Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe a little. It would be an additional diagnosis like HTN or something. I think any gravy would be taken up by additional ppe and staff.I know you know much more about revenue cycle for hospitals than me, so I ask your perspective. Are the hospitals also getting reimbursed more for patients with Covid regardless of severity of symptoms? IE a car wreck patient who also tests positive for Covid.
suck it nannies, part deaux:
Very well laid out. I think if they would have come out early with a clear and unequivocal statement of advice, we would be in much better shape.Two things seem apparent to me. First, the more onerous the restrictions on an individual level, the more people will violate them. Tell us to wear a mask in the grocery store and not to stand too close to each other, and most of us will do it (even those who doubt its effectiveness) because it isn't that big of a deal. Tell us to spend the holidays alone and never to see our friends, and most of us will blow it off. Even the people saying to do it often blow it off even though it kills their credibility.
Second, I suspect that Covid spreads more easily in homes than in public places. The quarters are tighter, and there's no one to enforce or encourage social distancing, washing hands, etc.
In other words, people in California are almost surely getting together. However, instead of meeting in restaurants and public places where they can be encouraged by staff to spread out, hand sanitize, wear masks, etc., they're meeting in homes where that stuff is largely ignored. Let's be honest. Other than Switzer, at home most of us wash our hands after going to the bathroom, before we cook food, before we eat, and when they are clearly dirty. (In his defense, the water in Oklahoma would probably make his hands dirtier rather than cleaner, even if he just got finished picking his nose and wiping his *** if they do that in Oklahoma.) We're not sanitizing them every few minutes like we do in public places. We don't stay six feet apart. We sure as hell don't wear masks.
The bottom line is that we're probably at the point where locking down is starting to become counterproductive. On the individual level, compliance is probably getting low and creating more situations in which the virus is likely to spread than if we kept things open with reasonable restrictions.
Did I read that a University [Harvard?) was going to mandate the vax except blacks could opt out duento racism?
Current estimates are 30% of nation is infected. Likely approaching 40-50% in urban centers.Dumb liberals think a president can stop the virus from killing people. The strategy is to flatten the curve, not eliminate it. 60% will be infected regardless of government action a year from now. 25% of NYC is likely infected by now. Government can only slow it down, not eliminate it.
BumpWhat does it matter anyway? You can’t stop a virus, only slow it down.
BumpHere is an article from Andrew Sullivan, a never trumper, who is smart enough to realize that you can’t stop a virus, only slow it down:
And this is the truth about reality. It really does exist (whatever the postmodernists might argue). It’s complicated. And even if it can be ignored or forgotten in our very human discourses, it wins in the end. This virus is, in a way, a symbol of that reality. It can be stymied for a while; it can be suppressed and avoided. It can be controlled so it doesn’t overwhelm us in one fell swoop, metastasizing the damage. But it is unbeatable and is winning this war, as it was always going to, and only a vaccine can make a real difference. The coming months will be an unsatisfying series of starts and stops as we struggle to live with it. We are not, in other words, fighting and winning this war — we are merely negotiating the terms of our surrender to reality. And there is nothing more humbling for humans than that. And nothing more clarifying either.
BumpAll of this is irrelevant. You can’t stop a virus. You libs are dumb.
BumpCan’t stop a virus.
BumpCan’t stop a virus this contagious. Unfortunate but true.
BumpCan’t stop a virus. Cases and deaths are going to have a long tail.
BumpCan’t stop a virus. I told you that one month ago. Thanks for supporting my assertion with data.
Can't stop a virus? Are you sure about that?Someone wise on this board said back in April that you can’t stop a virus.
"People Are Fed Up": California Out Of Excuses As Coronavirus Defies Militant Lockdowns | ZeroHedge
Does polio still exist as a virus? Has it been stopped?Can't stop a virus? Are you sure about that?![]()
Still in parts of India. I took a polio booster 2 years ago. It depends on vaccine type. Some types prevent illness and other types prevent spread. It’s sort of complicated.Does polio still exist as a virus? Has it been stopped?
All I know is that McHammer is wrong.Does polio still exist as a virus? Has it been stopped?
Regardless, I quoted Sullivan in an April tweet (bumped above) that says only a vaccine provides some protection.Does polio still exist as a virus? Has it been stopped?
Maybe my sarcasm director is on the fritz this morning.
All I know is that McHammer is wrong.