Forensic Audit in Maricopa County, AZ

I just find it funny how one side is trying to discredit an audit before it’s completed.

I can look at a ballot and tell if it has been folded or not. I don’t need a machine, but a machine would make that determination a lot faster.

If the audit reveals thousands of illegal ballots for one candidate, the news media will say the auditors are wrong and there is no way thousands of illegal votes occurred. Just my prediction.
 
humahuma said:
I just find it funny how one side is trying to discredit an audit before it’s completed.

I can look at a ballot and tell if it has been folded or not. I don’t need a machine, but a machine would make that determination a lot faster.

If the audit reveals thousands of illegal ballots for one candidate, the news media will say the auditors are wrong and there is no way thousands of illegal votes occurred. Just my prediction.
Click to expand...
They would say that the system was stacked against these voters, which is why they had to use such means to vote.
 
humahuma said:
I just find it funny how one side is trying to discredit an audit before it’s completed.

I can look at a ballot and tell if it has been folded or not. I don’t need a machine, but a machine would make that determination a lot faster.

If the audit reveals thousands of illegal ballots for one candidate, the news media will say the auditors are wrong and there is no way thousands of illegal votes occurred. Just my prediction.
Click to expand...

Can we stop calling this an audit? Here is a presentation from a Rutgers professor on what an audit entails, a financial audit, the but same rules should apply.

upload_2021-4-29_7-12-5.png



Nothing about what AZ doing appears objective.

Call it an investigation because that's what it is. It's not an audit but an investigation for fraud that the team doing the investigation believes exists.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2021-4-29_7-9-48.png
    upload_2021-4-29_7-9-48.png
    387.7 KB · Views: 253
SH so you do realize there are different audits right. I have environmental audits. If you want to call it an investigation, fine with me. I will call it an audit.
 
Seattle Husker said:
Can we stop calling this an audit? Here is a presentation from a Rutgers professor on what an audit entails, a financial audit, the but same rules should apply.

upload_2021-4-29_7-12-5.png



Nothing about what AZ doing appears objective.

Call it an investigation because that's what it is. It's not an audit but an investigation for fraud that the team doing the investigation believes exists.
Click to expand...

OK, I have an idea. Lets add some new Auditors who ARE objective so SH will agree to move forward:
hillary-bill-clinton.jpg
 
Seattle Husker said:
You aren't listening. I want to remove the bias. These attempts to paint everything left or right, my team or the "enemy" are tiresome.
Click to expand...
If that were truly the case, then you would sit back with a big cup of STFU while the audit runs through its paces. Bitching and moaning right now says YOU are the one entering the discussion with a preconceived notion and bias...
 
mb227 said:
If that were truly the case, then you would sit back with a big cup of STFU while the audit runs through its paces. Bitching and moaning right now says YOU are the one entering the discussion with a preconceived notion and bias...
Click to expand...

Wait...because I want to remove the bias I shouldn't care about the bias in the AZ investigation?

You do realize that I'm the one that pointed out the obvious bias and inexperience among outfits conducting the investigation, right? I haven't said "don't audit". Though I think it's a fools errand I said on the first page I was OK with the investigation. My reservation is that the companies engaged are not experienced, have never done this before, are quite biased and thus AZ Republicans should have engaged a much more capable organization that isn't entering the deal with obvious biases. THAT is my preconceived notion. A more capable organization with less bias would have added credibility to their investigation if anything is uncovered. As it is the analysis is predetermined to end up given the same credibility of AGOG in Michigan. It's like Ground Hog Day.
 
Last edited:
Seattle Husker said:
Wait...because I want to remove the bias I shouldn't care about the bias in the AZ investigation?
Click to expand...

Holding a position does not preclude one from being neutral for the task at hand.

Case in point...my career. I generally have no problem with longer sentences for a number of offenses. However, that does not interfere with my ability to work on behalf of clients seeking a favorable vote from the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

But you keep drinking from your MSM bias cup...it has clearly had an undue influence upon you.
 
mb227 said:
Holding a position does not preclude one from being neutral for the task at hand.

Case in point...my career. I generally have no problem with longer sentences for a number of offenses. However, that does not interfere with my ability to work on behalf of clients seeking a favorable vote from the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

But you keep drinking from your MSM bias cup...it has clearly had an undue influence upon you.
Click to expand...

Exactly, if these 4 companies show bias in their final report then I'll join Husker in their condemnation. Till then let's just see where it goes.
 
Vol Horn 4 Life said:
I was there, it was much more glorious in person. It was the fat trailer trash on the top offside that caused the problem even through he was feverishly trying his hardest to shift his lard left.
Click to expand...
The upside down hook’em on the bottom was THE BEST! :)

I’ve tried to find a picture of it but I couldn’t.
 
I always wondered why anyone would do an upside down Horns since that is EXACTLY what a mean *** Longhorn looks like when he is getting ready to dismember an opponent
 
The left is almost totally unaware of that audit and will remain so

they also will not be aware of the NYT retraction re Giuliani today
 
We should wait until after the audit to decide if former AZ State Rep Anthony Kern is biased. He's helping with the counting. Kern was actually on the ballot he's helping count.

Here he is in the counting room.


Here he is standing on the steps of the Capitol building.


Zooming in on the top right picture:
upload_2021-5-3_13-45-43.png


I'm not sure it's the Democrats that are "scared" according to one poster here. The characters have managed to count 31k ballots in 1 week. At that pace this investigation will take 31.71 weeks to complete for the 1.2M ballots. Yes... almost 8 months!
 
Last edited:
OUBubba said:
#fraudit...I like it.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you do. You libs have set yourself up brilliantly. If there's fraud, you're going to make utter fools of yourselves trying to deny what's been found. If there isn't fraud, going after the auditors and their reputations over MSM garbage articles is going to make you look like utter fools. Well done!
 
Seattle Husker said:
We should wait until after the audit to decide if former AZ State Rep Anthony Kern is biased. He's helping with the counting. Kern was actually on the ballot he's helping count.

Here he is in the counting room.


Here he is standing on the steps of the Capitol building.


Zooming in on the top right picture:
upload_2021-5-3_13-45-43.png


I'm not sure it's the Democrats that are "scared" according to one poster here. The characters have managed to count 31k ballots in 1 week. At that pace this investigation will take 31.71 weeks to complete for the 1.2M ballots. Yes... almost 8 months!
Click to expand...

Looks similar to the teacher’s union telling the Biden administration what to do regarding return to school, and the Biden admin “adjusting” the census so blue states lose less Congressional seats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top