Coronavirus

Day 5 and I'm much better today thankfully. 80% of energy back. Will re-test on Monday. Suspect I had Omicron since they say less severe and shorter term than Delta variant.

Recent article my wife found says a well respected Dr. claims Biden admin. is withholding Monochronial Antibodies from states to force people to get the jab. These people are evil.
 
Last edited:
Day 5 and I'm much better today. 80% of energy back. Will re-test on Monday. Suspect I had Omicron since they say less severe and shorter term than Delta variant.

Recent article my wife found says a well respected Dr. claims Biden admin. is withholding Monochronial Antibodies from states to get people to get the jab. These people are evil.
WM, as I have told others, expect a final round of fever on days 8-10. At this point, the immune system has developed T cells and the like and doing the final assault on the virus. This is also when some go downhill due to immune over-response (cykto-storm), pneumonia, etc.
 
Day 5 and I'm much better today. 80% of energy back. Will re-test on Monday. Suspect I had Omicron since they say less severe and shorter term than Delta variant.

Recent article my wife found says a well respected Dr. claims Biden admin. is withholding Monochronial Antibodies from states to get people to get the jab. These people are evil.
I see you took my brisket and ribs advice.

You're welcome.
 
Not surprisingly if you search covid case to deaths ratio it isn't easy to find. I wonder if it is less than 2000:1. I bet it is but this will go unnoticed by MSM.

Not surprising the MSM, Feds, CDC, etc. would under report, ignore, embellish, manipulate or otherwise spin data / facts to suit what THEY want to report, truth be damned.

********!
 
Not surprisingly if you search covid case to deaths ratio it isn't easy to find. I wonder if it is less than 2000:1. I bet it is but this will go unnoticed by MSM.
200m cases (estimated) and 848k deaths, or approximately 1 death per 200-250 cases (for all ages). Of course we need it for young males.
 
200m cases (estimated) and 848k deaths, or approximately 1 death per 200-250 cases (for all ages). Of course we need it for young males.
One dataset shows 15-24 year olds are 25% of the cases. Males would be half that. Of course deaths would be a fraction of total.
 
200D8788-FB6E-45A0-8B55-3D7A97644920.jpeg
 
One dataset shows 15-24 year olds are 25% of the cases. Males would be half that. Of course deaths would be a fraction of total.
Assume at most, young adults are 1% of total deaths. Then it would 25m cases for young males and 4240 deaths. The ratio of cases to deaths then would be 1/6000. By the way 1% of deaths is really for 25-35 age bracket. It is probably 1/10 of 1%, which equates to 1/60,000.
 
Last edited:
It speaks volumes that fully vaccinated 80+ have a higher death rate than UNvaccinated 30-49 year olds. It goes to show that we really messed up the analysis, messaging and protocols on this from the word go. If leaders had taken the time to analyze the co-morbidity data we could have really done so much better of a job on this.
 
Assume at most, young adults are 1% of total deaths. Then it would 25m cases for young males and 4240 deaths. The ratio of cases to deaths then would be 1/6000. By the way 1% of deaths is really for 25-35 age bracket. It is probably 1/10 of 1%, which equates to 1/60,000.
Article above says only 600 children die of Covid (less than 18). For 18-24, I would triple that to 1800. For males, take 50% of the total, or 1200 deaths. Thus one death out of approx 20,000 cases. If not obese, the ratio of deaths to cases from Covid is 1/50,000.
 
Good thread here. One of the posts:



Wow. Something that was useful and not rank partisan hackery was published in the New York Times. That's a rarity.

What's pathetic is that Leonhardt is posing questions that the media and the Left generally have been saying is immoral to ask since Day 1. If you didn't support every effort to allegedly stop the spread virus in the immediate term without any consideration or balancing of other factors (economic, social, or even medical), you were part of a "death cult" and morally depraved.
 
Interesting but I don’t get the part about unvaxxed increases the risk for anyone but themselves. It shouldn’t have any effect on the risk for the vaxxed. They are (supposedly) protected for crying out loud.
 
If you didn't support every effort to allegedly stop the spread virus in the immediate term without any consideration or balancing of other factors (economic, social, or even medical), you were part of a "death cult" and morally depraved.
This is what my liberal friend in Austin is now saying (note the come-down):
People can’t blame the virus, because the virus doesn’t care. So they blame teachers and politicians. I think a little humility is needed. We are at war with nature, and we need to be careful.
 
Interesting but I don’t get the part about unvaxxed increases the risk for anyone but themselves. It shouldn’t have any effect on the risk for the vaxxed. They are (supposedly) protected for crying out loud.
By overcrowding hospitals is my understanding
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top