I've thought about the Karen phenomenon, and I think it's dumb mainly because I don't see much of a correlation with the name. However, I can see why it sets up intersectional conflict on the Left.
A "Karen" generally negatively refers to a woman being pushy, entitled, a busybody, and frivolously calling on authorities to help her get her way. A feminist isn't going to like this, because it makes an assertive and self-centered woman look bad, but that's looking at it from only one dimension.
There are other stereotypes associated with it. Karen is white (a negative on the intersectional hierarchy), suburban (another negative), a married mother (another negative), relatively affluent (another negative), and probably doesn't have a job (a huge negative). Furthermore, she is often directing her assertiveness at ethnic minorities (who are higher on the intersectional hierarchy). So there's a lot of room for intersectional conflict.
A "Karen" generally negatively refers to a woman being pushy, entitled, a busybody, and frivolously calling on authorities to help her get her way. A feminist isn't going to like this, because it makes an assertive and self-centered woman look bad, but that's looking at it from only one dimension.
There are other stereotypes associated with it. Karen is white (a negative on the intersectional hierarchy), suburban (another negative), a married mother (another negative), relatively affluent (another negative), and probably doesn't have a job (a huge negative). Furthermore, she is often directing her assertiveness at ethnic minorities (who are higher on the intersectional hierarchy). So there's a lot of room for intersectional conflict.