing a reducing population? Fewer children seems to be the one truism across cultures whether they be Western (EU or North America), Asia (Japan, China, etc.) or Russia (declining .5%/year).
This isn't simply a problem of reducing our government spend either as the populations are becoming inverted pyramids meaning more old people (the wonders of modern medicine) and less young people.
Mormons don't do this, because their culture values family over just about everything. I'm not saying we all need to convert to Mormonism, but we could use some of their commitment to family.
The church redistributes wealth from well off families to less well off families. That's clearly not the only reason for large families but there is a financial incentive for a large family in the Mormon church.
The church redistributes wealth from well off families to less well off families. That's clearly not the only reason for large families but there is a financial incentive for a large family in the Mormon church.
The Right needs an answer for that, and so far, I haven't heard one.
They've decided that living for themselves is more important than having a family and that there's no value in perpetuating one's culture. I can see why one might blame the Left for people believing this, but regardless of who's mostly responsible for the problem, the problem is real and needs a solution.
As countries industrialize and wealth grows, people stop having kids.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC