Epstein Case

I'm sure there are more than six. These dudes aren't that restrained. And I still don't understand why it's socially acceptable to praise this guy. Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and Roy Moore are monsters and perverts, but he's a swell guy. It makes no sense at all.
 
i hope someone has a hammer and nail because, as we all know by now, it isnt going to hang itself

 
Last edited:
Dude went all out



Gosar-Tweets.png
 
So this email chain got even funnier as Katie Hill (OF ALL PEOPLE!) decided to waddle in. Politics in the US has not been this entertaining since the late 60s

 
Last edited:
It's always interesting determining where the media will draw the line.
The action of sex with underaged girls did not bother them.
But then some spoken words did.
EJvJHWHWoAAzrgC.jpg
 
There will be more big name politicians (from the US and other countries), nobility (I’m guessing a number of Saudis and others), and celebrities involved with Epstein and his human trafficking victims that will be made public. This is nowhere near over.
 
Joe Fan said:
It's always interesting determining where the media will draw the line.
The action of sex with underaged girls did not bother them.
But then some spoken words did.
EJvJHWHWoAAzrgC.jpg
Click to expand...
I don't think that is it. I think the media will protect those on their side until the cat's out of the bag. When they can use an attack on one of their own to distract from a more important "client", they will throw the smuck under the bus without hesitation.
 
Statalyzer said:
I know I should accept or reject Vindman's words based on whether they are shown to be accurate or not, and not on him coming across as an egotistical douche, but since he does in fact exude such egotistical douchiness, it makes that difficult to do.
Click to expand...
Are you crossing up threads here?
 
4th_floor said:
I don't think that is it. I think the media will protect those on their side until the cat's out of the bag. When they can use an attack on one of their own to distract from a more important "client", they will throw the smuck under the bus without hesitation.
Click to expand...
Where is the "me too" movement now? I can't believe the level of hypocrisy of our media. Spend weeks and months trying to piece together some strained high school yearbook quotes into a "credible" story against Kavanaugh and totally sweep the Epstein stuff under the wrong with volumes of actual evidence that supports it.
 
Just think. Everyone would know what this means even if this wasn't on the Epstein discussion. And the idea behind it with the hangman game. Just genius.
 
4th_floor said:
I don't think that is it. I think the media will protect those on their side until the cat's out of the bag. When they can use an attack on one of their own to distract from a more important "client", they will throw the smuck under the bus without hesitation.
Click to expand...

I agree. The outrage over the n-word or any other "racially insensitive remark" is about opportunism first and foremost. Does anyone really think that these media and political types never say the n-word or other offensive things when they think they're in private? As someone who has been around some of these people when they are "comfortable," I can assure you that many of them do, and they are not outraged when they hear others say that sort of thing.
 
At first I thought he might move in with the Clintons
But then you see the risks with that and its "ah, uh, erm, no thanks mate"
 
REMINDER: A billionaire pedophile died in custody, purportedly by his own hand, and an ABC reporter was caught on camera saying she “had Clinton” with regard to that pedo.

Yet not a single American journalist has asked that reporter what she meant by it.

How do you explain that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top