You forgot.....and handsome.No one is more humble than you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You forgot.....and handsome.No one is more humble than you.
I didn't forget, I thought I would let His Humbleness tell us.You forgot.....and handsome.
I would disagree that the Church's teaching on purgatory is not theological.Purgatory is a theological supposition and not official church teaching.
I meant to say it is not official church doctrine (vs teaching), meaning no one is obligated to believe it to be catholic.I would disagree that the Church's teaching on purgatory is not theological.
It's based on scripture, so it's not a supposition. Now, the Church doesn't teach definitively if it is a place or a process, but it is real. I'm on the side of process.
I know this isn't Catholic Bible study, but If no one minds I'll toss in a couple or so scriptural principles regarding purgatory. Of course you're free to disagree, not trying to convert anyone....
2 Samuel 12:13-18
“David said to Nathan, ‘I have sinned against the Lord.’ And Nathan said to David, ‘the Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die. Nevertheless, because by this deed you have utterly scorned the Lord, the child that is born to you shall die.’ And the Lord struck the child that Uriah’s wife bore to David, and it became sick… On the seventh day the child died.”
Biblical Principle #1 – there is punishment for sin even after one has received forgiveness.
Revelation 21:27
“But nothing unclean shall enter it…” Referring to the New Jerusalem – Heaven.
Biblical Principle #2 – nothing unclean, nothing with the stain of sin, will enter Heaven.
Heb 12:22-23
“But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living god, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering, and to the assembly of the first-born who are enrolled in heaven, and to a judge who is God of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect…”
Biblical Principle #3 – there is a way, a process, through which the spirits of the just are “made perfect”.
1 Cor 3:13-15
“…each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day (judgment day) will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work which any man has built on the foundation (Jesus Christ) survives, he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.”
Where is this place that a man, after he dies, suffers loss, as through fire, but is still saved? Hell? No, once you’re in Hell you don’t get out. Heaven? No, you don’t suffer loss in Heaven.
Biblical Principle #4 – there is a place in the afterlife other than Heaven or Hell.
I know that was a general statement and not directed at any specific person or group, but I get a kick out of it when it's made against the Catholic Church. Cause you know, the Pope livin it up in his 1 bedroom apartment and his Ferrari lolI think those re-writing the OT wanted a nice fear driven motivator to assure that people gave money to the church to keep the coffers full.
Okay, gotcha. SorryI meant to say it is not official church doctrine (vs teaching), meaning no one is obligated to believe it to be catholic.
His name is Bacon? Maybe it’s turkey bacon.
I would disagree that the Church's teaching on purgatory is not theological.
It's based on scripture, so it's not a supposition. Now, the Church doesn't teach definitively if it is a place or a process, but it is real. I'm on the side of process.
I know this isn't Catholic Bible study, but If no one minds I'll toss in a couple or so scriptural principles regarding purgatory. Of course you're free to disagree, not trying to convert anyone....
2 Samuel 12:13-18
“David said to Nathan, ‘I have sinned against the Lord.’ And Nathan said to David, ‘the Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die. Nevertheless, because by this deed you have utterly scorned the Lord, the child that is born to you shall die.’ And the Lord struck the child that Uriah’s wife bore to David, and it became sick… On the seventh day the child died.”
Biblical Principle #1 – there is punishment for sin even after one has received forgiveness.
Revelation 21:27
“But nothing unclean shall enter it…” Referring to the New Jerusalem – Heaven.
Biblical Principle #2 – nothing unclean, nothing with the stain of sin, will enter Heaven.
Heb 12:22-23
“But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living god, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering, and to the assembly of the first-born who are enrolled in heaven, and to a judge who is God of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect…”
Biblical Principle #3 – there is a way, a process, through which the spirits of the just are “made perfect”.
1 Cor 3:13-15
“…each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day (judgment day) will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work which any man has built on the foundation (Jesus Christ) survives, he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.”
Where is this place (or process) that a man, after he dies, suffers loss, as through fire, but is still saved? Hell? No, once you’re in Hell you don’t get out. Heaven? No, you don’t suffer loss in Heaven.
Biblical Principle #4 – there is a place in the afterlife other than Heaven or Hell.
