In reply to:
--------------------------------------------------------------
If your answer was that refusing a breath test shows that you might have been over a 0.080 g/210l, fine, you have just violated the oath required of every juror and the court's charge as nothing therein asks whether you think the defendant was over 0.080.
-----------------------------------------------------------
hmmm, not so much. either element is sufficient for a DWI conviction, intoxicated to the point where one's physical/mental faculties are lost OR BAC of 0.08 or higher.
_________________________________________
Yes, so much. Ok, Sooner, I will type this slowly so that you will understand.
Where there is no breath test, you cannot be found guilty of having over a 0.080 because there is no evidence of it. In fact, that option will not even be in the jury charge or the complaint and information.
In a BTR (breath test refusal) case, the jury charge only authorizes a conviction if the jury is convinced beyond a reasonalble doubt that the defendant lost his/her mental or physical faculties due to alcohol, etc.