Epstein Case

Seattle Husker said:
It's spin. Yes, getting rid of bad employees is important but that doesn't mean hiring good employees is impossible, especially with the vetting apparatus available to a POTUS should they use it.

This debate strategy is similar to the revenue vs spend debate. Spin it that only one side matters in the moment to win an argument.
Click to expand...
Folks have been saying this since 2015. You either have not been listening or avoided Trump websites or forums.
 
Most people are reluctant to fire people. That is 80% of the problem.
Click to expand...
Getting rid of employees who are bad fits for the job is more important than hiring the right people for the job from the get-go.
Click to expand...
hiring is a crapshoot, so firing is more important if you want the best people (eventually).
Click to expand...

This is all true, but it does not follow from that premise that someone who fires people a lot is definitely doing the right thing.
 
And it ignores the turnover in his organizations due to criminal charges. And others that quit because Trump is a moron.

But please, tell us more about how Trump has the skill to build great teams by firing his way to excellence, HammerTime.
 
Chris Christie said Trump's transition team sucked and the severe lack of bvetting during that period is why you have had so many poor hires in the Admin.
 
Seattle Husker said:
Chris Christie said Trump's transition team sucked and the severe lack of bvetting during that period is why you have had so many poor hires in the Admin.
Click to expand...
Cause no one in washington with experience wanted to work with him during the transition
 
LongestHorn said:
And it ignores the turnover in his organizations due to criminal charges. And others that quit because Trump is a moron.

But please, tell us more about how Trump has the skill to build great teams by firing his way to excellence, HammerTime.
Click to expand...
Well somehow he ended up as president. Go figure.
 
Joe Fan said:
Remember that Acosta quote from above?
Epstein Case
D_IT0r7U4AA2JKL.jpg

This guy has a lot of questions to answer

Click to expand...


According to his attorneys, extra passport recovered from Epstein’s home safe with his photo but not his name was Austrian. They say it was “for personal protection in the event of travel to dangerous areas, only to be presented to potential kidnapers, hijackers or terrorists should violent episodes occur.” They claimed “an affluent member of the Jewish faith,” Epstein intended to use it in case he was hijacked.
They did not explain why it was not issued in his name.

D_oK0juXkAInBQc.jpg
 
The 2nd Cir. ordered final redaction requests be made in a document release that should be coming soon. There will be over 2,000 docs released.

ORDER, dated 07/17/2019, ordering the parties Virginia L. Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell to file one-page letter briefs no later than 07/19/2019 indicating any additional locations in the record that might implicate the privacy interests of the individuals named on page 59, line 25 Exhibit KK of the motion for summary judgment, by JAC, RSP, CFD, FILED.[2610854] [18-2868] [Entered: 07/17/2019 02:23 PM]
​
The docs are expected to implicate Epstein and his fellow sex traffickers. The District Court had ordered the records sealed. But some independent attorneys/internet media types have been working hard for a while to get them released. The appellate court agreed.

Probably quite a few folks nervous about this doc dump.
 
A vid from 1992? Srsly.

And NBC speculating on conversation between the 2. :idk: Did they hire a lip reader?
I notice NBC forgot to mention Trump barred Epstein from Mira lago.
FEEBLE attempt NBC
But I see it excited the haters
 
Seattle Husker said:
Yes, it was an Oxford comma. Lot's of illiterate people in Punctuation Land.
Click to expand...

You are more worried about a typo than the substance of the post. I’ll start proof reading what I type the day you quit crying about Trump’s tweets and his two scoops of ice cream.
 
Joe Fan said:
According to his attorneys, extra passport recovered from Epstein’s home safe with his photo but not his name was Austrian. They say it was “for personal protection in the event of travel to dangerous areas, only to be presented to potential kidnapers, hijackers or terrorists should violent episodes occur.” They claimed “an affluent member of the Jewish faith,” Epstein intended to use it in case he was hijacked.
They did not explain why it was not issued in his name.

D_oK0juXkAInBQc.jpg
Click to expand...
Isn’t is self explanatory? About his name?
 
I35 said:
You are more worried about a typo than the substance of the post. I’ll start proof reading what I type the day you quit crying about Trump’s tweets and his two scoops of ice cream.
Click to expand...

Keep going forward even after your attempted slam boomerangs back into your face? Trump to the end, huh?

By the way, the first time your post contains any "substance" I'll respond more seriously. Still waiting for that moment of glory.

Here's an idea, maybe you and Garmel can work together to craft something, 2 heads better than 1 and all. Until then you might simply go back to liking other's posts.
 
Seattle Husker said:
Keep going forward even after your attempted slam boomerangs back into your face? Trump to the end, huh?

By the way, the first time your post contains any "substance" I'll respond more seriously. Still waiting for that moment of glory.

Here's an idea, maybe you and Garmel can work together to craft something, 2 heads better than 1 and all. Until then you might simply go back to liking other's posts.
Click to expand...

The irony. That’s rich coming from you.

Ok cool! Hook’em!
 
LongestHorn said:
Isn’t is self explanatory? About his name?
Click to expand...

He did use it, as there are at least 4 country stamps (France, Spain, the UK and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s) -- which already undermines one of the defense contentions (they wrote in part: "... And the government offers nothing to suggest -- and certainly no evidence -- that Epstein ever used it."). His attorneys being caught in a quick and dirty lie like this obviously did nothing to help his case with this judge.

Also in the response --
"The Government further notes that the defendant’s submission does not address how the defendant obtained the foreign passport and, more concerning, the defendant has still not disclosed to the Court whether he is a citizen or legal permanent resident of a country other than the United States."
​
So, there is quite a bit to still be revealed in this matter. We will see where it all goes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top