That’s actually a great point, By. This verse was more to lay out the biblical principle of punishment even after forgiveness, not necessarily the process of purgatory.Looks like David's purgatory was served here on Earth. The thing is, he knew his sin and the punishment. Most of us don't know if bad news is the same as what David experienced.
The most useless food product in existence.
Yes. In my mind's eye I saw the Church of England when I formed that sentence.I don't think @OUBubba is talking about when the OT was written, but rather when it was rewritten in the form of the King James version that distorted the translation in numerous ways.
That looks intriguing. I took much solace from Mark, "I believe. Help my unbelief."I read a book called The Christian Agnostic. In it, the author preached that an all or nothing literal belief can separate us from God. He approached problematic passages with two boxes of storage so that he could continue on in his scholarship and faith:
1) "It may be so, I do not know"
2) "Awaiting further light"
That looks intriguing. I took much solace from Mark, "I believe. Help my unbelief."
I am jealous of those who look in the mirror with absolute faith.
Yeah, I think @huisache has this right. This is not about garnering Jewish support. It is about supporting far-right Christian values.
I'm a Christian of the Right. I'm generally pro-Israel. I personally like Jews. In fact, I've never met a Jew I didn't like. (Same with Mormons.) However, there is a segment of the Christian Right that sorta has a weird fetish for Jews and Judaism. It's not a sexual fetish, but it's a strange political fetish with a religious undertone. It's the John Hagee phenomenon. They incorporate a Jewish angle on things whenever they can. Even with my generally positive views of Israel and Jews, I think it's weird.
Many Okies are HUGE fans of the chosen people. But, not, you know, actual Jews in the US because I have no idea. Some of them even minimize the impact of the holocaust. They can't generally separate followers of Judaism from the state of Israel.I'm a Christian of the Right. I'm generally pro-Israel. I personally like Jews. In fact, I've never met a Jew I didn't like. (Same with Mormons.) However, there is a segment of the Christian Right that sorta has a weird fetish for Jews and Judaism. It's not a sexual fetish, but it's a strange political fetish with a religious undertone. It's the John Hagee phenomenon. They incorporate a Jewish angle on things whenever they can. Even with my generally positive views of Israel and Jews, I think it's weird.
Agree, the Church has a vast amount of beautiful breathtaking art. Thank God!
I have no problem with the Catholic church having a lot of art, but I'm not sure how having it promotes anything biblical. It's not like money, which can be used to build churches and help the poor. It's just sitting there looking fancy.
Agree… that’s why He founded his own.I seem to recall a poor carpenter without any possessions being a tad unimpressed by the leaders of the church in his day...
Interesting, Deez.I have no problem with the Catholic church having a lot of art, but I'm not sure how having it promotes anything biblical. It's not like money, which can be used to build churches and help the poor. It's just sitting there looking fancy.
Matthew 26:6-11
A woman came up to Him with an alabaster jar of very expensive ointment, and she poured it on His head as He sat at table. But when the disciples saw it, they were indignant, saying, “Why this waste? For the ointment might have been sold for a large sum and given to the poor.” But Jesus, aware of this, said to them, “Why do you trouble the woman? For she has done a beautiful thing to Me. For you always have the poor with you, but you will not always have Me.”
Yes. In my mind's eye I saw the Church of England when I formed that sentence.
Interesting reading/writing here. I've always believed that the hell that scares us all is Dante's version. As a kid with some Baptist upbringing I cringed every time my old man would say "I'd give my front seat in hell for __________". After reading, classes, thought, etc. I re-formed my theories.
I'm a Christian of the Right. I'm generally pro-Israel. I personally like Jews. In fact, I've never met a Jew I didn't like. (Same with Mormons.) However, there is a segment of the Christian Right that sorta has a weird fetish for Jews and Judaism. It's not a sexual fetish, but it's a strange political fetish with a religious undertone. It's the John Hagee phenomenon. They incorporate a Jewish angle on things whenever they can. Even with my generally positive views of Israel and Jews, I think it's weird.
I've never heard that in 20 years of attending a Protestant church. Considering the Jews have always been in the Israel area, and have had their own country for 70 plus years, you'd have to be pretty old to remember a time that they didn't have their own country.
Maybe mentioned already. There's a common view in Protestant churches that Jews must return to Israel as a precondition for Christ’s second coming.